Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Do defaults always mean you won't get credit?


Ferru
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a default that is about 3 years old. The amount of the default was £120. If I pay off the outstanding amount due, how much of an impediment will the default be to me in getting credit?

 

Thanks

 

Regards

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The default will show as settled on your cra record but will remain on there untill the 6th anniversary of it being put on there. This will affect your rating until then.

My husband is a discharged bankcrupt with 2 defaults showing and despite having an excellent banking record with Nat West for the last five years they still refused to upgrade his account last week.

Hope this helps

Midge61

Link to post
Share on other sites

ferru,

It depends who you go to for credit, what it is for ie card/mortgage etc and how much you are looking for. They all have different 'point' systems.

 

I know defaults are being put on par with CCJ's now, but the ease that creditors now apply a default to your credit file, I reckon the system will eventually be a waste of time.

 

As the default stays for 6 years, I'd save your money, and put it towards what ever it was you wanted the credit for:D

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps think you have started a thread in the wrong place:eek:

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments guys.

 

You may be right about me putting this thread in the wrong place. I started this thread here because I was hoping that someone who worked for a bank might say 'Well, actually the bank I work for, Bank X, is often willing to lend to people with defaults providing they have been paid off and are not recent'.

 

Does anyone know of any lenders (apart from companies whose APR for people with defaults is extortionate), that are willing to lend to people with defaults?

 

Jeff

 

ps think you have started a thread in the wrong place:eek:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments guys.

 

Does anyone know of any lenders (apart from companies whose APR for people with defaults is extortionate), that are willing to lend to people with defaults?

 

Jeff

The response is deafening:rolleyes:

 

Once again they have us by the short n curlies:mad:

 

I have noticed the bank workers on the MSE site are a bit more vocal8-)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
The response is deafening:rolleyes:

 

Once again they have us by the short n curlies:mad:

 

I have noticed the bank workers on the MSE site are a bit more vocal8-)

 

I think that one reason there's no response is because there isn't a simple answer. For example, what does he need to borrow? How much? For what reason?

 

The overriding reason would be that there isn't a simple answer. All lenders operate their own system of credit scoring (and some of them are pretty crap). However, in general, they will take into account CCJs (usually a CCJ will block any lending) and defaults. However, the credit reference agencies supply different levels of information to different clients. The lender may just see a default. Or he may see how much the default was for. And when it was paid off. These various things may be factored into the credit score.

 

Unfortunately, you cannot find out how a particular institution credit scores. They are under no obligation to tell you. Which is a total bummer.

 

What you can do is put onto your credit records a 'Notice of Correction'. Basically this is a short piece of text that you add against a default explaining why it's there. Lenders must read these and take them into account when making a lending decision. That's a matter of law. Doesn't mean they'll lend - but it does mean that if your circumstances were different e.g. you were hospitalized at the time and couldn't work - they may look at your case in a different light.

PhiltheBear

 

Lloyds TSB - At the Sign of Flogging a Dead Horse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Philthebear,

" However, the credit reference agencies supply different levels of information to different clients." is that down to how much the client is prepared to pay for the info?

Or how much info they need to then look at if they can be bothered with you?

Crap comes to my mind as well, creditors seem to have picked up on these reports to use as another threat/bargining tool.

Just another piece of crap to try and wade through in your life:-x

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can get credit if you have CCJ's defaults and bankruptcy's

 

you may have to pay an arrangement fee though.

 

you do not always have to pay a higher amount of interest either.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Philthebear,

" However, the credit reference agencies supply different levels of information to different clients." is that down to how much the client is prepared to pay for the info?

Or how much info they need to then look at if they can be bothered with you?...

 

Bizarrely enough - neither! If you have a business that offers credit you can enter into a relationship with a credit reference agency at one of two levels. The lower level means that you simply have the right of enquiry and the amount of information you get is (not very) limited.

 

The higher level means that you supply information back to the agency as well as receiving it. If you do this you can, depending on the agency, get monetary information about whole loads of transactions. For example, if you owe money on a loan the loan company can supply your monthly balance, whether or not you paid on time, how much you paid, etc.

 

And now - BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID - the banks, with at least the connivance of one agency, will be circulating, initially amongst themselves, details of your monthly account deposits. The rationale behind this is that by examination of a monthly deposit a lender can extrapolate your annual earnings (after deductions) and thus make a 'better' judgment of the risk you pose as a borrower.

 

You should also be aware that the clearing banks have accounts with ALL credit reference agencies. Other lenders usually only use one. Therefore, it is possible that a default with one company may not show on all agencies' records. If you approach a lender who doesn't use the agency where it does show you may be considered perfectly OK.

PhiltheBear

 

Lloyds TSB - At the Sign of Flogging a Dead Horse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Philthebear, just compounding my thoughts on how credit reports have developed, and yes I am afraid, where's data protection when you need it:(

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your account is defaulted but not settled, will it still be wiped from your credit report in 6 years, or does it have to be settled for it to be removed?

 

I only say that as I have an account that was defaulted in 2004 with 2k still owing, I havent been chased at all for this money since, but my credit report still shows it as defaulted but not settled...

 

Im hoping they dont contact me and it will just dissapear from my report in 2010, I mean 3 years of no contact regarding this account is a tad strange even though I still owe 2k...

 

Can anyone explain what has happened there?

 

has it been written off internally, but not removed from my report?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SmiffySUFC, how can we explain what has happened? If you have no contact after 6 years it is statue barred, end of.:)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SmiffySUFC, how can we explain what has happened? If you have no contact after 6 years it is statue barred, end of.:)

 

Thanks for the reply..

 

Statue barred, what exactly does that mean?

 

So it will be removed from my credit report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 6 years, you can no longer be chased for a debt, I don't know if its physically removed from your credit file, perhaps someone who knows will answer:) , I would be interested to know, as I have a ccj from 2002, will it stay there for all to see? coz with defaults for late payments etc being put on the report, mine's going to be reems long;)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Philthe Bear, could this also be used by dca's?

 

And now - BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID - the banks, with at least the connivance of one agency, will be circulating, initially amongst themselves, details of your monthly account deposits. The rationale behind this is that by examination of a monthly deposit a lender can extrapolate your annual earnings (after deductions) and thus make a 'better' judgment of the risk you pose as a borrower.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 6 years, you can no longer be chased for a debt, I don't know if its physically removed from your credit file, perhaps someone who knows will answer:) , I would be interested to know, as I have a ccj from 2002, will it stay there for all to see? coz with defaults for late payments etc being put on the report, mine's going to be reems long;)

 

You don't have a 'credit file' as such. There are 3 credit reporting agencies who gather information about you. One source of data is CCJs. If you don't "satisfy" the CCJ by paying it, it stays on your record for 6 years, after which it should disappear. However, the credit agencies may take a month or two before this happens (and, no, you have no redress if they are slow).

 

You CAN be chased for a debt after 6 years. However, it's very rare and usually only if the debt was big enough to be pursued in a High Court rather than a County Court. (Been there, done that!)

 

Defaults also stay for 6 years. So, you have to wait 6 years from your latest default before it goes.

 

The thing about banks circulating your earnings. This is currently only inter-bank. Will that change? Don't know. But I think that if it does it'll be a few years away. The problem is that when you sign up for anything finance related there's always a clause about them sharing financial information - and there is no limit as to what that information is.

  • Haha 1

PhiltheBear

 

Lloyds TSB - At the Sign of Flogging a Dead Horse

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
You CAN be chased for a debt after 6 years. However, it's very rare and usually only if the debt was big enough to be pursued in a High Court rather than a County Court.
Not if it's covered by S5 Limitation Act 1980. Doesn't matter how large the debt is.Do you have any case law or statutes to clarify?

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if it's covered by S5 Limitation Act 1980. Doesn't matter how large the debt is.Do you have any case law or statutes to clarify?

 

For a 'normal' contract there is a 6 year limitation. For a 'specialty' (for example a deed) the limitation is 12 years. The textbook example is Bristol and West making a claim on a person whose house was repossessed and yet there was still a shortfall in the amount recovered by selling the house against the amount owed. They sued - they won. However, there is a possibility that this may be appealed (but the Act is quite clear on this point and appealing it would seem to be a waste of money).

 

Also, if there was no fixed period for the repayment of a loan the six years starts from the point at which the lender made a demand for his money back - not from the time of the loan. So, if you have a bank overdraft which started, say, in 2002 and the bank calls it in now then the six year limitation starts now - not from 2002.

 

There is another possibility which may complicate matters. It may be the case that if you were sued by person A and the court gave a judgment against you and you didn't pay and interest accrued that person A could sell that debt to person B. If person B then sues he may be able to start the six year clock again. The Act seems to provide for this to happen because the overall debt would now be a different debt with a third party. I think it's very unlikely that this would happen but a quick reading of the Act would seem to allow it. (But I'm not a lawyer - thank the Lord ;)).

PhiltheBear

 

Lloyds TSB - At the Sign of Flogging a Dead Horse

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...