Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paycheque overpaid?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Let's say my employer has a payment system like this:

 

Week 1: I do the work worth £15. (I also get paid £10 for last week's work)

Week 2: I get the £10 paycheque with £15 written on the front. I also get the £15 in my bank account. I also do work worth £20.

Week 3: I get the £15 paycheque and get paid £20, with £20 written on the front of the paycheque.

 

Basically, if on week 2 they write £24 on the front of my paycheque, but I get paid £33...

 

a) What could have happened?

b) Is it legally my money?

c) Can they reclaim it back via BACS or will they make a deduction from my next paycheque?

 

I don't intend on saying anything to them until I get the actual proper paycheque that will either say £24 or £33. I might have got a bonus or something! (yeah right)

 

Thanks in advance for any help,

 

Dan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful, my son had this happen and he was the one who rang to say I think you are overpaying me. He had just left the company and as his wage slips did not state what was back pay, holiday pay, severence pay or delayed overtime pay it was all very confusing.

 

Than you for letting us know, they said, we will look into it. He heard nothing for 2 years and 10 months---then they took him to court and he has to pay it back!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful, my son had this happen and he was the one who rang to say I think you are overpaying me. He had just left the company and as his wage slips did not state what was back pay, holiday pay, severence pay or delayed overtime pay it was all very confusing.

 

Than you for letting us know, they said, we will look into it. He heard nothing for 2 years and 10 months---then they took him to court and he has to pay it back!!!!

:-| If it is the case that my paycheque says the lower amount, I'll probably phone my boss up straight away then. Don't want my employers suing me!
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are overpaid, legally the money is not yours....unless 6 years has passed and they have made no attempt to contact you or take steps to claim it back, then the debt is defined as statute barred, meaning they cannot use any legal means to get it back, so effectively sweet fa can be done about it. However, there were cases in the US and some in the UK in which the courts awarded judgements to the employers as the employee has an obligation to repay the money. Same applies when banks deposit too much into your account.

  • Haha 1

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Itemised pay statements

All employees must have an itemised pay statement containing a minimum of the gross pay, net pay, amounts and reasons of deductions and the methods by which every part of the net pay will be paid. The statement, or pay slip, must be given to the employee either prior to or on the pay day.

Deductions from Wages

An employer is allowed to make certain deductions from an employees wages, which include Tax & NI, attachments of earnings, authorised third person payments without prior written authorisation from the employee.

Even if the employee owes their employer money, repayment of a loan for example, and fails to pay it the employer, without specific written consent from the employee, can not just deduct it from their wages.

There are certain payments that are not classed as wages, which include advances, redundancy payments and compensation.

A retail shop worker may have a maximum of 10% of their gross wages deducted to pay back cash and stock shortages following written notification.

If a complaint to a tribunal is upheld then the deduction is made illegal and, no matter how justified the deduction was, must be paid back, furthermore, no other court action to recover the deduction may be made.

Overpayment of Wages

An employer is allowed to recover overpayments of wages, if the amount was quite large the employer would generally be expected to inform and then negotiate a repayment schedule with the employee. An employee need not pay back the overpayment if they can prove to a court that they did not know nor could they have reasonably been expected to have known of the overpayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's 14.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

. An employee need not pay back the overpayment if they can prove to a court that they did not know nor could they have reasonably been expected to have known of the overpayment.

 

This defence is really in the minority, as it could be said that if they have been paid the same amount regularly previously, it would have been notice that more money had been paid than normal, therefore highlighting the issue (eliminating the defence of not knowing). The defence of not reasonably being expected to have known of the overpayment is a legal mystery, and I have no idea how you could build a defence on this at all!

 

On another note, I was overpaid once on a final pay packet, but did not know it at the time. Between the time of my final pay and my ex employer discovering it, I had been through the bankruptcy and the debt was listed as part of my 'estate' as well as my personal debts, therefore statute barred!

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that if you knew the amount was too much , when compared against the usual sum paid for x number of hours at £ per hour then you would not be able to prove that you didnt know, but if you were not receiving a weekly pay slip with an itemised breakdown of the wage , detailing tax / national insurance etc then you could not have reasonably have known that what you were receiving constituted over payment, as wage slips are usually a good source of reference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to highlight and reiterate a part of Prushtons post

 

"All employees must have an itemised pay statement"

 

Why are you not getting proper payslips BT?

I never said I was!

 

I do, just I get them a week later than the money gets paid into my account. It turned out I got 'Hol Pay' of the extra amount in the paycheque I recieved the next week, probably referring to either the week's holiday I had in the summer (perhaps their year ends halfway through January :grin:) or I had only one part of my job to do on new year's week, instead of 3 as usual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...