Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black horse issued default and now gone to court


charlie41dimmock
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

black horse issued default notice, taken husband to court, didn't get our defence back in time, court issued us to pay back over 3 grand for car loan (when we gave it back well over a year ago, assumed dept repaid, at no time informed us how much sold for even when we asked them for info,) at 255 a month and gave us 2 days to pay first payment, we dont have that kind of money spare, on the letter it says attachment of earnings, or court bailiff to enter home and take and sell belongings, is that true or are they trying to scare us, husband is worried that they will come when he's at work and I will have to deal with them, not good for my breakdown recovery. We have nothing of value, just ordinary furniture,

please advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the date the judgement for claimant was issued? You can apply for something called redetermination within 14 days and there is no court fee to pay. It basically asks the court to look at your circumstances and accept a reduced offer of payment based on what you can afford.

 

You mention defending the claim - you can only do this if you can prove that you don't owe some or all of the money ( you can also partly defend' ). Was this a HP agreement or a loan? When was the original agreement taken out and for how much? If you do have a valid defence you could try to apply for a 'set aside' which puts the CCJ back to the claim stage. But you would need to have good reason for not having defended within the usual time...

 

Meanwhile, just to put your mind at rest - further enforcement such as attachment of earnings bailiffs etc are possible once you default ie don't pay on a CCJ. This involves the creditor applying to the court for action to be taken so it's not an immediate threat to you. County Court bailiffs have no powers of forced entry so as long as you do not let them in and they don't gain 'peaceful ' entry through unlocked or open door or window they cannot force entry. Post with more detail on your type of agreement & amounts involved etc so we can try to help

Link to post
Share on other sites

We get so many dept letters from a few places people, gats confusing, we were out of time by the time we managed to get some advice on it, was left in the dept pile for a few days also on the tv, did respond saying handed car back etc, just recieved letter today from court saying 'defence out of time. Default judgement entered 18 sept.'

 

'Claimant Black horse claims payment of balance due of 3,765.83 under credit agreement dated 06/12/01 made between black horse and defendant.'

 

court order repayment notice sentby solicitors Sechiari etc.

 

So can we sar/cca them still for info of dates interest etc, how much car sold for, as voluntary return of car or they would take us to court so they said.

 

Just read the letter again from the solicitors, mentions attachment of earnings, if they take the 255 thats we only just get by now.

 

'bancrupcy receiver will be appointed and all of your assetts will be sold to pay your depts',

we have none, just 2 old bangers from the auction worth 200 quid. and we need them for work etc.

'These will all incurre more costs which u will have to pay.'

 

'please note our client may be prepared to offer a rebate on an ex gratia basis to any customer who can settle dept in full.'

 

we have no savings or insurance policies to cash in, nowt.

 

Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have any experience of these circumstances, I would reccomend that you contact National Debtline England & Wales | Contact National Debtline They will certainly have someone who will know. It is OK to call them they are just great really helpful to me and others.

 

Good Luck - DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its the court form you are refering to no, as we dont see we should have to pay more as given car back and the dept is bigger than amount owed before, so they can go and jump, plus have other depts trying to sort out and cant afford to pay any amount to them, did think of bancrupcy, but that costs too ,as hubby working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can and should have the CCJ set aside because if I know BH there will be loads of unlawful collection and late payment fees in that figure. Another poster here successfully applied for a set aside on the grounds that the claim included unlawful charges and the judgment was thus for the wrong sum. Unfortunately you will have to pay them something in the end but if you go through with all the proper court procedures it will probably end up just being token monthly payments.

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...