Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

F/Direct C/Cards-Directions all at SEA?


icepop55
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all F/D assailants,

 

A brief retrospective look.

 

* Sept 2006. Entered through the CCCA a (DMP) to pay.

* Sept 2006. F/Direct formally withdrew all banking facilities. No problem with this as I only had a C/Card with them by now. I did successfully reclaim all my bank-charges prior to the withdrawal. The usual occurred, and settled out of court.

* Oct 2006. F/Direct will not accept agreement from CCCA of repayment offer.

* Jan 2007. Intrum Justitia (DCA) acquire my debt. I still maintain that repayment through the CCCA (DMP) is adhere too.

* Apr 2007. CCA'd Intrum & F/Direct.

* Apr 2007. MCO F/Direct for C/Card late payment fees.

* Apr 2007. F/D confirm no refund under FTO guidelines.

* Apr 2007. Notice that Acknowledgment of service has been filed.

* May 2007. Transfer to local court order. With the filing of an AQ be dipendsed with.

* May 2007. Intrum Justitia send back £1.00 fee and hand back to F/Direct my debt account. No further dealings. (out of the picture).

* Jun 2007. Reported F/Direct to OFT for seriously defaulting the CCA request.

* Jun 2007. Stopped payments to F/Direct

* Jun 2007. Notice of Allocation (preliminary hearing) set for 2/8/07 because the Judge is requesting a special direction are needed in this claim to prepare for the final hearing which the judge would prefer to explain to me in person? Needless to say I have sent my own Order for Directions to the judge and DG Solicitors.Its called FULL DISCLOSURE.

 

So folks, thats my argument to date. I see little substance and plenty substantive deliberate acts.

 

Please if you wish to add further to this with either advice or anything constructive please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Update!!!!

 

F/Direct has passed my debt to another DCA namely 'Metropolitan collection services Ltd'

 

Today I sent and requested a CCA telling them that I don't acknowledge any debt to your company or its associates.

First Direct are already in breach prior to this notice.

When will penney drop?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

F/Direct has settled.

 

DG acting on their instructions has issued a total settlement offer. So goes other Court date unanswered.

 

HSBC will not go to COURT knowingly having a full DISCLOSER to answer for.

 

Good luck to the rest and dont lose heart!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...