Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA Requests non compliance, what next?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi lihl,Yep, well nearly, my complaint is with Trading Standards and the Information Commissioners Office

im going for default removal based upon the view that firstly my credit file refers expressly to the fact that i have failed to keep to my credit agreement and since no credit agreement exsists i cannot concievably have failed to keep to it. therefore the info on my credit file is inaccurate and not in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi lihl,Yep, well nearly, my complaint is with Trading Standards and the Information Commissioners Office

im going for default removal based upon the view that firstly my credit file refers expressly to the fact that i have failed to keep to my credit agreement and since no credit agreement exsists i cannot concievablt have failed ot keep to it. therefore the info on my credit file is inaccurate and not in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998

 

If my route fails I promise to steal your literature file, photocopy every single last letter :) (and then return the file of course).

I love CAG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

PT I know is currently dealing with the oft (I think) regarding defaults on unenforceable debt and has excellent and interesting views, I am going down the route of the link included Remove Default Notices on a Credit File - We show you how for removal of defaults.

 

Hi lihi/all,

 

Sorry to barge in on the thread. ;)

 

I have a quick question..

 

I've looked at the link above and was wondering if default removal is worthwhile trying for if the debt (without CCA after usual time scale) is not 'satisfied' as the example used is for a 'satisfied' debt?

 

If that makes sense? :???:

 

Thanks in advance,

 

iwcmd. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well, the letter that i was hoping would never arrive has just dropped on my doormat. £10k credit card final notice telling me they are going to take me to court for a judgement. it is blair oliver and scott or halifax and they have NOT complied with the CCA request sent on september 6th. any advice please. looks like i am at the business end of fighting this now. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lihi/all,

 

Sorry to barge in on the thread. ;)

 

I have a quick question..

 

I've looked at the link above and was wondering if default removal is worthwhile trying for if the debt (without CCA after usual time scale) is not 'satisfied' as the example used is for a 'satisfied' debt?

 

Yes it does make sense, IMHO, anything is worth a try

 

the fact that this procedure relates to a satisfied debt is fairly irrelevant and the letters are adaptable to suit your circumstance.

 

a default on your credit file is just as damaging in my opinion as a CCJ so any chance you have to remove them is worth taking

 

if you need any help with this, start your own thread or post a link to it if you already have and there are many people on here who can offer you help and advice

 

regards

 

paul

 

If that makes sense? :???:

 

Thanks in advance,

 

iwcmd. :)

...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Now to add to this thread and debate...pt has mentioned that the link applied to a satisfied debt, well the reactions I have been getting from my crditors regarding settled debts is they do not need to keep the agreement as the debt is satisfied...

 

So are you guys saying that unless they keep the agreement they cannot enforce data processing? I am really confused now as I though the link refered to a chased debt. That would make far more sense to me. If the debt is settled then sure they can argue you paid up so why are you looking for the agreeement now?

 

Just another angle and I am interested in this as I have loads of "satisfied" defaults where the creditors do not hold the CCA anymore.

 

Thanks,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

could i get an answer to my last question please?

 

Hi,

 

I suggest you write to them and inform them that you have requested a copy of the agreement and enclose a copy of the letter you sent. I assume you sent it to the same people or are these guys different? In the meantime get aquainted with the following thread as you will need to use it:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/108467-basic-introduction-consumer-credit.html

 

Hope this helps,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the letter that i was hoping would never arrive has just dropped on my doormat. £10k credit card final notice telling me they are going to take me to court for a judgement. it is blair oliver and scott or halifax and they have NOT complied with the CCA request sent on september 6th. any advice please. looks like i am at the business end of fighting this now. :eek:

 

 

Hi Blueeyedboy,

 

my apologies for not responding earlier,

 

can i just check what if anything they have sent in response to your CCA request

 

i can advise you better once i know what we are responding to

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

could i get an answer to my last question please?

Hello Blueyedboy,

I thimk Penfold seems to be putting you on the right lines.

He seems to have a good knowledge of your problem.

Best Wishes and Good Luck.

Please Click My Scales,Thank You very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blueeyed boy, are you able to scan or to type the letter threatening court action? Sometimes these letters are worded in such a way to suggest that they will commence court procedings against you, so that you pay up! Also continue with the advice already in answer to your question, but seeing a copy of this letter they have sent could be helpful!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm sorry to all who have been trying to help me. I have had computer trouble recently and have been unable to read your replies.

 

I dont have a scanner to scan the reply but i will buy one asap.

 

They have not tried to comply at all. no letters have been received from them at all.

 

I received a card a while back from PO saying unknown had sent a letter and not paid postage. so maybe that was it but if they didn't pay postage then me not paying it for them and collecting the letter isn't going to cause me a problem is it?

 

I'll look forward to your replies.

 

Thank you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs,

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I note that to date you have not complied with my request for a copy of the credit agreement for this alleged debt which you are pursuing me for

The Consumer Credit Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter.

 

My request remains outstanding. Without production of the said agreement I am unable to asses if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to you, nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’.

 

I still require you to send me a true copy of the original credit agreement that you allege exists. As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until xx/xx.2007 to provide me with the true copy I requested. You are now in default of my request. Any account I hold with you is now in legal dispute. Whilst the account remains in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agency.

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the customer to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office

 

The time limits, which are laid down in the Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 are clear. You must supply an executed credit agreement within 12 + 2 working days of a proper CCA request. If you fail to comply with a legitimate request the account enters a default situation and if you fail to comply after a further 30 days you commit an offence. If you continue to try to enforce this debt without complying with my original request you will have committed a criminal offence and your conduct will be reported to the Office of Fair Trading, the Financial Ombudsman and Trading Standards. Any investigation undertaken by them may affect your ability to offer credit in the future.

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Whilst you remain in default of my request, you are not permitted to take any action against this account. This includes adding further charges and passing any information to the credit reference agencies.

 

Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

you could try something along these lines

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

no sept.

 

september they entered the default by failing to provide the agreement within the required time frame.

 

dont worry about the criminal offence for now, the criminal offence would have been committed in october but its the failure to supply the document in the 12 working days which we are concerned with for now

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have just received a letter from a debt collection agent chasing a debt that the cca request is in default on. i called them to advise them the debt is in dispute and no original documents had been forwarded to me since this request and they very nastily told me that I took out the debt therefore i should face the consequences and bailiffs will be round at some point.

 

should i cca request this new company or have i already done what i should have by cca requesting from the original creditor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHAT UTTER BALL HOOKS!!!!!!!!

 

Bailiffs, yeah right in their dreams

 

bailiffs wont become involved until they have been to court, won and you failed to pay after judgment so they are a little ahead of themselves

 

AND THAT AINT GONNA HAPPEN, not unless a court, ignores the CCA 1974,the regulations made under it and the House of Lords Rulings in wilson

 

which aint gonna happen unless the judge is mad

 

you have sent a CCA request yes? you have proof of delivery yes?

 

if this is correct then you dont need to send them another request as the first remains valid

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,

 

well nowt to worry about, the thing not to do is Phone these people as they will try to get you to agree to all sorts of things

 

 

if you sent the letter i posted in post 41 then you have done all that is reasonable to bring this dispute to their attention so what more can you do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...