Really ? Irrespective of the number of warrants served ? That is preposterous. You need to revisit fixed and variable costs/overheads (and appropriate tax relief). Say for example, and for ease of numbers, that it costs your business 500,000 gbp p.a to run the back office and bailiffs etc. And you only get 5 warrants to enforce in that financial year. Your stance would put the total claimable fees per warrant at 100,000 gbp (assuming all were satisfied and ignoring the profit element). If you got 500,000 warrants it would put the total claimable fees per warrant at 1 gbp per warrant (assuming all were satisfied and ignoring the

Where I find the problem is making the distinction between the Certificated Bailiff & the HCEO. I don't see a difference between the two & strongly believe the charges applied should be the same, after alll there is little diffrence to knocking on the door and asking for Council Tax/Unpaid PCN & that of Southern Water's Bill. It is the same goods you are attending to seize & remove. The HCEO is in the same position as the Certificated Bailiff when the debtor refuses you entry. There is one firm who make charges akin to telephone numbers yet the attending officer receives nothing like the £750 demanded for a visit, they u

No not every debtor is vulnerable, but remember that allowing charges to spiral many multiples of the original debt as can happen now is also unhelpful. I would suggest that no more than £50 and a maximum of 25 miles at 40 pence per mile for private individuals, is the ballpark. Obviously if it is a corporation and they have funds, then £300 plus mileage, and legitimate true cost of removal vehicle, remember that a Luton 3.5 tonne vehicle is around £75 per day to hire if self drive, plus £8 per hour for a couple of porters, the hourly rate to cover duration and attendance plus two hours for base job and return to base, bear in mind th

Demand the details 1. What bank was the cheque drawn on 2 The Cheque Number 3. The sort code 4 the name of the account holder.

Providing that you were on private land and not council owned - the clue should be that you have a Parking Charge Notice, not a Penalty Charge Notice. If this was official it would have been issued under the authority of an official traffic act. Just also noticed that Park Solve's website still advertises their Registered Office as being Manchester, yet according to Company data they are based in Borehamwood - naughty naughty naughty! " The company has no known group companies. As of their last financial statement, they had £56 in cash reserves. The company's current net worth is £56" What a thriving enterprise! I'd say your ch

It's up to them to to check the trade-in as you are a consumer and not a trader. It's a case of buyer beware and they are the ones that have the experience for that regardless of if you had it checked. They are a trader and despite any excuse they are in a higher position to check the car you gave them before releasing the one you purchased. It's up to them to check it before giving a px price. If you purchased the car with a warranty they still have to honour it dispute or no dispute. I'd have a word with your local Trading Standards. The way their letter is phrased, without being there, it seems as though they are dealing away from pr

Well I Had a result I was correct they had not followed procedure, They have now withdrawn the warrant fee, I just goes to show that you should not just accept the first response if it goes against you. if you have done your research correctly be persistent but polite. 1 complaint upheld 2 being checked out. Leakie

Errrm your pass was "only" a week out of date? So how many time had you travelled on it before you were caught?

The "O" of course stands for "Optional" which means it can never be a "Must Have". That is why we suggest that all OSC is reclaimed because BH will always tell you that you must have it which is not correct.