Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Going back over 6 yrs, no info?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I wrote to the RBS asking for my statements going back past 6 years as they only initially provided the last 6 years.

I have had a letter back from RBS telling me that they hold no statements on my account going back 6 years. They say they don't have to keep them so they haven't.

This is an old account closed in 2003.

 

I'm not 100% convinced they are being honest, afterall its the RBS. Do you believe them? Is there anything else I can do?

 

Is it worth starting court action or am I just going to have to take them at their word that the statements are gone.

Thanks

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't believe them in the slightest they are telling lies ....I've got statements out of them going back to 19 Dec 1997 and I'm going to force them to produce them going back futher.Take a look at this letter that came with my statements.

Proof they are telling you lies

sparkie

Your Ref:

OurRef: RBS / 28694065 / Arch / CCT / JMK

Date: 18th June 2007

RBS

The Royal Bank of Scotland Croup

Credit Management Services Customer Care Team

Kendal Court Ironmasters Way Telford TF3 4DT

Direct Dial Number: 01952 - 206432

Facsimile Number: 01952-206531

Textphone: 01952-206570

 

I write further to our recent telephone conversations regarding the corresponding entries to the debits to your personal account numbered XXXXXXXX.

As discussed, I have been able to obtain copy statements for the business account numbered XXXXXXXXcovering the period from the start of 1998 through to mid-May 1998. I would draw your attention to the credits recorded on 31st March and 7th May 1998 - both for - which correspond to the withdrawals -from your personal account.

I am still trying to obtain further statements but, as you are aware from our conversations, there is an element of trial and error in the process of obtaining these as I cannot be certain of the precise date that the account was closed.

However, there does appear to be activity on the account beyond the date that we originally understood that the account had been closed and replaced with your personal account. This includes entries such as cheques and credits that could only have been instigated by you.

I will continue to try to obtain further statements and these will be forwarded to you if and when I receive them.

Yours sincerely

J.M.Kennedy

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland pic is registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

The Royal Bank of Scotland pic is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and represents The Royal Bank of Scotland Marketing Group. The Bank sells life polic units in collective investment schemes and pension products and advises only on the Marketing Group's range of these products and on a With Profit Bond produced by Norwich Unic Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Sparkie

 

That's all well and good, and I'm already convinced they are talking crap about not having any statements older than 6 years, but how do I proceed? Is there some sort of proof they should have that the statements were destroyed? Can I force them to produce this? Are they legaly obliged to keep statements for a fixed period of time?

 

Sorry about all the questions, but I really want to stick it to 'em good!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there is only a stipulation that they must keep for at least six years....but if anyone holds information for a period longer than six years the Data Protection Act states they must have a reason for doing so and ithey must give you a reason for keeping it also if they do, they must supply you with it because it is your information and you are entitled to it, that is why Banks allways say that they hold information for no longer than six years, so if they do and do keep it longer they are making negligent miss statements with the deliberate attempt to deceive and mislead.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just write and tell them to supply them ......as you can provide absolute proof ( from th RBOS themselves) that they DO keep statements longer than six years, and have provided them to other customers so why are they discriminating against you..... andif necessary prove it in court but the evidence will not be shown to them until the day of a court hearing as it is priviledge information, and does not belong to you...... but at a push you could use my evidence to the fact.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be sounding daft here but just because they have some peoples statements surely doesn't mean they have to have mine, especially since the account was closed a few years ago.

 

Debs (the wife)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should they keep some peoples statements and not others one of my accounts was supposed to have been closd in 1998, I got statements on that account, so again why keep some and not others

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...