Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Letter 3 - ignored/no response


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They appear to have told you.......................

 

a little porkie

an untruth

a misleading statement

 

and you don't have to stand for it. They keep records for far longer than that and you have a right to access it- all of it.

 

Issue a Subject Access Request letter for full details of your entire banking history with them. This should include what you are looking for and will include statements so you can calculate your charges.

 

Sorry, but did you leave school before 16. Although you may have signed some form of agreement for your initial account, you could not enter into certain credit agreements, including having a cheque guarantee card until a certain age- (which might be 18 and coincide with what the bank are telling you and the date given by them- someone with more knowledge than me will expand on this.

 

Good luck!!

 

Kennythecelt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chhers but any chance of a real number instead of just random ones?

 

the number doesnt work and now ive wasted 40 mins going to the phone box with a number that doesnt work.

 

its not the first so please please please, make sure that f you leave any info that it is correct and working!!!!!!!!!!

 

thanks.

 

/gets back bangin head on wall.

 

simple really, heres the number from the website, 01625 54 57 45

 

good try though, you was close.

 

i know you guys are trying to help me when im the one lacking in the knowledge but you aint half making it hardwork for me with links that DONT work and wrong numbers.

 

if this is happening to others then no wonder people are a little frantic, fortunately i think i may have sorted it. please please double check info before putting it on a thread. it aint helping if its wrong is it?

 

 

As SSL pointed out, the banks keep changing contact numbers. This is part of their tactics, because as you know, they are not really that keen on parting with our money and returning it to us. Stonedecroze and Tilly have really been doing an excellent job in helping you and in the quality of advice given.

We all learn from each other here. We have a common bond. That bond, which is right across the community within CAG, is a major strength. Remember also that this is a self help group. I am not paid here, neither is SSL, Tilly or Stonedecroze. We have spent a lot of time reading through threads and debating approaches/ tactics and seeing what works and we are more than happy to help you on your way to reclaiming your charges.

Keep focussed and good luck!:D

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again Foo

 

No one here is suggesting that you don't post. Please continue to do so. There is plenty of help here for you. Rest assured, it is always, always, with the best of intentions.

 

Sometimes, when communicating on the web, the wrong message can be sent or received. We need to be mindful of that. There have however, been a couple of issues.

 

Lets move on and get you your claims back. Honestly, this forum has such a wealth of talent, full of nice helpful folk. Its a great community, working in a harsh environment, with, a common bond ie fighting the banks, given what they have done to us.

 

kennythecelt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Foo

 

Keep going towards the court, keep to your timescale.

Discussions are taking place on the general forum and elsewhere on how to handle the issue of stays, if judge agree when asked by banks.

 

The banks now have a duty to keep you informed and updated, part of the waiver conditions.

 

The OFT can still handle non compliance on details missing from your banking history and this should be used in court. The fact is, if they had given you the info, you would have had your money by now. Another possibility is the Information Commissioners Office. See Dusarys thread which has a lot of good info on this.

 

Keep going and good luck!!

 

Kennythecelt

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs Foo.

 

I will have a search and post what I find, but it will be tomorrow though.

 

If you ever need info on a subject, go to the toolbar at the top of this page and use the search icon. Put in the word and away you go. Its not perfect, takes a bit of time, but its pretty good.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they legaly take charges from Benefits?

 

Legally no, as it is the states money but they do. There is a method called appropriation which is something you can use if you are on benefits and they are taking charges off you presently.

I'll also post a link for that tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...