Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking Tickets


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Davies v Heatley [1971] R.T.R 145

Because by s.64(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 traffic signs shall be of the size, colour and type prescribed by regulation, if a sign the contravention of which is an offence contrary to s.36 is not as prescribed by the regulation, no offence is committed if the sign is contravened, even if the sign is clearly recognisable to a reasonable man as a sign of that kind.

 

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

 

Any part of the lines from T-Bar to T-Bar broken or damaged render the lines as non compliant. They must be continuous.

 

So the councils should not issue any tickets if any of their lines or signs (which incidently are one of the same in RT law) are not as prescribed.

  • Confused 1

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Davies v Heatley [1971] R.T.R 145

Because by s.64(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 traffic signs shall be of the size, colour and type prescribed by regulation, if a sign the contravention of which is an offence contrary to s.36 is not as prescribed by the regulation, no offence is committed if the sign is contravened, even if the sign is clearly recognisable to a reasonable man as a sign of that kind.

 

 

The above was for an alleged offence of crossing Double White Lines.

 

 

 

Prescribed Double Yellow Lines must conform. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2002/023113ba.gif There are NO PERMITTED VARIANTS

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
will do thanks for the info. i did check the wording and all seems in order.

 

From what you have previously said you must also have received "Notice to Owner" or even "Charge Certificates". Many councils up and down the country have cocked up with these documents with their automated counting of dates.

 

All documentation other than the initial PCN must refer to the number of days you have from the Date of Service of the notice.

 

Also check on the Notice to Owner the part "If by ??/??/???? you have failed to pay or make representations" The inserted date must allow for them posting the doc to you. If it is exactly 28 days after the Date of Issue of the Notice it is flawed.

 

Take a look at FightBack Forums -> Parking Tickets

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive checked the dates and they are correct. phoned them up regarding the biggest fine. i should have paid 150 by 11/05/06. ontop of that two others totaling 350. This is alot of money for me which makes me feel like just ignoring them. im moving out of my rented accomodation soon, i dont have a uk driving licence and i dont intend to inform the DVLA of my new address untill i have sold my bike and bought a new one. I know its not the best thing to do but i think they have mte by the short and curlies. what do you think my chances are of them giving up looking for me after a while?

 

By just ignoring them you will most likely end up with CCJ registered.

 

Can you scan and post the notices removing all personal identifying text.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the life of me I do not see how the law can allow a private company to fine you. Decrminalisation is one thing but parking schemes operated by private companies are no more legal in my opinion than it would be for you to charge them £60 for returning the letter to them.

 

I agree. There is no legislation in place, the thing they rely on is implied contract, but even this would have to be with the driver and not the registered keeper.

 

If ever I received a letter from a private company I would simply write a short letter disputing any contract and suggest they contact the driver (This makes for good evidence in court if they did try it on) . You are under no obligation whatsoever to provide them with details of the driver.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Ask to see a photo. If you were parked on the pavement, offence or not, then they have the wrong offence on the ticket and it's unenforceable - but as stated above if there is no date of contravention on it (Manchester ticket - are you sure?) then it's irrelevant anyway.

 

Double/Single Yellow Lines are enforceable from the centre of the road up to the building line including any footpaths or grass verges.

 

PCN's with only one date on are U/S

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, well nobody has told NPAS then because I won an appeal some time ago because my car was parked fully on the footpath and not on the road.

 

Has the council allowed footpath parking? If it has thats ok.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not in Blackpool that's for sure! I can't remember exactly where it was to be honest but I don't think you're even allowed to breathe in Blackpool without a permit these days.

 

Thats were I got my last speeding ticket. BTW I didn't pay that either:)

 

We now have Baa Baa Blue Sheep. What are they going to change your resort to.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bartonski,

 

Look back in this thread to posts 6 to 21, you should find the allowable sizes for yellow lines together with tolerances & references for the info given.

 

& dont forget the t bars at each end .....the line/s between the t bars must be unbroken, to the permitted size (with permitted variation/tolerance) and have the correct size t bar at each end.....most of the time it is just the t bars which do not extend far enough towards the pavement at least here on Anglesey.

 

hope it helps you,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-wardens/23765-no-t-bar-end.html#post188533

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

has anyone considered getting this book:

"UK Driving Secrets Guide 2006" ?? (Fight Speeding Ticket, Beat Driving Ticket, Cancel Parking ticket and fight traffic tickets UK driving secrets blue badge)

not plugging it at all ...but wasnt 100% convinced. I guess it would spell out what it would otherwise take a few mins/hours trawling through various websites/forums...but for £28.

 

cheers

 

You will get better advice from this forum and from PePiPoo: Helping the motorist to get justice who give it for free.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I have a parking ticket for parking on a single yellow. On the P.C.N. it states that the vehicle was seen at 16.44 and that the penalty charge is due within 28 days of the date of issue. However, the date of the issue, being the 12/07/2006 and the time of issue, being 16.44, is only printed on the payment receipt. Is the P.C.N. therefore invalid? p.s. many thanks

 

Yes.

 

You can safely quote Bury v McArthur.

 

The payment slip is NOT part of the PCN.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The parking Manager even states that "the information contained on the PCN

is fully compliant with the guidelines on Decriminalised Parking Enforcement outside London which recommends the details which should be recorded on a PCN!!

 

Mr Justice Jackson (A Respected High Court Judge seems to have a different view than the Parking Manager)

 

The Parking Manager is motivated by getting your money even it means telling a few porkies along the way.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...