Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Creation at last ****WON****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

No, I can't find one for this financial year but they started charging me 2.2 towards the end of last last year (so much for being on a debt management plan) so that will do as far as I am concerned. They did 'phone me up within the last 2 weeks and said they were charging me 30% but would be reducing it to 15% so that was the reason I asked and I do make some profit into the bargain if it comes off. Mustn't count chickens and all that...............

 

I tried calling them but can't get an answer on one tel number and told 'the other person has cleared' on expensive 0870 number.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean by contractual interest? I just want to be clear that your understanding is the same as mine. Are you talking about the interest that has been charged on your penalty charges. Do you have a spreadsheet in mind that you plan to use?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I should have said compound interest. Yes I do mean interest on my charges. A statement has just arrived stating 30.9% is their usual rate. I would imagine they have charged me that for most of the life of this account but as I said earlier they appear to have been charging me 2.2% recently when charges were introduced, 30.9% for one month and 15% since then. Hence my reasoning that asking for 26.6% is not unreasonable. I am using the spreadsheet that ukaviator recommended. I just enter the interest rate, date and amount of charge and it works out the interest whilst showing how many days have elapsed since charge. I have amended prelim letter stating I am claiming compound interest. Perhaps I should claim 30.9% and put 26.6% in the alternative (along with 8%) when - if - I end up filing at court.

 

I've only had one cup of tea so not firing on all cylinders. Am I being greedy considering 30.9%. Definately, maybe...............

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, no it's not (I think). I multiplied it in my head adding up to 26.6% when it should have been 26.4%. Have I not calculated correctly with you saying 30%? Oh well, letter gone off now. See what happens.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sallyass

 

If you are claiming Compound Interest then you should use the current rate it says on your statement. Sometimes there are 2 rates, one for cash advances, and the other for spending with your card. If you do have 2 rates, then you can average the two and add that to every charge on your spreadsheet.

 

If you do claim compounded interest, you can't claim 8% as well, it's one or the other. If you ask for both you could have your claim thrown out for unjust enrichment.

 

If your actual APR is 30% a year, then that amount is what you ask for in Compounded Interest. After all it is the amount that they have charged you.

 

I would also file your claim with the N1 form, and don't use MCOL, as they will automatically stay your claim.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, no it's not (I think). I multiplied it in my head adding up to 26.6% when it should have been 26.4%. Have I not calculated correctly with you saying 30%? Oh well, letter gone off now. See what happens.
It's 30% because it's compounded. 2.2%x12=26.4 as you say, but that isn't how you work out compound interest. The formula is

 

(1 + 0.022)^12 - 1 = 0.298 = 29.8% (as near as makes no difference to 30%)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So that's how it works, thanks Steve. Oh well, if they don't give me a refund in 2 weeks I will ask for 30% next time.

 

UK, thanks for looking. I meant giving the judge 3 alternatives, 26.4% or 30% or 8%. Creation has just one rate of 30.9% for everything on my card. I was just trying to not be too greedy as they stopped charging me interest for a while and are apparently only charging me 15% now. Why should I do them any favours though as you rightly pointed out they charged me the going rate.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i also have a problem with creation had this account for a good 8 years. i am a single parent been in collage and uni for most of them. i just have noticed that they have been charging me payment protection only noticed it recently because its almost as much as my interest which is silly and when i told them i was struggling they told me about the protection when i got a copy and called them they told me they needed evidence i was on job seekers but can not claim as at uni. i am going to ask for my protection back although they said on the back of the statement no payments will be refunded. found your post intresting can i claim back any of these silly interest rates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any excuse will do won't it!!!!! Can't claim 'cos you're not on jsa - pull the other one. You have been missold a PPI. Go looking for PPIs which I think you will find in the general section or there may be an entire section on it. CAG member 'Nightmare4banks' is very knowledgeable on this subject so why not look for threads started by him. Have you started your own thread? Don't let them bully you - just get even.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/131585-legal-question-ppi-credit.html

 

Have found this by him which you might find useful. :p

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

True Steven, but I don't want the judge to think I am being greedy only going for compound. I am planning on just going for 30% in my next letter so the 8% will only appear on my N1 as an alternative. Were they charging one rate for cash withdrawals and a lower rate for amount outstanding I would have put 3 rates for the courts consideration but as they only have one rate for everything that is what I shall be claiming.

 

I have noticed (different subject) that you have your natwest claims resting as it were. Are you waiting for the test case to be resolved before submitting another claim to avoid it being thrown out as an abuse of court time, because this is what it says on one of my claims as I now have 2 cases in pipeline for same bank. Or am I getting my knickers in a twist for nothing? What I am hoping is that both cases will be looked at together in the fullness of time which must cut back on time allocated by the courts but we can assume that the banks will settle before any future court date as they did in the past.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 NW claims on hold - the first is for my business account which is only a couple of charges whih I was going to use to test out some stuff on componund interest which has now been overtaken by events. i will probably drop this claim. The other is my son's credit card claim which is on hoold just because I have got too many other things going on. The same is true of the Next claim.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have also had major problems with creation, one of the problems was they put protection on and i never realised it. I only noticed it when it was almost as much as the protection they charged me. have since cancelled it in writing but they still found a way to get another payment did not get there in time they said. i argued this as i know it was there the day before next bill was printed but to no avail. however have since written to them to ask for SAR think they should send me the contract i signed. I spoke to the Ombusman about this and they said this company was not regulated untill 2005 and athough ive been paying insurance since at least 2003 could only try and claim from date of regulation. whilst on this subject does anyone know if i could argue the intrest rates they are charging its now 39.5% and i know thats not what i agree to and if I cant argue this does this mean they can basically charge what they want and as long as you owe them money you have to pay what they say surly something can be done carnt it. sorry I have used your thred but didnt know how to do a new one. but hope some of the info is relivent to you. plus will be intresting on the outcome. I also found out all the money i did pay in protection would never have even covered me because i was a student and not in work. will keep you updated on what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi babygirl

 

If they have added charges to your account (eg for late payemnt) you should claim those back and possibly claim back all the protection (PPI) payemnts as well if you can show that the insurance is no use to you - ie it was mis-sold. The fact that they weren't regulated until 2005 is not relevant as far as this is concerned.

 

Unfortunately, they can increase the interest rate at will provided they give you warning in writing. If this is a store card, see if you can move the balance to another credit card with zero rate for transfers.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello people - did you miss me? I've been a bit busy sorting out group appeal against single status but I'm back now.

 

Had a letter from creation yesterday stating they do not agree with the OFT statement of 5 April 2006 but purely as a gesture of goodwill they have credited my account with the sum of £63 being the difference between what I am claiming and the £12 they say they are entitled to charge me. With my compounded interest rate now at 30% (thanks Steve) I am now claiming over £750. Dare I risk their wrath by telling them to take back their credit and cough up what they owe me? Letter going in post tomorrow.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can try telling them to take it back. Alternatively, acknowledge that you have received it but tell tem that you acceptit as a part settlement only and intend to carry on the claim for the rest, to court if necessary. Then go on to the next stage.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep going papadak - we will follow your progress on your thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/store-cards/126200-selfridges-charges-re-claimable.html

 

(I'll get a mod to change the title now you know the answer to the question ;))

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...