Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

hello old friends


freebird
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well by now my visit will be old news....

 

No excuses just lots of ongoing family illness and events,took priority and when the PC was on it was my son or daughter who were on line, but as CAG is my home page I guess I've never been far away from you xxxxxxx

 

In between the sick beds....I've tried to help friends and even neighbours to reclaim their charges and some have had succsess.

 

My son was on and off thier claim and wanted to do it themselves so I bit my tongue and took a back seat...however, they are with Barclays and up to (LBA) more or less. They were offered £480 over the phone in June but said they wanted to stick out for the £860. Their next step was to fill in the N1 as they sent the LBA..but being so really skint they phoned Barclays to say that they would accept the £480, ( yes I told them to hold out but they both know their own minds) !

The bank said that as they called to accept the £480 after July 1st. the bank will not even consider them until next year as all claims are frozen....

 

Now they're asking for some advice and I said I'd check out on here to see if they should go ahead with the N1.............

 

So my friends,, should they go ahead?

 

I'm waiting to go in for more surgery any day now but if I'm not on line, my daughter can pick up the thread or message for my son.

 

I hope you're all doing well and once again, I'm, so sorry for not keeping in touch but needs must and my evening encounters with the PC are once every blue moon. Please give my love and kind regards to Admin, pinkies and all my old mates and good luck to all current and new posters and claiments.

 

I hope my flight path encouraged a few to claim and stick at it.

 

luv'n stuff

Freebird xx

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Freebird,

 

Your son was offered £480 in June and called after 1st July to accept.

 

Do you have exact dates and was anything concerning this put in writing by bank or son.

 

If he was WRONGLY advised by bank that "because he called after 1st July, he'd not be considered till next year", then he may have grounds to go back to Bank and complain that he accepted an offer in good time and the bank withdrew it prematurely.

 

You could tell bank you'll take the matter to the FOS (if that's the right one - I'll check, and come back)

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consumers who have just been given an offer from the bank/building society

Consumers will have two months to decide whether to accept the bank or building society's offer or to wait for the outcome of the test case. If consumers choose to accept the offer, it is unlikely that they will be able to complain again later regardless of the outcome of the test case. If consumers choose to wait for the outcome of the test case, they will not be able to take up the firm's original offer and the firm will only deal with the complaint once the test case is concluded.

 

taken from:

FSA grants waiver to firms on complaints handling

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Freebird, its nice to see you again, tell your son to fill out his N1 and take it to the court, as he had already refused it, he cant ask for it back :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FB,

 

"....being so really skint they phoned Barclays to say that they would accept the £480,......"

 

Did they actually decline the offer to Barclays by phone or letter, before deciding to accept it?

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...