Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Norton Finace PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, We have a loan with Norton Finance and have now written to them 3 times asking for our miss-sold PPI to be returned to us each time they tell us they did not miss-sell the PPI. We now feel we have no option but to take them to court as they were not covered by the ombudsman at the time we took the loan out.

 

We were told we could only take out the loan if we took the PPI, even though my wife was already covered and I could not be covered due to my health, The PPI only lasted 5 years even though the loan was longer than that and it was all paid as part of the loan forcing us to borrow more than we wanted. We only received one set of loan papers with the optional PPI box already ticked and were never given any figures without PPI.

We have copies of their computer records and they are laughable and incomplete.

 

Any one else had dealings with Norton Finance or advice on how to proceed taking them through the small claims court? We have been offered help from companies who will take it on with a no-win no-fee and again anyone had any success this way?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Other will have to advise as far as Norton Finance are concerned, however to answer you other questions. Certainly if you had alternative cover, and you were given no option but to take the PPI, then it was missold.

 

Have a good read through the stickies at the top of the PPI forum, and you will find loads of useful information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice. We have now been told by Norton for the 3rd time!!!! that they have dealt with our complaint and see no grounds to repay our PPI. So we feel we have no option but to go to the small cliams court.

Anyone done this? any help or advice would be great.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Iv been fighting with Norton Finance since November 2006, they have told me time and time again that it was the broker a Mr coultas who actually contacted them regarding my loan, Norton Finance / London Mortgage Company provided. Iv spoke to Mr Coultas on many occasions and he has informed me that the box is always ticked up front and that Norton Finance do this so we asume that if we don't sign then we will not get the loan he also has said he would come to Court to support this if required.

 

My box was ticked for me, and we were quoted the monthly repayment including the PPI, (no other figures were quoted without the PPI) so the PPI was assumptively sold to us.

I also had a pre exsisting medical condition and also an insurance in place for £100.000 already so we did not me any PPI.

The other fact is, I did,nt know of Sterling Insurance, there was no suggestion that the insurance was with them even with all the S A R correspondance from L M C. and Nortn Finance.

I wrote a letter to Sterling on 4th January 2008 asking for 40% of it back

and yesterday received a phone call from a very nice lady offering us the 40% although she said this was not usually pratice as I should have informed Sterling when the Loan was paid of and to cancel the PPI. How could we cancel a PPI insurance if we did,nt know who it was with.

Any way will fight through the Courts for the other 60% plus interest,

but nice to have £2440 to pay some of the bills.

 

By the way the nice lady from Sterling said she did,nt even have a telehone number for us, she had to ring LMC for it as we were also not in the Directory. I would have thought that is you had a insurance with any Company they would have all your details on file

 

 

Lv Lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for the info.

Norton have said over and over they did not miss sell the PPI (they did on more that 3 points) and like you the box was ticked for us, and we were quoted the monthly repayment including the PPI, ane we also had no other figures quoted without the PPI so we are now resigned to taking them to court.

We have just sent a letter to them recorded delivery, saying that we feel we have no option but to take them to court. I'll let everyone know what happens next.

Why is that you have not taken them to court since it has gone on for so long?

Anyone else having dealings with Norton Finance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

yes, i too have had dealings with norton finance. i've had their final responce letter stating that they did not mis sell the ppi on a loan. My ppi box was also ticked on my behalf I also had assurance of £100k cover and recieve full sick pay for 6 months so didn't need the cover but they said that nemo would refuse my loan without ppi. They seem to be also relying on telephone conversations. I'm gonna SAR them to see what info they actually have. Also I did not recieve any other figures for the secured loan only those with ppi ticked as they said that I'd agreed for them to do this over the phone. I didn't have any choice! I had no idea it was gonna cost so much or that it was only for the first 5 years on a 25 year loan:mad: not sure what my next step will be? is it worth complaining to the financial ombudsman??

Your post is from Jan, hows your claim going?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our claim is still on going with Norton.

We have not be able to take them to court just yet due to lack of funds on our part.

The funny thing is, Norton Finance keep sending us mail shots stating “some time ago we had the pleasure of arranging a loan for you“! :lol: So I use their pre paid envelope to send them a letter reminding them that I will not let this go and send copies of all the letters we have sent in the one envelope, I always mark it for the attention of the Managing Director, so far they have just ignored these letters.

They treated us exactly the same as you and have effectively called us liars.:-x

When we took out the loan with them they were not covered by the ombudsman and did not record any phone calls (very convenient) but the transcripts of their calls that they sent us have huge bits missing.

As soon as we can afford it we will be taking them to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...