Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Royal Bank Of Scotland Charges


Soad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6376 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Local branch is fine

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter yesterday from RBOS after sending the Data Protection Act Subject Access Request on Monday which was signed for on Tuesday

 

Its pretty standard saying we apologise for your dissatisfaction but we believe our charges are fair, reasonable and transparent, but as gesture of goodwill they we refund £371.00 if I sign the letter as full and final settlement of all claims relating to charges!!!

 

I don’t think so, should I answer the letter saying no thanks or just ignore it, or will they forget to send my statements if I did not acknowledge this letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Hi Soad

 

Why not tell them that you'll accept the offer but not as a full and final settlement? inform them that you'll accept it as a part settlement and that you will be persuing the rest of the money through the courts if they do not settle the full amount with you.

 

Good luck

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

If we have gone overdrawn (our fault – not the bank’s) and the bank charges an interest payment to our account do we just have to accept the charge or can we still claim that the amount of the charge is extortionate and say, claim half or something of it back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only claim back overdraft interest IF unfair charges have placed you in overdraft. For example, if for one month you are £500 overdrawn but as yet have not had any charges to the account then the interest they charge you isn't re-claimable BUT if the £500 consists of charges then you can claim a percentage of the interest charged back.

 

To be honest, what I did was start to claim back the interest that they had charged when the overdraft reached a certain point and amounted to the charges total. So, overdraft = £300 and charges = £300. The account sort of ran in parallel after that so it wasn't too much to work out.

 

It's up to you though......bloomin'eck I hope that made sense :>(

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just received a letter yesterday saying that they feel the "charges are fair, reasonable and transparent, they consider that the amounts debited to my account have been applied strictly in accordance with my agreement with them and are satisfied they comply with applicable laws and regulations". (Standard letter eh?)

 

 

Against background, we must differ with the views expressed in your letter.

 

However we have taken the opportunity to review the charges applied to your account and as an exceptional matter we are prepared to refund £1112.00 as a gesture of goodwill

 

Acceptance of this will be in full and final settlement of all claims and they want me to sign the letter as well

 

Shall I just ignore this letter or acknowledge it and say I will be going to the next stage with a letter demanding full settlement before action

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...