Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • read the above again carefully and respond as directed. its all you will have to do then the situation is almost guaranteed to be rolled back to as if you'd only just received paperwork, regardless to them not receiving your completed NIP. dx
    • Theclaw 123. As you will have realised by the above query from Honeybee, your post contained an important error that totally changed the meaning of what you were saying. It is important that when dealing with legal/government matters, that you check and recheck, what you are writing. I have noticed that errors have appeared in your previous posts, be they typo's or missed words, so I would again urge you to check what you are typing before submitting. When writing something of true import, I find it best to compose in a Word document so as to be able to correct, add or delete as necessary, before 'copy and pasting' into the relevant box/form. I can understand that you are under pressure, stress, due to current personal situations, so it is even more important to pause, take time to check and allow your brain to regather its thoughts when composing important replies; as the person on the other end of the communication is not interested in your personal situation, just what you are writing in relation to the offences disclosed.
    • 1. yes 2.no 3. your call and keep reading up here on like threads you'll soon get the idea. dx  
    • Hi all, I sent a copy of the court bundle to the 2 email addresses provided by JK and followed the instructions to change the hyphenated é to a normal e in the email address. This has worked as I have not received an undeliverable email saying that the email does not exist. As per my previous posts, a copy of the court bundle has also been sent by post to the court and to Evri.
    • Thank you. bankfodder The car was purchased unseen, yes. It was from another branch of Arnold Clark in Glasgow and I purchased it from their Nottingham branch. The first time I saw the car in person was on handover. It came with an MOT, carried out by Arnold Clark in Glasgow on 18th March this year. I'm just travelling so will add some photos later on this evening.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

philp v First Direct


philp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, what a great site. Finally got off my backside and sent DPA letter {rec delivery] on 23/6/06. I found two years of statements on line and they owe me £606 with interest! Can't wait to see what they owe me after six years. I'll let you know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update. Had a reply from Linda Young-Data Security Manager, saying charges info on route via courier,signature req..etc. Here's your tenner back. So far so good

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi good people, Statements arrived on the 6/07/06. They owe me £1219, letter asking for it back taken from templates library, gonna post it in the A.M. I kind of hope they don't pay up straight away, then I can add on the 8%. Lets see what happens!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right. I didn't get a reply for the "letter asking for it back" within 14 days, In fact they had 21 days! but still they couldn't oblige. Perhaps they are a little snowed under. So i sent my L.B.A. on the 31/7/06 Then would you believe it I had the standard reply letter to my first letter dated 26/7/06 but \I got it on 1/8/06, six days seems a long time for second class. Ready to do my moneyclaim on 13/8/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, seems like we are on the same track, sent first letter £2986 owing on 12/7 , recieved standard "no its you that has run up charges "letter 14/7 sent lba 24/7 then this am recieved a letter stating that I need to complain to banking ombudsman , moneyclaim is all prepared online to send next weds, will let you know , good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Had a letter from Northampton CC (22/08/06)- DG solicitors intend to defend all of this claim. Then in the very same batch of post a letter from DG offering me half! In the meantime FD 'stole' another £80 from me. So I 'phoned them up asking for it back, got put through to a nice lady, she said we won't give it back,so I said 'no problem' (intending to add it to my claim). She became a little upset that I wouldn't argue or rant and rave at her. She ended up saying 'why won't you discuss this matter with me'? IN the and I had to make my excusses to get rid of her. So I wrote to DG with-'half will be ok as an interim payment, but i'm still claiming the remainder, and by the way your clients have***** another £80 off me please add it to the total'. I'll see their response before ammending my claim with the court-they might save themselves an additional £35 in costs.

 

Edited;please dont use libelous words !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ant, I listed First Direct PLC. That seemed to be OK as far as the court are concerned. DG solicitors refer to their clients as HSBC Bank plc (trading as First Direct) I guess either will be OK. Go for it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Philip - just about to proceed to 2nd letter with First Direct, and certainly awaiting your outcome. My daughter put me on to this site, as I have about £2500 over 6 years. She just got her money back after moneyclaims on line to Nationwide - but then they asked her to close the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...