Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it is MCB    National Fraud Database Members | Preventing Fraud Losses | Cifas WWW.CIFAS.ORG.UK A range of organisations use the National Fraud Database to share data on confirmed fraud cases, preventing over £1 billion in fraud losses every year.   They are on the register  
    • Hi @LilMissM   I guess you could call me our resident CIFAS Specialist - Personally have been through all of what you have and now have come out the other side when my marker fell off in May 2023. For a start Monzo may close your account but as I had a Marker for App Fraud (Vodafone ended up making a whole hoohah of the account I had with them) - I was with them and still am from Oct 2017 till today. And not once did they close my account. I actually spoke to a couple of current account providers at the time that I had accounts with - Nationwide and Barclays - Told them what was going on and provided all the evidence to them. They advised they may do so but it was highly unlikely now that they understood why it happened and what I was doing to fight it.    Anyway - On to your marker. MCB is My Community Bank?  I can say to you that on experience that On Monday you can be on top of the world then on Tuesday you whole life changes in a flash of an eye. Suddenly you cant pay your bills, Work isnt feasible and you are left with no other choice but to scrape by.  If this has happened to you, then join the club.  - Why is this important? Well Financial institutions get one whiff of potential fraud and you are guilty without a chance to respond. You found out the hard way   If it sounds like I'm waffling, I'm not - Its important to your issue. They have deemed you guilty by the fact that no payments have been made and potentially entered into a loan agreement knowing looking not to pay (Although thats how it may appear, there will always be factors against that)    First off - Questions - What Category of Marker do you have? If unsure, check my signature for a Credit File Guide which will tell you all you need to know about what Categories apply.  - When did you raise the complaint? They will have 8 weeks to respond. More on this in a mo.  - Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan?   My next suggestions, Send this complaint to the CEOs office - CEOEMAIL.COM Let them make the decision as per the Complaint Procedure. Then if they refuse to remove the marker. take it to the FOS who can force the company to remove it if found in favour.  Some companies do need a slap or 2 once in a while to bring them down a peg. You could be looking at this right now.   
    • Other case law relied upon " On other record of reasons "
    • Page 2 – document 10 and 11 – you should include the fact that it is a Law reform commission report. Best to give it its full name if you can I suggest that you move paragraph 10 up to the first position – paragraph 5 and move everything down. I think other than that – it is good to go. I suggest you don't bother to do any more drafts. Simply rearrange the paragraphs as I suggested above then the title of the documents that you are relying on in the index page. Send it off and post your final version here so that everybody can see. I'm sorry about the delay. Thanks for reminding me
    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rinch05 v Lloyds ***WON***


Rinch05
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes your right! I dont think its got a lot to do with it ,more like we should have had eneugh to cover the penalties??I was just trying to put something of my owne in the summery?

 

Ah, I see. Yes, it would be useful to add bits like that in, the more evidance you can include that the charges are unreasonable the better.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to include Robinson Vs Harman 1848.in my documents if I mentioned it in the summery? If so where can I find it??

 

This is already summerised as part of the 'court bundle'.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am puting my court doc together and on the latest schdule we are only claiming up until the date we filed our claim right !subsequent charges will have to be recouped an another time???

 

Right. You can't add any more that have been imposed since the date of issue.

 

How are you getting on with it? Sorted yet?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fraid so! Hope you've got plenty of paper!

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/49379-photoman-lloyds-business.html

 

Finally got all my costs together, Prelim will be in the post on Wednesday, so any visits to my thread tommorow to help with the scary first steps would be much appreciated !

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry BTW.....reason I posted my last thread here was because I'm also up against Lloyds, and you guys have been there.....done it.......got the T-shirts !!

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Phone Lloyds tsb solicitors today to check if Docs 250pg were recieved & if they felt like giveing up yet??

All docd were recieved, but no white flag yet!! getting bit concerned as court is on 30th Jan!! Suppose I should get my copies of Docs together look at the court procedure bits ???:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all 1 I have today recieved a "Ganeral form of judgment or order" form N24

 

General Form of Judgment or Order

 

To the Claimant

In the

WEYMOUTH

County Court

Claim Number

6QZ67792

 

Claimant (including ref.)

 

 

Defendant (including ref.)

Lloyds Tsb Bank Plc DX36675 BRIGHTON 2

 

Date

17 January 2007

 

 

 

Before DISTRICT ( name removed ) sitting at Weymouth County Court, Westwey House, Westwey Road,Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 STE.

Upon reading the Court file and Upon the Court’s own initiative

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. Unless the Defendant do by 4pm on 25 January 2007 file and serve documents/witness statements as ordered on 13 November 2006 the defence be struck out and judgment be entered forthwith for the Claimant with costs on the claim and the hearing on 30 January 2007 be vacated.

 

 

Dated 09 January 2007

 

Fingers Crossed!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rinch, this is excellent news. Another judge is obviously sick to the back teeth of Lloyds silly abusive games.

 

Expect a settlement very soon then, or if they don't reply costs will be ordered in your favour too! Fantastic!:D

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you take no action other than to wait. Don't contact the bank or their solicitors. On 26th as soon as the ocurt opens go along there with the documents, see if anything has been filed with the court then apply for judgment.

Put the bailiffs in as soon as you get the judgment. Don't contact the bank about it. However, do contact me as I do now who to tell - and I am not very good at keeping this kind of secret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If all goes well & we get our penalty charges etc credited back to our account we will still be £1700 overdrawn with no imidiate way of paying it back!

In light of this do you think if we put the ballifs in for our claim Lloyds may decideto do the same to us??

 

After I have applied for judgment how long will it take to come ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read some threads & the mail peice about how the bailiffs seem to have bungled declan purcells claim or not??

Still not sure what to do if Lloyds ignore/wont pay etc ??

I will have to take time off to apply for judgment on fri Morning!

I need to decide what to do & how to do it by then??

I suppose you just ask at the court for the court bailiffe to recover the money??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
as I do now who to tell - and I am not very good at keeping this kind of secret.

 

Care to share that with us then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoned the court on the 26th and was informed that they had moved the hearing date as the defendant was going to settle ???????

& yes yes another sucess Lloyds have payed up !!!!

well all but £40 ish?? So I thaught??

So I phoned to query this point with there solicitors who phoned back to say they made it £80 was still owing ?? BONUS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...