Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bad News For All Members With O/s Debt


Oh Boy!
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As some of you may know the government has in the pipe line new

 

enforcement laws, apart from the bailiffss right to break into your home,

 

the most TERRIBLE & HORRID new law to pass is called the DATA DISCLOSURE ORDER.

 

What this means is that if you have a debt that you cant pay, the DCA will be able to apply to the court to establish if you have bank accounts and credit cards, and a request to Inland Revenue who will be asked to release information on your current employment and address, this way the DCA will be always in a postion to track you for the life of the debt.

 

That is to say if the DCA has a Attachment of Earnings order, it will be sent direct to the employer, if for some reason you leave that work and move to a new company, then the Inland Revenue will grass you up to the court, and a new Attachment will be made to your new company effectiviely screwing your new reputation at your new work place.

 

At present if a defendant leaves current employment and his whereabouts is unknown the debt is written off, when this new law comes in we are going to be stuck with debts for life, i can see bankruptcies rising 100 fold.

 

[offensive]

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a link to this information or is it hearsay?

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a link to this information or is it hearsay?

 

Is it the same Bill mentioned in this "sticky"?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/47908-new-bill-introduced-parliament.html

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't affect me - was skint, still skint:D

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

At present if a defendant leaves current employment and his whereabouts is unknown the debt is written off, when this new law comes in we are going to be stuck with debts for life, i can see bankruptcies rising 100 fold.

 

Not neccasarily true, for an attachment of earnings to be in place first there would have been a CCJ, which has many methods of enforcement.

 

CAG does not and will not ever condone debt avoidance.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

House of Commons - Constitutional Affairs - First Report

  • Data Disclosure Orders

The Data Disclosure Order (DDO) would be a new mechanism enabling the court to seek information on a judgment debtor who had failed either to respond to the judgement or to comply with court-based methods of enforcement. Information would be sought from relevant third parties in both the public (HMRC and DWP) and private (banks and credit reference agencies) sectors, to help the creditor make an informed choice about how to enforce a judgment. Clear constraints would be imposed on the secondary use of data. Any personal data obtained and used under statutory powers for the purposes of enforcement would not be used or stored for secondary purposes. Information obtained by a DDO would only be used to enforce civil judgements, which are orders of the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Darn, that weren't the link I was looking for ... Sequenci posted some link recently to new proposals which I read but did not bookmark.

 

:confused:

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, thanks Michael - must learn to type faster

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid, as everyone knows no one opens the door to the bailiff, now creditors will not give a monkeys if the bailiff collected or not, bailiffs or at least the county court bailiff is obliged to make three visits, then return the warrant back, more often than not a "unable to confirm defendant as resident", this will then be sufficient for the creditor to apply to the court.

 

It really sickens me! Sad day for all (when it comes in).

 

Quite right that CAG do not condone, but if we where not playing war games the country and its citizens would have lots of cash, so therefore we would never have to pay £400000000 for a litre of diesel, and spend £5.00 on a can of coke hence be able to pay that dam credit card of.

 

YOU CAN'T PAY IT IF YOU AINT GOT IT.:evil:

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

But can you give us the relevant link to the new proposals please, oh boy?

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Michael

 

I'm assuming this is going to be pretty much the same as the 2005 link I was reading earlier. Would be good if somebody could provide us with a summary of how it affects us. Not me though. :p

 

The most important thing, IMO, is that, as it is an Act - when does it come into force? And how does it change our rights? Maybe somebody here (Sequenci?) already knows this? I've bookmarked it, and I'll try to have a look at it, but my research is with regard to public policies and rights in general - I'm no expert in debt.

 

I'd be interested though, if anybody knew.

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Nitro, i quite agree, problem is that so many thousands of public have been advised never to open the door to the bailiff, that the claimants are going to have no alternative but to request a DDO, thats whats scary.

 

Then again how long is it going to be before the claimants start refusing reasonable sums so that they can take a real look into your financial affairs, because at the moment, the claimants (creditor) has to accept what they are told by the debtor about their financial affairs, it could be a total lie, i know for a fact that some friends had told bank that they where on the dole, the creditor had no choice but to accept, now to find the truth they can refuse to accept payments.

 

I'm sorry but its something that has been overlooked by people in the right places. DISGRACEFUL!

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a quick look at the Act, which was passed in July but will not be in force until various regulations are passed - that can take ages.

The sections about Information Orders and Disclosure by the tax man etc apply AFTER a CCJ has been granted and appear to be designed to assist when a debtor is evading the enforcement of a judgement. Tough on debtors but surely only where they are avoiding the Court.

Far more interesting - and I think helpful- are the sections about Debt management Plans. I don't think the debt management and IVA industry needed a boost but it seems to have got one with a regularisation of DMP. What appears to be good is that creditors can't bring bankruptcy proceedings or take enforcement action if a DMP is in place. Should stop some of our more obnoxious 'friends' hounding people demanding more than they should get under the Plan.

How it will play out I think only time will tell but it might be useful if someone more knowledgeable and more time could have a good look at the Act.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

What appears to be good is that creditors can't bring bankruptcy proceedings or take enforcement action if a DMP is in place. Should stop some of our more obnoxious 'friends' hounding people demanding more than they should get under the Plan.

 

Now that really is good news - the sooner the better.

 

As for the rest of it, I think it's aimed at those who choose to ignore court orders. A growing number of people do, and those that move around a lot tend to get away with it. I don't think it will make any real difference to the overwhelming majority of people.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I haven't got time to read up on it at the moment, does it only relate to DMP's set up via an intermediary or do you think it would apply to arrangements made by the debtor in person as well?

 

Thanks

Goldlady

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its going to be for people who are subject to attachment of earnings, perhaps not people who are already paying their debts

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...