Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • eh? this doesn't make sense.... CCTV capture pic from 02 feb NTK 14 may.. thats not within 14 days for an ANPR capture and certain outside 29-56 if they'd ever issued a notice to drive on the windscreen. met trying to mug you here have you the pcn? dx
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Thank you for supplying information early on, that's really helpful. People should be along to advise later but in the meantime, please don't appeal. You could end up outing the driver on the day - please don't tell us who it was - and make life more complicated. Best, HB
    • 1 Date of the infringement 02nd February 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 14th May 2024 PDF scan done Redacted and Attached 3 Date received 20th May 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Not that I can see 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes? (Photo of my car entering at 23:34 on the PCN itself, and leaving at 23:57 only visible on the appeals site, but I don't see how parking for 23 minutes is against the rules anyway?) 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] N/A 7 Who is the parking company? Met Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted (346) For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA Any advice is greatly appreciated. Many thanks.   2024-05-14 MET NTK incident 2024-02-02.pdf
    • Slow down a bit, this will be OK.   You have another three days, yes?  Hopefully people will be along to advise later. HB  
    • Thank you All, i apologise for the lack of paragraphs  i'm new and unsure how to use this and cannot convert my photos of the forms  to pdf's sorry so i really don't know what do, was very stressed with everthing going on without his happening. i don't know if i should just plead guilty  online because i'm going to run out of time and worried. There's loads of forms  but it's mainly three options to plead guili don't y i want to attend court, guilty i don't want to attend court, Not guilty. and then two options to plead to the speeding offence and failure to give information. The another page for migation and others for details like earnings etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Getting Abbey to remove default


redsheep
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5669 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Me and my partner were were trying to get a mortgage together but couldnt becuase my fiancee had a £400 default notice (which was settled).

 

I have written to Abbey (copy of second letter i sent letter pasted after this ) but the reply I got back was nothing to do with the letter I sent. I got a reply that started off with something along the lines of "I note that you have asked for a copy of your bank statements and we assume this is in relation to a request to make a claim against bank charges...".

 

I have emailed 3 times (including sending an email to Sheena Small) with just a reply saying that the email will be passed on to a team to look into this. This was 2 weeks ago.

 

What can be done now?

 

Thank you,

Martin

 

Letter to Abbey;

Antony Turbitt

Manager, Banking Services

Customer Services (Banking)

PO Box 297

Bradford

BD1 4YR

 

18 October 2007

 

ACCOUNT NUMBERS: ******** and ******** (Sort Code: ** ** **)

 

Dear Sir/ Madam

 

After recently obtaining a copy of my credit file, I was concerned to note that a "Default" notice had been placed against my account.

 

I sent a letter (recorded delivery) on 5th September to which I didn’t receive a response. I then sent a follow up email to which I received a reply (TRACKING NUMBER: ) asking me to phone 0845 9 724724 to resolve my query.

 

I called this number on Saturday morning (13th October) and spoke to a Customer Advisor who tried to help but we didn’t really get anywhere. She couldn’t find any record of myself being notified about a default in the first place and then suggested that I pay £10 to have all my bank statements sent to me, which I don’t need as I already have my bank statements.

 

As I said in my original letter and email. I would just like to get this resolved as although I am paying half towards the mortgage my fiancé has we need to move somewhere bigger but can’t unless this default is removed. I would still like to bank with Abbey but all I ask is that this default is removed please.

 

I know at the time the credit report says the default was placed on my account I was overdrawn. That was at a time when I had just finished college and wasn’t working. I have now been working full time at Hampshire County Council for over 2 years and my accounts have been fine.

 

I have no recollection of ever receiving a default notice and if you are unable to remove it I would then ask that you please substantiate this information.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement to which you refer. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee.

 

2. You must supply me with a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

 

3. Any deed of assignment if the debt was sold on.

 

If you are unable to remove the default I would request that this data is provided to myself within the next 14 days, if you are unable to provide this data then I must insist that the default notice is removed from my files as unsubstantiated.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, ok, now, did she claim bank charges, or is this just a general default? if it is just a general default and you have paid it off it will be marked satisfied, that should help you. In this instance, you will not be able to get the default removed, only marked satisfied and it will be there for 6 years from the date of the default.

 

If she claimed back charges and she claimed back the same amount as the default, she might be able to get it removed.

 

Her first step is to get a copy of her credit report and see what it says. she can have a free trial at Experian and then just cancel it before the trial ends.

 

Hope this helps

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Lula.

 

She did originally claim bank charges but that was put on hold because of the trial case etc.

 

What is more imprtant to us than the bank charges is the default as this is stopping us from getting a bigger mortgage.

 

Withe regards to the default this was noted on a credit report received from Experian (but the report didnt say which of her Abbey accounts it referred to) and this was pursued as a comepletely separate matter from the bank charges.

 

I understood (from other threads) that if Abbbey had no proof of sending a default notice they had to remove it so i purused this as somethin. Is there an alternative way to pursue this as we have also claimed for bank charges?

 

The main thing is that after 2 recorded delivery letters, several phone calls and emails we are getting nowhere.

 

Any further advice will be appreciated. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have made the default removal a condition of settling your original bank charges claim. The only thing really to do now issue them again for compensation for the loss you have suffered as a result of their incorrect default notice. The loss can be quantified as the difference between the interest rate you currently pay and the rate you could have if not for their default. The claim is quite straightforward and is basically a normal bank chrges claim modified to ask for compensation rather than bank charges. It's important that you specify a time period that you are claiming compensation for, with a start date and an end date.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, I am afraid there is nothing that can be done except to check that it is marked settled on your credit report. I dont think that retrospectively getting a court to remove a default is a road that is feasible to go down and even if you did start proceedings it would take months and months EVEN if a judge would hear it before the OFT case. Sorry there isnt better news on this.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if a judge would hear it or not. Although not technically a bank charges claim it does rely on the same arguments. You could give the Financial Ombudsman Service a call and ask for their view. They won't handle a bank charges complaint, but they may look at this, especially if you emphasise the fact that Abbey have already given you your money back

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

We made the default removal a condition of settling the original bank charges claim but when we got the letter back saying about the trial we continued to pursue asking for the default to be removed (see letter in original post). I got part of the template for this letter somewhere off this site (the bit with the legal wording etc) so I was hoping it would be something that someone has done before.

 

We haven't lost anything in the way of interest it has just meant that we've only been able to get a mortgage on the basis of my salary and not both our salaries which means we own somewehre that doesnt really meet our needs and what we should be able to afford.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...