Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You probably do need to ignore it, but show it to us just in case. Cover up your name, address and anything that could ID you like your car reg. HB
    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

advice with county court & capquest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a loan maybe 9/10 years ago. Then came out of work and was unable to pay. Heard absolutely nothing for years, then suddenly capquest was on the job. The first thing we heard from them was a Judgment for Claimant telling me it had gone to court at Northampton and I had to pay the amount in full. So I looked on the internet and found a form "Application for suspension of a warrant and/or variation of an order" (N245). I filled this in sent a letter saying I had found this form and would it do and encloed a £10 postal order. (still not working as I have young children) Now today we have received a Notice of Transfer of Proceedings letter saying the claim has been transferred to the Redditch County Court for enforcement. What does this mean please? The amount they are claiming we do not recognise either. I thought they would have send a paying in book or something not this, they haven't even acknowledged my £10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG,Dolphin.

 

It sounds like they got judgment by default by filing the papers electronically at the 'bulk' centre. For ease, these cases are listed as being at Northampton County Court. In responding the court have transferred the case to the county court nearest where you live.

 

As this debt seems to be over six years old, it may not have been enforceable. If you can, post some details of the case after taking out any personal identifying details to see if you can be helped further.

 

Whatever you do, don't acknowledge that you owe the debt in writing.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dolphin

Did you receive any letters through the post regarding this case.

Who is the debt with?

How long since you last made a payment or acknowledged it in writing?

Tip us a wink on my scales if you think I may have helped at all;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent this N245 on11/11/07 paying the £10 but before that must be 7/8 years ago since last paying anything. The original debt was from Alliance and Leicester took out before my eldest born hes now 7 1/2 years old. The only letters we received in the post was this judgment for claimant and now the notice of transfer. I have never acknowledged this debt apart from filling in the application for suspension of a warrant and/or variation of an order. It says I cannot pay the amount ordered and

I wish to apply for: suspension of the warrant

and/or

a reduction in the instalment order.

 

I ticked a suspension of the warrant.

 

Looking at the Judgment for Claimant in brackets underneath it says (in default). Does this help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

You will need to apply to the local county court to have the judgment 'set aside'. The application should be on the general application form (N244) which you can download from the court service website. You may have the address but in case you haven't it is www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk.

The grounds for your application should be (a) because you never received any letter, claim details or other correspondence from the claimant or their solicitors AND (b) because you believe any alleged debt is over eight years old. Explain how you found out about this debt in Part C of the form but do not acknowledge you owe any money.

Take the form to the court if you can with the notice of transfer from Northampton and talk to one of the court staff about putting in your set aside application. There is normally a fee to pay of £75 but this is waived if you are on means tested benefits. Read the Court web site before you go about being unable to pay the court fee if this applies to you.

At the same time you should write to the solicitors asking for details of their clients claim. Make sure you state at the top of your letter that you do not acknowledge that you owe any money. There are templates around on other threads for the kind of letter. I'll try to find one for you unless someone else posts a link.

Cheers

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks at first glance that the judgement has been granted by default.

My point is, can this judgement be quashed as it looks as though it would have been statute barred at the time of the hearing.

Just a thought.

Tip us a wink on my scales if you think I may have helped at all;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dolphin you MUST, MUST fight this, this is disgusting Capquest trying it on to make a totally unenforceable debt 'enforceable' (they are trying to frighten you and get judgement !!! is it at all possible you can cross off all the personal details, scan it and then post it on here....if you are sure you have neither acknowledged or paid anything towards the debt in the last 6 years it is DEFINATELY statute barred and NOT enforceable by law.....I would also inform the FOS, Trading Standards (their local TS), OFT and get your MP involved....

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think this is it. Just been looking through way back stuff and found on a bank statement loan amount went in on 13 May 1999. Would only have paid it for a year or 2 at most because our son was born then and that when I was out of work.

DSC00005.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this not contempt of court territory? The DCA are obviously misusing court time and assets.

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dolphin, this was more of an open question than something you should be doing.

 

Contempt Of Court (Tiscali):

 

Behaviour that shows lack of respect for the authority of a court of law, such as disobeying a court order, breach of an injunction, or improper use of legal documents. Behaviour that disrupts, prejudices, or interferes with court proceedings either inside or outside the courtroom may also be contempt. The court may punish contempt with a fine or imprisonment.

 

This seems to cover what you are being put through. I am no expert here but was hoping someone with more legal knowledge than me could comment?

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court would not look at statute barring as an option unless it is brought to their attention and obviously a DCA who seeks to earn is not going to draw their attention to it. it's a bit like the CCA that the DCA is supposed to present before every court case, but how many never have a valid one?

 

I would submit a set aside application asap and a complaint to the FOS and TS et al.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very much time related. it depends on how long it is since the judgement was received and how long it is since the court case was actioned. the gist obtained from the thread is that it has only just happened. this is a good thing

 

Tomorrow is a monday and as such the ideal day to get it all started. I would advise to leave the complaining til later, telephone the courts and seek advice on a set aside, it is never a bad thing to get in touch with the courts, they do this on a daily basis and whilst they cannot give legal advice, they can give procedural advice.

 

Either contact them directly/telephone (preferable) or online and initiate a motion to set aside the CCJ at the soonest opportunity. get the forms senty in asap, make notes and take names, ensure your eye for detail is in gear and get the wheels in motion, the court staff will normall be quite helpful and even if they're not helpful, they will be increasingly curious over this one....

 

Once the courts are actioning your instructions then is the time to start complaining, get the scuzzballs off your back and then seek retribution. ideally financial but who knows.

 

The chance to nail one of them, acting not in a way that could be construed as illegal, but in a way that is illegal, persuing through the courts a debt that is prescribed by law as statute barred. a case that is brought by their legal representative as well as a court that fails to recognise the obvious and a legal representative that fails to bring to the courts attention the obvious legal state.

 

The possibilities whilst not being endless are well worth a shimmy to see what falls out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok just to clarify here are the dates

default judgement obtained on 8/11/2007

wife sent this N245 on 11/11/07 (heard nothing)

recieved letter "notice of transfer of procedings dated 10/1/082 on 12/1/08

i hope that this isnt too much time that has lapsed

which court do i phone my local one or the one named on the last letter i recieved

any chance of a link to get to the "set motion aside" webpage ive had a look but it is a mine field

finally what do i say am i admitting that i owe this money or doesnt it matter either was as the debt is over 6 years old sorry for all the questions but having a hard time taking it all in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dolphin,

As Spamhead suggests you need to start with contacting the Court office. The dates are fine if you call your local court in the next few days. Quote the number of the case as a reference to them.

You will need to complete form N244 and pay the fee of £70 but the court staff will help you with the procedure. You may have to go before the judge in your local court but don't worry about that now.

Once you have made the application, post an update. Whatever you do, do NOT acknowledge the debt in writing because the six year 'clock' starts running again if you acknowledge the debt. As to the payment of £10, I think the easiest way to explain that is that you received a court order to pay and sent what you could afford but without acknowledging that you owed anything.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that is there anybody out there that could help me with the wording that i use to fill in the n244 form

ie the correct wording to use without admitting this debt

 

also which court office do i call and what questions do i ask

 

if somebody could help me on this i would forever be in there debt

 

many thanks

 

also more questions when filling in the n244 form

 

1 how do i wish my application to be dealt with

a:at a hearing

b:at a telephone confrence

c:without a hearing

 

2 give a time estimate for hearing/ confrence

 

what do i put here

 

3 is this agreed by all parties

 

what do i put here

 

4 give dates of trial period or fixed trial date

 

what do i put here

 

5 level of judge

 

???????? dont know what to do

 

6 parties to be served

 

what do i put here

 

i presume that all these questions in the box should be filled in by the courts

 

 

a 1

 

i get this i just put my name

 

a 2 what is thename of the order i am looking for

 

because? need help with the wording here

 

part b what evidence do i need and how do i word it so i am not admitting the debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not an area I overly familiar with, but here goes

 

You need to have your application dealt with at a hearing.

 

any county court office should be able to answer your procedural questions

 

you are looking for a set aside order, on the basis that you never received any original paperwork, or notice that the matter was going before the court. as such, you were given no opportunity to defend their claim. the debt was also statute barred and as such should not have been pursued in the first place

 

Bump for more assistance please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you leave the sections 1 – 6 blank at first. Discuss these with the court officer when you take the application in to court.

In part A, put in the name on the document you received from the Northampton County Court at (1) and cross out everything except ‘the defendant’.

At (2) write ‘to set aside the judgement’

At (3) write you “dispute the debt and that I was never served with any particulars of claim by the claimant.”

In Part B, tick part C and sign in the box as applicant. Leave the rest blank.

In part C, explain the circumstances in your own words. In particular that you never received any paperwork.

 

I suggest you post up a draft of your words for part C before submitting the form so that any further help can be given.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

heres a picture for the wording please note it is only rough if there is a better way of wording it or anything to add please let me know

 

****UPDATE*****

 

JUST phoned the court and told them we wanted a set aside order on this case "gave them the claim number" and they said that they would send a form out for us to fill in

DSC00028.jpg

DSC00029.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...