Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Secure Credit Management/Help Loan.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3809 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just recieved this e-mail from Secure Credit Management, and I'd like anyone's opion on this chapter;

 

I have provided the information below which provides the specifics of where your information came from and how we have confirmed we are speaking to a genuine customer.

London Police Financial Crime Unit - have already reviewed and investigated your case and deemed it is not fraud, they were subject to a protection order through the court to confirm these details.

UK Banks — Were subject to a court order to provide details of matches where they have confirmed the following Name D.O.B match Address match If and when funds entered an account from an MCO Capital product, in your case Balance loan.

Credit Reference Agency — reconfirmed the identity of customer to complete a third and rigorous check to make sure the details confirmed through the other sources were correct in reference to name, address, dob and voters roll information.

In conclusion, we have confirmed from three separate sources, 2 through court order to provide and confirm details of genuine cases where the funds have been confirmed entering the bank account. In this case Secure Credit Management would request that you contact the office further, either via telephone or letter to arrange repayment of the outstanding balance. If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact us.

I have not disputed the debt, I just wanted to know what company they were representing! However, i think they are not telling the truth!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you give us some background on this? It is pretty random.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just give as much background.history as you can. It sounds rather suspicious. Especially since they have claimed they have pursued it through the LPFCU.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, there is nothing more to say, than this e-mail I recieved! Yes, I think the debt is genuine as i do recall the loan, however it was quite a long time ago, but the e-mail just seems to be full of lies!

 

Here is a copy of the letter is full;

 

----- Original Message ----- From: Sridevi Dhulked

To: [email protected]

Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 5:24 PM

Subject: RE: Customer Account No.: XXXXXX

 

 

Dear XXXXXX

Thank you for contacting Secure credit Management.

The letter was in reference to the loan which was taken in 2010 from MCO Capital Ltd, trading as Help loan or Balance loan. The product you had chosen was the Help Loan. The outstanding balance is owed to Secure Credit Management as we have purchased the debt book of MCO Capital and are responsible for collecting the outstanding debt. I have enclosed an information sheet. Confirming the following details:-

• When the loan was taken.

• Into which bank account the funds were credited.

• What date the funds were credited

• Who owned the bank account at the time of credit and now.

• What checks have been completed.

I can confirm that this agreement/contract was not signed for on paper as it was an online application through the website as a click wrap agreement, which states that you have to click and confirm the terms and conditions before you can submit your application and the funds can then be transferred. (I have attached the Help Loan terms and conditions agreed to for your reference),I can confirm we do not have a signed agreement for this loan.

I have provided the information below which provides the specifics of where your information came from and how we have confirmed we are speaking to a genuine customer.

London Police Financial Crime Unit - have already reviewed and investigated your case and deemed it is not fraud, they were subject to a protection order through the court to confirm these details.

UK Banks — Were subject to a court order to provide details of matches where they have confirmed the following Name D.O.B match Address match If and when funds entered an account from an MCO Capital product, in your case Balance loan.

Credit Reference Agency — reconfirmed the identity of customer to complete a third and rigorous check to make sure the details confirmed through the other sources were correct in reference to name, address, dob and voters roll information.

In conclusion, we have confirmed from three separate sources, 2 through court order to provide and confirm details of genuine cases where the funds have been confirmed entering the bank account. In this case Secure Credit Management would request that you contact the office further, either via telephone or letter to arrange repayment of the outstanding balance. If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sridevi Dhulkhed

Data Analyst

Secure Credit Management Limited

Tel: 0121 3487599

[email protected]

www.securecreditmanagement.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can confirm we do not have a signed agreement for this loan.

 

So theyre saying they have bought the debt but cant pursue it through the courts, or they dont have a specifically SIGNED agreement? It's very carefully worded.

 

London Police Financial Crime Unit - have already reviewed and investigated your case and deemed it is not fraud, they were subject to a protection order through the court to confirm these details.

 

Did you get any contact from this unit? Also "protection order to confirm details"?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...