Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help with NCO Europe


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What puzzles me is given how many people have problems with this company and others and given how many years they have been operating, why are they still active? Surely they should be getting shut down before long? Also, if the so called "respectable" companies such as Barclaycard or the Student Loans company knowingly work with these scumbags don't they also share some liability (AofD act 1970) for any harassment or other unsavoury behaviour? Is it that hard for so many affected consumers to prove they are being unfairly treated?

 

M.S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My suggestion would be for everone who has to deal with NCO to complain to the FOS and the FSA on mass. When I spoke to my local TS about NCO they were useless and said that they would inform Preston TS of the problems with NCO so it may well be worth EVERYONE getting a letter off to all three organisations and detail the problems with NCO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

As I suspected, I received the signed executed credit agreements from NCO. I did not however get a full statement of account or a deed of assignment. It showed that NCO are working together with the original creditor. I telephoned the original creditor to try and get them to cut out the middle man and the guy I spoke to just refused. I said that they should take part responsibility for the methods their agents use and he said they operate without their knowledge and they take no responsibility. I asked why they refuse to remove NCO from the process given I've paid regularly and don't dispute the debt and he said "why should we, you should have paid up at the start". They're basically allowing it as some sort of "revenge". Utter, utter bastards.

 

I got a postcard from NCO this morning telling me someone called P Edwards is going to turn up on Tuesday between 9am and 9pm. Is this real and if not does it count as evidence of threatening behaviour? What do they hope to achieve from this? I've always paid regularly what I can afford and without missing any payments. They can't make me pay what I don't have!

 

Anyway, given I STILL don't know my balance or how much there is left to pay, have they really satisfied the CCA? I spoke to my local TS anyway who were really helpful and I'm keeping logs from now on. I'm a bit annoyed because I'm supposed to send them copies of the letters I've written but I accidentally deleted one of them.

 

Thanks

M.S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ManSpot, is this "agreement" the real thing or simply an application form as these DON'T count (on the whole).

 

Don't worry about the "calling card" I have amassed a nice load, just waiting for Saturday and Sunday and I'll have the full set ;)

 

They are typical NCO scare tactics and to be ignored.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Curlyben

 

No, these are the original credit agreements. I still don't have a balance sheet though. I'm taking Monty's advice and writing to the Student Loans Company requesting the monthly statements.

 

However, since they did not provide these as part of the CCA, have they really satisfied the request?

 

Also, is it an offence to add interest without the knowledge of the consumer?

 

M.S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi people

 

I have not had a peep out of NCO for nearly two weeks. I wrote them a letter telling them that visits were a waste of time and that harassment techniques were illegal. In the meantime their clients (my original creditors) have confirmed that the debt will remain with NCO until it is paid off. I also instructed my phone service provider to block calls from marketing companies (does this include 0870 numbers does anyone know?)

 

Does anyone have any experience with this? Does the lack of harassment mean they have backed off or is it the calm before the storm so to speak? Also, can anyone confirm that OFT regulations place equal blame for DCA's behaviour on the creditors that use them?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice!

M.S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...