Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Abbey Fob Off???? - **I WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

They shouldn't have? I already told the solicitor that the account has been closed and they mentioned getting a cheque issued, as i asked them if they would transfer the money into my new account.

 

Think i will send that email and see what they come back with?

 

Rayo1973:cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would send it now. I only thought they may have used your account because they like to be as obstructive as possible.

 

Good luck with the E-mail

;) nn

FAQs: click here: http://READ THESE

 

Any views or opinions expressed are in good faith, to the best of my ability. I don't like to admit it, but I have been known to be wrong. Check other threads and if in doubt, seek professional advice.

 

 

Abbey: SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

BoS M/card SETTLED 27/09:lol:

Aqua CC (Halifax) SETTLED 28/06 :lol:

GMAC Request for refund 14/6; Prelim 31/7; LBA 11/9

First National Mortgage Data Protection Act sent 14/6 Statements 26/7

Cap 1 - SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

Abbey x 2: 50% offer refused AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed that there are some deadlines that allow for the next working day if it falls on a weekend.(giving the defendant an advantage )

Saw this in the faqs on the hmcs site.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, over an hour now since i sent my email, and no reply.

 

Starting to get hacked off with it all. I am temepted to say "Had your chance, see you in court". But how long should i leave it cause i only have til tomorrow to get the allocation questionnaire completed and ready to go. Not sure what to put in it?

 

Cheers

 

Rayo1973:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick with it you are soooooo close now !

 

Have a look in the bank temps letters section there is info there about allocation questionaire.

 

:D

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the following reply from DLA Piper Rudnik:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Mr Rayo1973,

The delay is simply due to the large number of cases we are dealing with at the moment. Abbey have confirmed they have posted a cheque to me, which I will forward to you immediately on receipt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually how long after you refused the 50% did you wait for your next offer?

I have just sent off my AQs and another £100 because of the deadline which was the 7/8/06

 

ps ........

does anyone know if I need to inform the courts over the £100 or does it automatically get added to your case as a cost?

HUGGY BEAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

My dead line is 30 July.

 

I turned down the 50% and the next day i got the 100%. So stick in there.

 

I have just sent the following email to DLA:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Ms Gordon

Thank you for your prompt reply. I was concerned due to the Allocation Questionnaire timing, but as you have stated they have now dispatched a cheque to you, i accept this as confirmation of intent to pay.

 

Should i complete the AQ and send it off, as i can always withdraw? But if there is extra costs am i responsible? Or do i wait for the cheque based as they have confirmed intention to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the following reply from DLA Piper Rudnik:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Mr Rayo1973,

The delay is simply due to the large number of cases we are dealing with at the moment. Abbey have confirmed they have posted a cheque to me, which I will forward to you immediately on receipt.

 

 

The large number of cases is no suprise.

If they stopped all their stalling efforts and instead started to sort them out then maybe they would not have to keep making these sorts of excuses.

This Email itself is not proof enough that they HAVE sorted you out tho is it ?

 

:mad:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys, getting confused here.

 

I have just read the section on making a deal and the tomlin order. I don't understand how to get one???? Is all this heat melting my brain?

 

Also, if there is no fee with the AQ, does that mean i can send it late?

 

Sorry for being a bit thick here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

read post 34 onwards of lipscombes thread - you can see the email sent to DLA that got them to instigate the tomlin order - or ask lipscombe what happened ???

 

Or just send off the AQ? As there's no fee to pay it means nothing; it just means that you'll have to write to your local court when the cheque's cleared, to tell them the whole thing's off. It doesn't matter at all to be honest...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys

 

I am just about to send the following to DLA:

 

WITHOUT PRJUDICE

Dear Ms Gordon

I have been carefully considering the facts regarding the timescales involved with my claim. As you can appreciate, the deadline for my Allocation Questionnaire is 30 July, but as mentioned earlier this will have to be delivered by Friday 28 July as the 30 July is a Sunday.

I appreciate that you have told me that your client has posted the cheque, however, from researching the matter further on the consumer action group website, i have found that this has been used as a stalling technique on previous instances. I did note that there have been cases whereby there has been the provision of a Tomlin Order. This is a binding order confirming our agreement and states that if the funds are not credited to my account within the fourteen days i am free to apply ("liberty to apply") to the Court to enforce the Order.

Can you please advise on the provision of such an order.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers matey!

 

What do you think of it Stonelaughter? Sound ok? Like the mention of the site (a very subtle - look i know what is going on, we all do and we are fed up being f*cked around by you muppets).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok, i have just sent the email. I thought i might just test the water, besides it means they have it before end of business today - 5 minutes away. Sorry Stonelaughter, i didn't mean any disrespect by not waiting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

Well, surprise surprise, i haven't had a response from DLA after my email yesterday offering them the chance to get a Tomlin Order.

 

When i post the AQ, should i email DLA and tell them i am further pursueing the claim adn going for interest notw too?

 

Cheers

 

Rayo1973:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

god I hope you get it soon Rayo! it's a right downer knowing that they are going to send you the money and then NOT get it! that would drive me mad!

Data Protection Act letter sent 10/04/2006,

priliminary letter sent 23/05/06,

LBA sent 7/06/06

claim issued 23/06/06

deemed to be served 25/06/06

Abbey Acknowledged with intent to defend, they have got until: 23/07/06

50% offered + interest, rejected: 21/07/06

AQ recieved 27/07/06,

AQ posted back 09/08/06

Court date 13/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...