JonCris
-
Posts
10,839 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by JonCris
-
If we followed your advice then no one would seek justice There's always been & there always will be a litigation risk & it's for them to prove he smoked not for him to prove he didn't Also its a small claim so no costs are applied
-
So no precedent then & incidentally;) Go Debt have just had £1.2 million value of agreements judged as unenforceable:D
-
Who stopped you?. Parking is a civil matter but Manchester police have until very recently been stopping motorists for unpaid tickets the info being fed into the ANPR by the councils debt collectors . They have been reminded that this is unlawful & are supposed to have stopped The police had justified their actions by claiming those who don't pay parking tickets etc are more likely to be involved in crime so are fair targets for stop & search. Why they should then contact the debt collectors & hold you there until they arrive who then force you to pay is anyone's guess:rolleyes:
-
Riser/Recliner and mobility ramp required
JonCris replied to Surfer01's topic in Special needs, Disability etc
I know of an electric lift recliner but its awaiting probate -
Riser/Recliner and mobility ramp required
JonCris replied to Surfer01's topic in Special needs, Disability etc
Ebay? -
"CAB are advising me it would be difficult as my needs are 100% mobility and 0% care" I really do despair of CAB sometimes the blue badge is ALL about mobility. Its got nothing to do with CARE Many blue badge holders live independent lives thanks in part to their blue badge I have one & I find its of great benefit I just make absolutely sure I don't abuse it
-
Find a friendly (cheap) auto electrician & ask him/her to have quick look (don't let him do any repair without Motability's consent) you'll be amazed how a franchise dealer can so often miss an obvious fault simply because they haven't thought outside the box
-
Riser/Recliner and mobility ramp required
JonCris replied to Surfer01's topic in Special needs, Disability etc
I agree & as much as I hate to admit it ebay is the answer. Bought the following fully reclining chair £100 with phone & electric heat & massager, electric self contained rechargeable battery bath chair £115 lift 25 stone max, NEW self propelled completely collapsible wheelchair WITH independent suspension £68 + next day delivery £15 = £83 -
Bump added above
-
The reason you not getting many posts is because those that are disputing the actions of firms like RLP are not posting. They know that such firms read this & other forums & they don't want to expose their strategy to the oppositions scrutiny. On each occasion it has been exposed some of these firms have altered even their web site to remove any so called ambiguity. Nevertheless we do expect that one day soon there may be an opportunity to publicize matters
-
I have already answered your question re CCTV
-
If a creditor offers full & final settlement which you accept & they don't remove ALL adverse data then it can be successfully argued that they have breached said agreement. Reason full & FINAL means just that final & adverse data or data of any kind which appertains to that former debt means matters are ongoing
-
Of course they do but it's on the assumption by the Card Company that the card holder has had an opportunity to dispute the charge AND that the 'evidence' was & is available to justify the charge
-
UNLESS you act promptly they will state the CCTV is no longer available AND your data will be processed to whoever pays them such as a prospective employer, insurer, lender AND should there be any other adverse (or mistaken) data on another website there's the possibility you could appear on a terrorist data base monitoring unusual behaviour Adverse data never dies it remains in the system virtually for ever
-
With any litigation there's a risk but the OP doesn't want to pay their unfairly applied charge. So what should he do 'pay up & shut up' as some here seem to be suggesting or fight remember its because of the latter that sites like CAG exist. I've always assumed that to NOT fight such unfairness/extortion wasn't in the CAG genes
-
Also forget the argument about when they sent the letter that's a red herring. It was sent after the event & after the 'evidence' was gone so has no force whatsoever.. Thought;) You could always demand to see the 'evidence'
-
Its wrong in law many car hire firms who bill customers for additional costs AFTER the car has been returned & it has not been checked in the presence of the hirer have been challenged & made by the courts to refund the money For their CC to be enforceable the customer MUST be given the opportunity to dispute their allegation failing which their CC can be successfully challenged Sending a letter after the evidence has been disposed of means said letter has no force in law
-
Why not is your advice (which is all negative by the way & incorrect in law ) to be anymore trusted than mine
-
Either way your details WILL go on their database formerly called "The largest data base in the UK of 'dishonest people" to which they later added "some of whom have not been convicted" ... and which they now call a "data base of people who have been 'involved' (my emphasis) in civil recovery"
-
PPI Complaint with Welcome Finance via FOS Lost
JonCris replied to Laitty's topic in Welcome Finance
PS also demand that as you believe their decision to be fundamentally wrong & intend issuing legal proceedings you require detailed reasons for their rejection of your claim This often gets them to take a second look & your claim may even go up the FOS food chain to someone who know what they are doing -
PPI Complaint with Welcome Finance via FOS Lost
JonCris replied to Laitty's topic in Welcome Finance
Sorry but the FOS are a joke & aren't binding anyway They are often overturned by the courts. Send Welcome an LBA threatening to commence proceedings -
PS spend some time & read the many RLP threads
-
AS you propose go to CAB
-
What if i dont pay RLP?
JonCris replied to Rawrr's topic in Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations.
Only if they are under arrest & this is 'just' an interview NOT an interview under caution so no caveat is required............. however they may make an arrest when she presents herself on the day. Its an old trick "come for a chat" & when you do your arrested. The chat then takes on a whole new meaning also its more than likely that you will not have instructed a lawyer & as it can take hours before one is available you will be threatened with a prolonged lock up ........... unless of course "you want to clear matters up NOW. Make a statement then you can go home" They always seem to make reference to your being allowed to 'go home' -
What if i dont pay RLP?
JonCris replied to Rawrr's topic in Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations.
Already have see my previous post;)
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS