Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fluffycloud vs Studio/Express Gifts PPI Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Another claim underway with Studio/Express Gifts, sent a SAR got my statements, claimed my admin charges and they rolled over straight away and I got them refunded immediately (well within 2 weeks). Trying to claim back my mis sold PPI on the account as I was self employed and a housewife at the time of account inception. Sent template letter and I received a reply basically saying:

Its an optional cover for all customers, offered at the point of ordering by telephone or online, no written confirmation is required to opt into the policy. At the inception date of the PPI, a welcome letter was despatched to the account address (which I never received) detailing the full T&Cs, premiums have been charged at 1.95% of the o/s balance per mth. We are unable to refund premium charges to your account.

 

Is there anything I can do? Is this standard stuff?

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"no written confirmation is required to opt into the policy"

Are these Jokers having a laugh,You need to get them to proviude you with a true copy of the credit agreement, PPI is classed as a seperate contract with most companies, They seem to think that they can simply add it to your account without your permission..I dont think so..

 

When you submitted you SAR you should have recieved copies of all information relating to your account, not just copy statements, The onus is on them to provide clear evidence that you did in fact opt into the PPI, but thats just my opinion..

 

Good Luck

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in the process of trying to get my ppi payments back fromt hem aswell - they have sent me a copy of the terms and conditions (no signature anywhere) - it says that "express gifts ltd have arranged this cover with Bankers Insurance Company Ltd and bankers life assurance company ltd. both member companies of Assurant Solutions. If you have any questions .please write to us at: 117 - 119 Whitby Road, Slough, Berkshire SL1 3DR."

So If you are offered it in a telephone conversation then surely by law the person selling this policy has to go through it with you to see if you are eligible? according to the t&c they seem to leave it up to you:

..................................

"A Introduction: This document tells you about the benefits ,conditions and exclusions of your payment protection plus cover.Please read this document carefully to make sure you are eligible for cover and that you know what the policy does and does not cover."

...................................

So which is it - does the person by law have to go through the policy with you in an effort to make sure it is sold correctly over the telephone? or do they just ask you on the phone if you want it ( no way of disputing that either) and then send you all this gobbldy gook reading for you to desipher yourself and make sure that you are eligible?:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in the process of trying to get my ppi payments back fromt hem aswell - they have sent me a copy of the terms and conditions (no signature anywhere) - it says that "express gifts ltd have arranged this cover with Bankers Insurance Company Ltd and bankers life assurance company ltd. both member companies of Assurant Solutions. If you have any questions .please write to us at: 117 - 119 Whitby Road, Slough, Berkshire SL1 3DR."

So If you are offered it in a telephone conversation then surely by law the person selling this policy has to go through it with you to see if you are eligible? according to the t&c they seem to leave it up to you:

..................................

"A Introduction: This document tells you about the benefits ,conditions and exclusions of your payment protection plus cover.Please read this document carefully to make sure you are eligible for cover and that you know what the policy does and does not cover."

...................................

So which is it - does the person by law have to go through the policy with you in an effort to make sure it is sold correctly over the telephone? or do they just ask you on the phone if you want it ( no way of disputing that either) and then send you all this gobbldy gook reading for you to desipher yourself and make sure that you are eligible?:?

 

The point I feel is that they are not remotely interested as to whether it is eligble for you. They only want your money, Once you have, it by fair or fowl means, they can then find some exclusion not to pay up, so the customer loses on both counts. a double whammy for you and lots of dosh for them. It makes my blood:x boil.

 

I certainly would give them a run for return of your money:D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...