Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off all you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
    • Desperation. They must think people have forgotten what Johnson was like as PM. Tories turn to Boris to combat Farage threat WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK Former PM signs letters to wavering voters amid warning Labour could be in power for a generation if support goes to Reform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Abbey Fob Off???? - **I WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

They shouldn't have? I already told the solicitor that the account has been closed and they mentioned getting a cheque issued, as i asked them if they would transfer the money into my new account.

 

Think i will send that email and see what they come back with?

 

Rayo1973:cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would send it now. I only thought they may have used your account because they like to be as obstructive as possible.

 

Good luck with the E-mail

;) nn

FAQs: click here: http://READ THESE

 

Any views or opinions expressed are in good faith, to the best of my ability. I don't like to admit it, but I have been known to be wrong. Check other threads and if in doubt, seek professional advice.

 

 

Abbey: SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

BoS M/card SETTLED 27/09:lol:

Aqua CC (Halifax) SETTLED 28/06 :lol:

GMAC Request for refund 14/6; Prelim 31/7; LBA 11/9

First National Mortgage Data Protection Act sent 14/6 Statements 26/7

Cap 1 - SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

Abbey x 2: 50% offer refused AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed that there are some deadlines that allow for the next working day if it falls on a weekend.(giving the defendant an advantage )

Saw this in the faqs on the hmcs site.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, over an hour now since i sent my email, and no reply.

 

Starting to get hacked off with it all. I am temepted to say "Had your chance, see you in court". But how long should i leave it cause i only have til tomorrow to get the allocation questionnaire completed and ready to go. Not sure what to put in it?

 

Cheers

 

Rayo1973:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick with it you are soooooo close now !

 

Have a look in the bank temps letters section there is info there about allocation questionaire.

 

:D

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the following reply from DLA Piper Rudnik:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Mr Rayo1973,

The delay is simply due to the large number of cases we are dealing with at the moment. Abbey have confirmed they have posted a cheque to me, which I will forward to you immediately on receipt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually how long after you refused the 50% did you wait for your next offer?

I have just sent off my AQs and another £100 because of the deadline which was the 7/8/06

 

ps ........

does anyone know if I need to inform the courts over the £100 or does it automatically get added to your case as a cost?

HUGGY BEAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

My dead line is 30 July.

 

I turned down the 50% and the next day i got the 100%. So stick in there.

 

I have just sent the following email to DLA:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Ms Gordon

Thank you for your prompt reply. I was concerned due to the Allocation Questionnaire timing, but as you have stated they have now dispatched a cheque to you, i accept this as confirmation of intent to pay.

 

Should i complete the AQ and send it off, as i can always withdraw? But if there is extra costs am i responsible? Or do i wait for the cheque based as they have confirmed intention to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the following reply from DLA Piper Rudnik:

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Mr Rayo1973,

The delay is simply due to the large number of cases we are dealing with at the moment. Abbey have confirmed they have posted a cheque to me, which I will forward to you immediately on receipt.

 

 

The large number of cases is no suprise.

If they stopped all their stalling efforts and instead started to sort them out then maybe they would not have to keep making these sorts of excuses.

This Email itself is not proof enough that they HAVE sorted you out tho is it ?

 

:mad:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys, getting confused here.

 

I have just read the section on making a deal and the tomlin order. I don't understand how to get one???? Is all this heat melting my brain?

 

Also, if there is no fee with the AQ, does that mean i can send it late?

 

Sorry for being a bit thick here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

read post 34 onwards of lipscombes thread - you can see the email sent to DLA that got them to instigate the tomlin order - or ask lipscombe what happened ???

 

Or just send off the AQ? As there's no fee to pay it means nothing; it just means that you'll have to write to your local court when the cheque's cleared, to tell them the whole thing's off. It doesn't matter at all to be honest...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys

 

I am just about to send the following to DLA:

 

WITHOUT PRJUDICE

Dear Ms Gordon

I have been carefully considering the facts regarding the timescales involved with my claim. As you can appreciate, the deadline for my Allocation Questionnaire is 30 July, but as mentioned earlier this will have to be delivered by Friday 28 July as the 30 July is a Sunday.

I appreciate that you have told me that your client has posted the cheque, however, from researching the matter further on the consumer action group website, i have found that this has been used as a stalling technique on previous instances. I did note that there have been cases whereby there has been the provision of a Tomlin Order. This is a binding order confirming our agreement and states that if the funds are not credited to my account within the fourteen days i am free to apply ("liberty to apply") to the Court to enforce the Order.

Can you please advise on the provision of such an order.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers matey!

 

What do you think of it Stonelaughter? Sound ok? Like the mention of the site (a very subtle - look i know what is going on, we all do and we are fed up being f*cked around by you muppets).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok, i have just sent the email. I thought i might just test the water, besides it means they have it before end of business today - 5 minutes away. Sorry Stonelaughter, i didn't mean any disrespect by not waiting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

Well, surprise surprise, i haven't had a response from DLA after my email yesterday offering them the chance to get a Tomlin Order.

 

When i post the AQ, should i email DLA and tell them i am further pursueing the claim adn going for interest notw too?

 

Cheers

 

Rayo1973:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

god I hope you get it soon Rayo! it's a right downer knowing that they are going to send you the money and then NOT get it! that would drive me mad!

Data Protection Act letter sent 10/04/2006,

priliminary letter sent 23/05/06,

LBA sent 7/06/06

claim issued 23/06/06

deemed to be served 25/06/06

Abbey Acknowledged with intent to defend, they have got until: 23/07/06

50% offered + interest, rejected: 21/07/06

AQ recieved 27/07/06,

AQ posted back 09/08/06

Court date 13/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...