Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Needed With LLoyds Court Case


mrman2007
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

really hope you can help and also that i am posting my thread in the right forum.

 

I had a LLoyds black horse car loan about 3.5 years ago. the original agreement was for about £30,000 i have paid off about £18,000 so have a balance of about 12k remaining. after the 3 years i was due to hand the car back or pay the balloon. to cut a long story short i have done neither. this morning i had a letter from the courts saying I am in court on monday 28th jan! the letter has been at my house for a few weeks but i have been away on holiday until today so obviously had no idea i was due to be in court. the fees have mounted up and even if i hand the car back i will still owe them in excess of 5k.

 

Can anyone tell me if i am within my rights to ask the judge for some more time while i prepare my case and perhaps do a SAR request or data protection request to get a copy of agreement and breakdown of charges etc to make sure they are correct and that it is all enforceable. if so how long should i ask for? am i right in saying it can take them 60 days to respond to a SAR?

 

help would me much apreciated as my court hearing is not far away.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry found a bit more......

 

Following default under a hire purchase agreement the claimant is entitled to the return of the goods, payment of the arrears, and half the total price and further sums due thereunder....

 

i asked for time to prepare my defense but the court receptionist told me to come to court on monday and ask the judge for time????

 

not sure what other info you need if any? can you make sense of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again.

 

My thinking was actually whether this was an 'Allocation Hearing' - these are usually, (but not always) held before the main hearing to decide issues like which 'track' the case is allocated to, whether the defendant / claimant needs to produce documents, and by which date, etc. Basically the District Judge will use this hearing to clarify these matters with the both parties and issue directions on how the case is to proceed.

 

Alternatively, the claimant may have asked for a summary judgement at a hearing, where they will ask the judge to make a decision against you.

 

If the court form does not indicate either of these hearings, I would get on the phone asap to the court to clarify at which stage this case is and what type of hearing it is.

 

Once we know that, I am sure you will get the advice you need - if not, I will send a message to someone with experience in these matters to help you out.

 

Hope that makes sense!

 

BAE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou you have been most helpful. I am pretty sure they are taking me to court to take the car off me. i dont want this to happen as they will send it to public auction where it will sell for a lot less than it is worth. i will then be responisble for paying the balance between what it gets at auction and what i owe them. from your experience will they give me more time to compile my case based on the fact i only saw the summons today and the hearing is on monday?

 

i'd like to do a S.A.R to make sure it is all above board and also to get a copy of the original agreement. surely i am entitled to these before the case can be heard and decided on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, MrMan

 

Now that the dispute is at the court stage, there is no need to do a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). They have to send you any information you require under CPR (Civil Procedure Rules).

 

Below is a template letter you need to send to LLoyds asap, by recorded delivery - not forgetting to edit it for your own purposes.

 

 

In the XXXX County Court

Claimant -v- (YOUR NAME)

Claim Number: (CLAIM NUMBER)

 

 

Dear XXX

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

I have received a recent court claim from your organisation. In order to file a defence and counter claim I require some information. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below.

 

The information must be furnished within fourteen days of the receipt of this letter. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

b. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with XXXXXXXXXX

c. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

d.Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

e. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

f. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

g. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

h. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

i. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

 

 

I will require this information within the next fourteen days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

XXXX (type, don't sign).

 

You will also need to Write a Witness Statement detailing your situation and why you have not replied to the claim, (holidays etc), and any other relevant details as to why you need more time. Only you can do this as only you know the situation exactly. For example, the DJ will want to know that you have legitimate grounds for defending the case, and why you have let it get to this stage. Plus if you get it all down in a statement you will feel less pressure in court as you can refer to it. If you get to the court early on Monday you can get an affadavit, which is basically a sworn statement that what you've written is true, signed by the court staff for free. I would if it was me.

 

By the way, the template letter is letter 3 in this excellent thread by Tomterm.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/108467-basic-introduction-consumer-credit.html

I would give it a good read because it will at the very least reassure you that the 'courtroom' is not as scary as it sounds!

 

 

And most of all, read this!! http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide-new-post.html

 

BAE:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your help, i will follow your advice and make my statement for the judge, i would say that my ability to pay is the reson it has got this far, is it a good enough reason for him to give me more time to prepare? also i think the relationship with black horse broke down after i missed a few payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...