Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dunno you've not scanned up what you've had before how can we tell?  
    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can a DCA pursue someone who moves abroad


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Progress is slow but sure! I have received the CCA from the French DCA to gether with the Terms and Conditions that relate to the Natwest Credit card. An earlier post by someone suggested this was acceptable

 

BUT Clause 10 (b) of the Terms and Conditions states " If your address is in Scotland , Scottish Law shall apply to this agreement. If you live elsewhere English Law applies to this agreement"

 

Now, I live in France so me thinks that English Law applies. Would this not negate any attempt by the French DCA to pursue me for the alleged debt in a French Court?

 

The alleged debt appears to have been properly assigned to Arrow Global but I cannot see any justification for this assignment to cancel the condition of English Law in favour of French Law for a firm of DCAs they appoint in France

 

So if there is anyone here who can shed more light I would be grateful. If I am correct it may be that debts incurred in the UK under English Law cannot have the Court of Jurisdiction changed to a foreign country unless this is specifically provided for in the CCA agreement and associated Terms and Conditions.

 

To add more confusion, as papers cannot be served on someone outside the UK for a UK matter, would all legal attempts to collect money from folk who have moved abroad be a waste of time.

 

I await the brains on CGA to help me. Thanks

 

(below is the link to the original thread)

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/69776-natwest-arrow-global.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stuffed!!

 

Just to recap on my opinion:-

 

To chase in France or elsewhere in EU they need an EEO (European Enforcement Order).

 

To get an EEO they must have an existing uncontested judgment made by a court in the member state from whence the claim originated.

 

If you are no longer resident in the UK, then they can not obtain a judgment in UK. They can not obtain a judgment from a French court, because the contract is governed by UK law. A bit of a stalemate situation.

 

They can do the usual DCA tricks, but the risk of any court action is very small, if not impossible.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Danny

 

A star as usual !

 

You enforce my understanding which seems to make the collection of debts from folk incurring them in the UK then moving abroad virtually impossible.

 

Maybe I should ask what they paid for my debt and agree a settlement (sorry joking!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I should ask what they paid for my debt and agree a settlement (sorry joking!)

 

 

Well the decision is entirely yours, but that sounds like a good idea to me!!

 

Ask them for a copy of the original UK judgment. Say you were not aware a judgment existed and had you been aware of court action on this account, you would have contested it because... (use your imagination a bit here - charges, perhaps??). Ask them for the reference of the EEO because you want to contact the issuing court to ask for... (leave to appeal, perhaps)??

 

Makes it clear to them you know what you are on about, and you know that no such document exists (we hope!!). I think it's called Brinkmanship. The bargaining chips are well and truly in your favour - "We could settle this now if you'll accept xxx, and give me something in writing to prove the debt is satisfied.....etc"

 

Everyone's a winner, and your conscience is clear.

 

 

Don't take my word as gospel, that's just an opinion, but the theory is sound. It's your call now.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

As we suspected, it seems the new EEO is just as it says :-

 

The Law Society

 

..an instrument to enforce an existing CCJ in an EU member state.

 

 

I've not read all the small print of the EEO, but it does very little to change things if a CCJ does not already exist in the country of origin. I began to wonder if it might now be possible to get a UK judgment using your address in France, but it seems very unlikely especially if the claim is defended. The fact UK is outside the 'eurozone' works in your favour. ;-)

 

There's a surprisingly large amount of info on this subject on the net, I guess people are moving around far more in recent years than ever before, and so things had to change eventually.

 

Bon Chance.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Danny

I think I read somewhere that a claim cannot be made in a UK Court if the creditor has been abroad for more than 3 years. This also applies I believe to being made bankrupt. Your link does refer to a possible judgment being enetered if the creditor does not attend the hearing, but I suspect they need to show I was aware of any impending hearing, which I am certainly not aware of. Natwest did originally tell me no Court claim had been filed so it just remains to find out if a UK Comapny can raise a claim in another country for an agreement that was clearly executed under English Law.

 

Think I will fire another shot across the bows of the French DCA and see how they respond.

 

A bientot

Link to post
Share on other sites

..... so it just remains to find out if a UK Comapny can raise a claim in another country for an agreement that was clearly executed under English Law.

 

Here's the start of yet another trail for you to study....

 

SCADPlus: European enforcement order for uncontested claims

 

 

On another thread, a poster who's name escapes me made a reference to a company called Transcom part of Arrow and the "Sallie Mae" group (USA again...). Transcom claim that using EEO they can obtain a judgment anywhere, and pursue you anywhere. If you read up the relevant sections in the EEO regulations agreed by member states, you'll find that EEO can apply only to uncontested claims, and where judgment already exists in the member state where the claim arose. I imagine this will prevent a defendant using the law of one country to try and overrule another. Not in the spirit of a United Europe.

 

I sometimes wonder if these US dominated companies deliberately misinterpret the law, or just put this carp out to confuse people. Or perhaps they think because they have US backing they can just ignore EU laws????......Strange lot.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I remember that thread too.

 

I am going to contact the French DCA and ask for a copy of the original judgement and the EEO (which from your link seems quite complicated to get).

 

Then, as I have never been advised of any court hearing, and the fact I dispite the amount, see if I can get this all into perspective

Link to post
Share on other sites

i stuffedby natwest i was in the same situation with u but the other way around i lived in france and move to the Uk , owning quite a bit of money to a french bank overdraft which i wasn't aware of it until my card was cancelled. however, yhe debt is unenforceABLE HAS WE ARE NOT GOVERNED BY uK LAW BUT BY THE FRENCHH ONE, so don't worry too much about it . however having said that if u owed quite a large sum of money, then iu will be better to seek some legal advice as rthey can pursue u although very expensive to them . if i was u ignore them and stuffed them !!!!! lol seven years ago i received a phone called wanted an adress to put me on bankrupcy, which i didn't and i haven't terceived anything as i didn't have a french adress and by so wasn't governed by the french law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phill123,

 

I think you have just underlined the point that now is the best time in our recent history to spread your wings and take the risk.

 

It's a business paradise.

 

The EU laws are very carefully constructed in such a way it is impossible to blame Poles/Romanians coming to UK for employment, when Brits are baling out in their thousands.

 

The only excitement is waiting to see which way the UK will jump...US or EU ???

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly, the pursue a debt while living in an other country can be quite difficult and expensive as it has legal complexity miny debt in france was only for 400 pounds which is not much but they will try to pursue of owed over 700 pounds and again for a business it is not worth while to pursue this kind of claim . the Uk will oalways be stuck between two influences the Eu and US look culturally wise and european businesses implemented in Uk .... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Onwards and upwards!

 

Below is part of the e mail from Optima Legal in the UK. Me wonders if he has any knowledge of the process of issuing claims in the UK, for contracts governed by English law against non residents living in France

 

It would be most unkind to rub his nose in it, in particular using specific references that danny and others have given on here!

 

Mr xxxx

In the absence of any settlement proposals from you, proceedings are presently being issued out of the xxxx County Court.

These proceedings will be served upon you directly.

 

The address we have for you in France is XXXXX, France. If this is not correct then please let me know.

I note that you will be defending my client's claim.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Carless,

 

Scares the hell out of me when i see things like that, but if no CCJ exists then an EEO is out of the question.

 

Do they really think they can get a CCJ at a French address through a UK court?? Looks like the classic scare tactics to me, trying to force you into contact.

 

Let us know if anything develops, and good luck.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. I think I understood that the defendant in any county court claim could elect to have the case heard in his/her immediate area, i.e next to where they live. So I suppose I could ask the court to have the case heard in my local court in France?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no thatr tis worng as the LAW THAT YOU ARE GOVERNED IS DIFFERENT THEY CANNNOT Apply english law to a french court, as foirst the civil procedure are differnt and sewcondly the when u soigned the agreemement is was under the CCA 1974 which is not APPLICABLE TO FRENCH LAW DUE TO DIFFERENT CIVIL PART PROCEDURE. they are just trying to intimidate tyou believe i had the same ****. sorry for the word but they cannort sue unless you have a warrant for aRREST MAINLY FOR FRAUD. i know fore this by experience, this totallly illegal as one lwa does not necessary equal to an other one. law and custon differs greatly from france and england as long u don'[t have any legal tie in englkand( e.g. : such an adress) you shoulkd be ok as they canno tpursue u unless they rpove the debt was made in france not in uk . i hope this help. a ccva request is irrelevant unless you have an adrees in UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

carless u cannot have you defence heard in france due to different law and custom this is illegal , unpractical. european law is quiter clear on this one national law canot be applicable onto an other state., unless it was made in the french counry and governewd by the french law. if not suffed them. theyare on a loosinfg batrttle ground trying to scare u !!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello this is my first time here i have a small problem.I now live in finland been here for 5 years now but i have a bept in uk with loyds bank a jugment has never been filed and i have a bept colection agency from america chacing me can they do anything as this bept is now 5 years old. I was paying them 50 euros a month but now i stoped that but they are getting nasty.

They dont now my address all they have is my e mail address please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...