Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS student account - they said it was closed!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

This is a bit of an odd situation - i was wondering if anyone has any experience of anything similar...

 

I opened an account with Royal Bank of Scotland in 2001. Being a foolhardy student, i cheerfully spent all of the overdraft and never paid anything in! So eventually, in 2004, RBS had had enough and demanded that the overdraft be repaid, and that i returned my debit card (chopped up) and cheque book to them. This is duly did - i paid off the whole debt and sent back the card and cheque book. I then spoke to an RBS representative on the phone and agreed that, as soon as my final payment into the account cleared (so the account would be at £0), my account would be closed. I confirmed that this was definitely what i wanted - i was banking with someone else by this point.

 

BUT...it seems they never closed the account after all. Instead the account began accruing charges. It started because the account i had carried a fee of £6ish a month to maintain. In the first month since i zeroed the balance, therefore, the account went into debit by around £6. This triggered a charge of £33, for using an unauthorised overdraft. This carried on and on and on, every month, from Sep 2004 til now. This all happened without my knowledge because, coincidentally, the very same month that i paid of my RBS debt, I moved house. Of course, I gave RBS no forwarding address because I believed i was no longer a customer of theirs! So any demand letters etc have gone to an address i haven't lived at for years, and the first i heard of this whole mess was when a credit management service tracked me down at my current address, and wrote to me saying i had to pay £450 for RBS charges or i'd be in court.

 

Is there anything i can do about claiming my RBS charges back?! Unfortunately I was naive and, never having closed a bank account before, didnt realise i ought to have got a confirmation letter saying my account had been closed - all i had was that phone conversation. But surely the fact that i never contacted RBS again, gave them no forwarding address, and never used the account in any way again (after all i had no cheque book or debit card) would support my claim that i believed the account to be closed?? And why would i belive that if it was not what i had been told...?

 

So...anyone got any ideas what my rights might be? :???:

 

Thanks...(and sorry for writing an essay!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, just by calling their customer services number... Was told that as far as they're concerned the charges are legitimate (especially as I do not have written proof of the agreement to close the account) but that if i still want to query the charges I should write to them. Which i am about to do, but discovered this forum and thought i'd see if anyone had heard of this before...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you write to the customer complaints department setting out in full the whole circumstances. State that RBS should have a note on their archive systems of the telephone call you made on or around x date. State that it is obvious that you considered the account closed since you ceased to use the account and returned the items requested.

 

Request that they close your account removing all chares that should not have been applied, and remove any notes they have made to credit reference agencies. There's help elsewhere on the site on this (I've no eperience of it personally). Give them 14 days to respond positively to you. Then an LBA if they don't with a further 14 days.

 

In the meantime, check your credit rating and look for what it is needs to be removed. Ensure you get this done, through the court if necessary.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...