Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for taking your time and helping me on this. Would you recommend I also send a letter tomorrow to both BMW and Motonovo?
    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC - Court on 2.8.07


m.neville610
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Have had a court date of the 2.8.07 and the letter states that paperwork has to be exchanged by all parties 2 weeks before the court date. I have been reading up on all the paperwork that i need to prepare but was wondering if it would be better if i get it in order now and send it or would it be better if i send it at the last minute.

 

What would anyone advise? If i send it now would i get an offer sooner than i would if i leave it. Not desperate for the money but would like to get this over and done with.:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a bout 600 pages in total (3 lots of 200) so i would suggest to keep reading up and wait till nearer the time hsbc may offer in full before the court date so send them a new nudge letter telling of the impending court date if you need a link to these type of letters they are located in this thread

 

just edit the letter to your needs and include a schedule of charges and send via recorded delivery. i would suggest posting your letter on here so we can take a look at it and suggest any changes to it before you post out.

 

hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info. It really helped. Have read through it and the different letter. I have already sent a 'gee up' letter to DG and also another after i had the letter from the court telling me they were doing away with the AQ. What letter do i send now though? I can't find one thats within the lines of that we have a court date and i think we should settle before that date. Can you help? Also i was reading that even though the AQ is not required i would be required to pay the fee but i have not been asked for any monies for this. Should i have been?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a copy of mine which includes about my hearing:-

 

DG Solicitors

12 Calthorpe Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1QZ

(date)

Re: xxxxxxxxxx- v - HSBC

account no: xxxxxxxxxxxx

claim no: xxxxxxxxxxxx, Filing date:xx.xx.2007.

As you have not replied to my letters dated xx.xx.xx and xx.xx.xx, I thought that I might take the opportunity to write to you again, in the hope that you will respond to this matter.

I am aware that you have a vast number of claims with which you are currently dealing with, and in order to resolve this matter more quickly, I am still willing to accept the sum of £xxxx.xx in full and final settlement. Please note that I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

Also, as I am sure you are aware, we have a preliminary hearing on xx.xx.xx at xx:xxam at xxxxxxxxxx County Court, of which I am looking forward too, but in order to expeditethis claim, I hope we can come to a reasonable conclusion.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention.

 

I have again enclosed a copy of the schedule of charges. This schedule also shows the total of my claim to date, being the original claim amount (£xxxx.xx), the daily interest total to date (£xx.xx) and the court fee (£xxx.xx).

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

With kind regards,

Yours sincerely,

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think FL means the AQ fee. If your AQ has been dispensed with, some courts still want the fee to be paid, so give them a ring and ask.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyones advise. I will give the court a ring tomorrow. And get to work on the letter to DG. Another thing i would like to discuss is; i have a loan with HSBC but no current acount any longer with them. The loan is now in the hands DG as i defaulted on the payments over a year ago but i do pay them a weekly amount now. Will they take the money they have to pay me back (4K) and pay it to my loan (i don't want them to do this). I have heard that some banks , if you have a loan account and a current accoung with them, pay your money back into your current account and then automatically take it out and pay it to the loan account you have with them. Is this true and are they within their rights to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe they can but if you ask for the amount in a cheque they may be oblidged to give it you there is a thread on here somewhere with this explained in detail but i cant find it - maybe someone else knows where it is and will post a link for you.:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi neville,

 

Is it a full hearing oyu have or is it a pre lim hearing? as it migh be worth considering asking the court ( judge) for a draft directions order...... all the information on this is on the site.........

 

this could speed the whole thing up.........:)

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello neville,

 

how long did it take to get your court date after being told your case weas being transferred to your local court?

 

mines been a couple of weeks now with no news.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...