Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey National Charges


dunncha
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5907 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just been hit by a load of charges from Abbey National. Rather than go for the throat immediately I thought I would write a nicely letter and see if I can get in under the wire.

 

 

 

 

Thoughts - Observations - Pointers - Tell me I wasting my time

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir

 

In June 2007 my account went into the red by £9.50. At that time I was charged a Paid Item Fee of £30.00 and an Unauthorised Overdraft Charge of £20. I was unaware of this at the time and I was subsequently charged a further £20 on the 15-08-2007 (Unauthorised Overdraft Charge) and further charge of £20 on the 15-09-2007. (Unauthorised Overdraft Charge). Making a total charges for the £90.00

 

As soon as I became aware there was a problem I called into my nearest branch Leamington Spa to resolve the issue as soon as possible. I must compliment you on your staff as they helped me resolve the issue as best to their ability, but I eventually had to speak to somebody on the phone which worked as part of your ‘Collections’. I agreed with Collections to immediately bring my account back into credit and I was assured by the operator that all further charges would be suspended.

 

I was unhappy with the level of charges I had incurred so I contacted your customer services which agreed to refund me two of the penalty charges and reiterated to me that no further charges were pending.

 

I have subsequently received my statement for 27th September to 24th October which I have closely checked and now it appears you are to further charge me £25 Unauthorised Overdraft/Instant Overdraft Monthly Fee.

 

Why am I being charged this fee when I have been assured by your Customer Services staff on 2 separate telephone calls that no further charges pending.

 

And why is this fee £5 more expensive than previous Unauthorised Overdraft Fee.

 

I am well aware of the OFT Investigation and Court Case regarding unfair charges and the suspension of all cases relating to this but when are these charges going to stop.

 

I have already been charged not counting refunds £50.00 and with the addition of a further £25.00 I think a £75.00 accrued Penalty Charge is going beyond reasonable or fair.

 

I expect your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a good letter, I would state that you will give them 14 days to reply after which you will instigate court proceedings (presuming that you want to go this far). but I would say that if you do say this then you need to be prepared to go through with it.

 

We can help you with this, but you may get lucky, they may just refund, I have head of this happening, good luck and let us know how it goes.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

My new hobby. Abbey Baiting.

 

Ding!! Ding!! Round 2 after many letters from the Abbey claiming to be investigating my complaint (Please bear with us while we think of an excuse or you forget about this or the court case finishes) I have received a letter telling me that their charges are valid and because I have already had a partial refund I am not entitled to any more. Now please go away!!

 

So not one to let them off the hook I have penned a new letter. Reminding them of what they should have been investigating. This is the new letter.....Comments, Thoughts, pointers....

I am perfectly happy to wait until the court case decides in all our favors so don't really want to threaten court action. I'm doing this for fun8)

 

I always wanted to sign a letter 'Angry from Coventry'

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Account Charges

 

Dear Sir

 

Thank you for your reply to my complaint. I am slightly confused as you have spent 3 months investigating my complaint and have failed to answer or acknowledge the reason for my complaint.

 

The primary reason for my complaint was I was told at the time I brought my account back into credit by your Customer Services that all subsequent charges to my account had been cancelled. I was told this on two separate occasions by two separate departments. But I was still charged a further £25.00.

 

I was first told this by your Collections Department when I brought my account back into credit and subsequently by your Customer Services Department when they made their good will gesture of refunding two of my charges. I was informed the cancellation of further charges was part of this good-will gesture

 

I am sure the voice recordings made for staff training purposes will confirm this.

 

As I have stated before I am well aware of the OFT Investigation and Court Case relating to unfair bank charges which I consider this to be. I am also aware of the stay which has been placed on reclaiming by customers preventing me challenging the level of these charges.

 

What I am questioning why I was told there would be no further charges when there was, and why was this charge £5 more expensive than previous charges.

 

I note from the information leaflet you have sent me ‘Key Features and Price List’ that charges are referred to as fee’s. The statement I received from the Abbey National in Leamington Spa in October 07 refers to these fee’s as charges. This is what I consider these monies to be. Also having read very careful this leaflet I can not find any reason or justification for the charge variance. So could you please explain the variance.

 

Your reply is expected

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Banking Code.................

Hope somebody can answer this for me: I seem to remember that the Banking Code has a statement about charges being 'Fair and Transparent'

What does this Transparency mean? I have been trying to get Abbey to clarify why I have been charged monies and why there has been a variation in these charges. My final charge was £5 higher than previous charges.

Every time I write to them I get a similar letter stating that I cannot have my money back even thought I haven't asked for my money back...rather and explanation of these charges and the variation of these charges.

There seem to keep ignoring my specific questions and answering me a general non-committal way. I would like to remind them of their obligations under the banking code for transparent charging.

Have I caught them on a point which they cannot answer or am I wasting my time

:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, they will not answer you and these charges are the crux of the matter, so my advice would be to issue an LBA and then file at court.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I know it is miles too late now, but if you have received charges for just one month, I normaly call them have a heated debate and they refund me strait away. Don't take there BS and keep fighting. You must win on your first phone call or you will have to start the court process.

 

A late Simcap. (Sorry)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...