So that your thread don't get lost in this huge thread, I will ask the site team to start one of your own so then we will always be able to find it.

I haven't read the thread completely, but got a cry for help and a short version from gh. TBH, I've always wondered about the service of documents - there isn't anything declared as being the standard required, and you've applied what should have been considered as a 'cross-read' from another area of law, which seems reasonable to me, I have to say. I guess it's all down to the Judge having to decide if the interpretation of the Interpration Act (emphasis added so it doesn't look like gobbly-de-gook) is an accurate one, on the balance of probabilities. I don't think he's saying the IA doesn't apply, (although it looks like that is what w

I'm sorry to hear about your woes, I'm a light sleeper too so feel your pain. I found a website called 'snore store' which sell really good sleep earplugs - much better than the junk they flog in Boots etc. Google them if you fancy taking a look! Best wishes, Seq.

Neither of these points are relevant, nor are they accurate for "real" DYL's. The first thing to establish is whether the drivers in either of these situations were informed of, aware of or otherwise agreed to either their vehicles being clamped or running the risk of them being clamped. If not then issue a letter before the action to both the landowner/tenant and the clamping company and follow up if required with a MCOL claim against both.

1) A liability order is sort of similar to a ccj exept: a)It does not go on your credit record b)You cannot go back to court to challenge it (unless you have lots of money and a good reason at the high court). 2) Had you applied or received small business rates relief ?(the 50% discount for one property under £6000) 3) Has the bill been adjusted to include the 100% relief from October, basically taking 25% the whole annual bill? 4) You need to act FAST. This is a business rates debt so they will turn up WITHOUT WARNING and may well remove your stock on the spot if you can't pay all or maybe half the balance on the spo

I echo Martin's comments re perjury etc, you're asking for advice but in doing so you've laid out a case where you're openly stating you'd lie in court? asking for comments from CAG members is like inviting them be an accessory to your own perjury.

Hi Locutus. Thanks for posting my ix. I have no idea, how to get 20 posts. My count always stays on 0 for some reason...I cannot post links or pictures. Too bad as I really would like to add more photos of my cooking experiences. Today I will try to make marinated chicken cubes and also bake some rolls. Wish me luck. Thaaanks

Just checked info on appealing. You are correct GH a copy of the transcript must be included in the supporting bundle of documents. Cheers for the 'heads up'.

This is floating around on Slyck and Torrentfreak, it's well worth watching. I have no idea who to thank for this so " THANK YOU !!!" Enjoy:rockon: ************************************************ edit by BankFodder 5th October 2010:- Link above removed and replaced HERE I can confirm that this is a hilarious video and big thanks to FloppyDog for noticing it and for telling us all about it.

Good stuff Theo, another case well handled by Lee and the Web Relations Team. Thanks for the update. Regards. Scott.

Just a quick update. Even though mobiles.co.uk were unable to help, Lee was absolutely brilliant and sorted everything out for me. I couldn't be happier! Big thanks to Lee and the Vodafone Web Relations Team. Theo

Hello and Welcome, Amapolalondra. I'm going to start a new thread for you using your first post, I'll send you a Private Message with the 'link', please check your 'Notifications'. I've also unapproved your duplicate post. Regards. Scott.

This is actually relatively common - it is more unusual that a procedure is part of the terms and conditions. If the procedure is part of the terms and conditions it may give rise to a breach of contract claim if the process is not followed to the letter, something which is not always possible for a variety of reasons, many of which may be good reasons. By specifically excluding the procedure from the contract, this means that the employer is not required to follow the process to the letter, but a tribunal would still expect an employer to adhere to the principles and braod process contained therein. An example - many disciplinaries migh

Since 2007 lenders have been more careful with documents,because they were forced to do so. If the OC DID supply you with a copy of your docs,then theres no reason to assume they could not do so again. Of course you are right to say that if the account was assigned,then the assignee should already be in reciept of the supporting docs under CCA. On the other hand,you have said here that you DID recieve a copy and that there is a case filed in Court. Its not so much a moral position to be lying to the Court-this is clearly one of perjury. CAG cannot condone nor be any party in encouraging this.

bank holidays only count on "service", once deemed served it is 14 clear days from then. 88.(2) A date specified under subsection (1) must not be less than fourteen days after the date of service of the default notice, and the creditor or owner shall not take action such as is mentioned in section 87(1) before the date so specified or (if no requirement is made under subsection ( 1)) before those fourteen days have elapsed. it don't mention bank holidays in s88.(2) nor does it mention weekends. its a tough one. cab

It could complicate things as HSBC are involved in both I am sure someone with more know how than me on charging orders will advise. Another point has occured to me which i will PM you about. G