Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Northern Rock Debt sold to Fairmile Recoveries


limpetlad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I too have recieved another letter from them today, stating they will put a charge on my house, make me go to Crown court and answer to a Judge. The debt they are asking for does not exist. When Northern Rock sold my house the shortfall was covered by endowments. I received a letter from their Solicitor stating the balances and surprisingly enough there was nothing left after fees etc had been taken out but the outstanding debt to NR was cleared.

Untill this debt was cleared i could not be dissacociated from my ex husband, so once this debt had been removed from my credit file, i was given a brand new clean credit file.

I have just checked this file online and it shows only my present mortgage, my small outstanding credit card balance and my accounts. I do Not owe anything else.

Do I ignore this latest letter or let them take me to court to see if they can prove otherwise.

Unfortunately after 5 years i got rid off all old paperwork as i never thought i would need it again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

Hope someone will read this with the benefit of qualification, experience, or foresight!

 

I'm deliberately being vague-ish in case some of the DCA pond life read these posts (I would be surprised if they didnt)

 

A "Friend" is currently being chased by these gonks over an alleged Northern Rock repo debt which arose in 1999.

 

To snip a bit, we SAR'd the DCA and recently received an A4 envelope containing copies of letters sent by NR up to 1999, then a gap of nearly EIGHT years till the NOA from NR (original NOT received by my friend) dated 2007.

 

1) The SAR results were received ordinary mail (damaged, too, although apparently without loss), not Recorded after 4 weeks. Should my friend treat the documentation as Not Received since there exists no proof that it has ever been delivered? (as per LOP act)

2) Would failure of the DCA to prove service of said SAR documents within the statutory 40 days be sufficient grounds (in court) to lose their case?

3) Although we don't know what my friend's ex-spouse has been telling (or even paying) the DCA, would the lack of any reference in the SAR to any communication whatsoever between 1999 and 2007 constitute grounds that both NR and the DCA have breached CML code of practice of not pursuing debts where no contact has been made for 6+ years?

 

My friends next move is to wait for DCA to make contact again, and reinforce previous letter that they are acting outside CML policy (which duty they inherited from the Principal)

 

Meantime, we will be contacting NR to ascertain if any Mortgage Indemnity Policy was enacted on repossession, as well as making a formal complaint to NR that no correspondence was received from them in 8 years despite them having full knowledge of my friends subsequent address.

 

I would really welcome any comments - good and bad - as based on the above assumptions my friends position is that they won't pay a penny unless legally obliged.

 

Thanks (to everyone for a Brilliant website)

 

the Arctic Wanderer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have recieved another letter from them today, stating they will put a charge on my house, make me go to Crown court and answer to a Judge. The debt they are asking for does not exist. When Northern Rock sold my house the shortfall was covered by endowments. I received a letter from their Solicitor stating the balances and surprisingly enough there was nothing left after fees etc had been taken out but the outstanding debt to NR was cleared.

Untill this debt was cleared i could not be dissacociated from my ex husband, so once this debt had been removed from my credit file, i was given a brand new clean credit file.

I have just checked this file online and it shows only my present mortgage, my small outstanding credit card balance and my accounts. I do Not owe anything else.

Do I ignore this latest letter or let them take me to court to see if they can prove otherwise.

Unfortunately after 5 years i got rid off all old paperwork as i never thought i would need it again.

 

They are talking total rubbish, the Crown court is a criminal court, this is not a criminal matter, i would ignore this rubbish from these idiots, and get on with life.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

As you can see, my last post when I last head from these people, was last October, but today mI have had a lovely little note saying I am going to have a 'potential hime vist' That should be interesting!! Anyone else had a home vist from ARuk?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ellijay,

 

Oddly enough, my mate SAR'd these scumbags in Sept 2008 and received the requested info in Oct 2008. Since then, not a whisper. She assumes that they've managed to locate and squeeze something out of the lowlife ex-husband, but we heard that he'd lost his job recently, and is not known for taking financial commitments too seriously.

 

 

PM me if you need any details, Id rather not post the minutiae here as I'm sure the pond lifers read these posts too.

 

Regarding home visits, please see

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

Warmest regards.... the Arctic Wanderer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Need response very quickly everyone.

 

Asking on behalf of a friend, he had a mortgage, property was repossessed. This was easily 12 years ago, yet now he finds himself being sent letters by ARUK wanting money off him. He didn't have any knowledge of owing anyone any funds, thinking repossession was the end of any financial implications.

 

Are they able to ask for anything after such a long period of time? 12 years without any word from them at all!

 

Many thanks Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any mortgage shortfall would be Statute Barred after 12 years. Send them this; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt make them prove a debt exists and they have the right to collect although you may have to send a SAR to the original creditor at a later date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mortgage debt statute barred after 12 years without acknowledgement. Council of Mortgage Code of Practice states (verbatim)

“From 1 February 2000, lenders who are members of The Council of Mortgage Lenders have agreed voluntarily that they will begin all recovery action for the shortfall within the first six years following the sale of a property in repossession. Anyone whose property was taken into possession and sold more than 6 years ago, and who has not been contacted by their lender about recovering any outstanding debt will not now be asked to pay the shortfall”.

 

The CML statement of Practice also addresses the assignment of debts in section 32 “If the mortgage shortfall debt has been assigned to another company, the principles of this statement will continue to apply"

 

Following up to my original posting in this thread, we've heard nothing from these parasites (Dominic Powell - Fairmile Recoveries) since Oct 2008 when they sent through the SAR material - and Hey Presto! - no record of contact on this account in 9 years!

 

I heard recently that Northern Rock was allegedly in bother for hiding over 2000 toxic mortgage accounts from shareholders.

 

They are fishing, don't worry!

 

hope this helps

 

the arctic wanderer

Edited by Nordkapp
incorrect acronym!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi All,

 

guess what, it's back again this time with Arrow Global who have been assigned the 'debt' from Fairmile via Drydensfairfax Solicitors.

 

This time they have added an income and expenditure form.

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

 

Do I just send on the last stuff or just ignore this as have not had anything from Fairmile for a couple of years now??

 

 

Muchas

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...