Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Renewal declined now defaulted !!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Pat/Bernie and Goldie I am going to send the letter draughted by Bernie and also send a copy of the new policy.

 

One Call insurance are not nice people to do business with and change DD instructions willy Nilly BEWARE!!

 

I will update this post with the outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad: My insurance renewal quote from One call insurance went from £330 to £980 so I said no thanks. Then they took two payments in Aug and Sept.

 

I contacted them and asked what they were doing and they said I had to proove I no longer had the car and required the policy.

I said the onus is not me to correct the mistake and they refused to refund me.

 

I contacted my bank who said they would investigate and they refunded me the payments and advised I cancel the DD.

 

Now the broker one -call has sent me a letter saying under section 87(1) of the consumer credit act I have been defaulted.

 

What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cisco

 

Did you take insurance with another company then instead? & did you tell One Call that you didn't wish to renew the policy?

 

If you've got insurance with another insurer, then by simply sending them a copy of the new certificate should suffice. And if you told them you did not wish to renew, they should not have continued to take payments from your bank. However, if you didn't tell them to cancel the insurance & assumed it would automatically cancel, then they were within their rights to continue to take premiums as most policies auto renew unless you say otherwise. However, as I said, if you can provide them with evidence that another insurance was in place or that you sold your vehicle, they should go away & stop pestering you!

 

You have to remember though, from their point of view, if you didn't tell them you wanted to cancel the policy, but are now telling them you didn't want to renew, you may have been on cover with that vehicle for the last few months but are now expecting a refund. So as long as you can provide evidence that you either a) didn't need insurance or b) had insurance elsewhere - you should be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for post in reply, I told them categorically that I would not be taking a renewal and this is on their file.

 

I do have another policy which I would send them, however the whole incident is questionable conduct as I am concerned.

 

The point of being defaulted is my concern and any company who throws these defaults around Willy-Nilly so to speak are doing so simply to spite people who excercise freedom of choice.

 

The fact my bank has reimbursed the payments makes a case against the justification of unauthorised withdrawals.

I have not signed to authorise any payments and certainly have not signed any documents or mandates regarding a renewal.

 

Call centre staff have quoted the conversation I had with them when I said that I would not be renewing.

 

Thanks again GoldyR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I don't know the technicalities of being defaulted but I would write to them as follows.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Re Policy No: [x] Renewal Date [dd mmmm yyyy]

 

I am writing to you to complain about your handling of my declination to renew my insurance with you.

 

Your staff have confirmed that your records confirm that I declined your invitation to renew. No further action should have been required from me.

 

However, you ignored these instructions and continued to take funds from my bank account. I have now recovered these funds using the Direct Debit Guarantee.

 

You have now written to me saying that under section 87(1) of the consumer credit act I have been defaulted.

 

I am in default of nothing. Could you please deliver to me within fourteen days of the date of this letter a letter confirming that you have cancelled this default and that you have unravelled any notice to any credit reference agencies or any other impact whatsoever on me as a result of this action taken by you.

 

Yours faithfully

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

O.K today I received a letter from ONE- CALL in DONCASTER informing me they have cancelled my insurance as of 30/10/2007

 

They are demanding £341

Charge for cover =£202 days (84 days)

Policy fee =£14

Legal cover =£24

Breakdown cover =£34 (Never asked for this cover in first place)

Charge (default or admin fee) £65.41

 

I have 14 days to pay and ONE-CALL say they can renew my cover even when I said I did not want to be renewed before renewal date.

THEY SAY THEY ARE AUTHORISED BY FSA - if thats the case then the LAW MUST CHANGE!!

 

I said I would send them a policy I have on a new car taken out before the renewal date was due with ONE-CALL, they said they would not accept this after telling me on a previous occasion they would accept it !!

 

THEY INSIST I WRITE TO DVLA AND OBTAIN A LETTER FOR THEM SHOWING I TRANSFERRED OWNERSHIP OF THE CAR INSURED BY ONE-CALL BEFORE THE POLICY WAS RENEWED.

 

ANYONE WHO THINKS THIS IS GOOD CONDUCT NEEDS A SHRINK !! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said previously, to resolve this situation amicably you should provide them with a copy of your new insurance certificate. It's all very well saying 'it's none of their damn business' but this attitude isn't going to get you anywhere & will just prolong the angst for you.

 

If you want to get this resolved & move on to more important things in life, then do the necessary & resolve never to go near this company again. Far too many people spend hours of their precious lives argueing over a 'principle' with a company, what is the point?! :confused:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think you need to insist that the matter is dealt with by their internal complaints team if its not already been done so. They should send you a "final letter" outlining their final response on the matter and details of how to contact the ombudsman. Insist that you have this, and if their response is still not satisfactory then take your complaint up with the ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm

 

I would do a s78 request for a copy of the agreement where you signed to agree to pay such monies - I would imagine they would only have a signature for last year

 

At the same time send them a copy of the new insurance

 

And also tell them failure to remove the default will result in you issuing court proceedings for damages via defamation and harassment

 

 

What an utter bunch of ******'s

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...