Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC cancel cheque


sidtheranger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6253 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I am submitting this for my friend who has just moved and not got his internet connection sorted.

He has filed a claim against HSBC for an amount in the region of £4 -£5k.

He filed his claim thru the local County Court with his fee ( paid with by HSBC cheque), and the bank had until Apr 27th to respond. Heard nothing, so on Mon 30th, he contacted the Court to see about next stage. He was told, by court staff, that the cheque had been stopped by the bank.

Now, he is in credit, so that is not the reason it was stopped. He contacted the branch and they were unable to find out why.

Is this the new tactic to ensure more time for the bank? As he now has to start the Court process again.

I am a cynical old sod and I suspect foul play here, I know it's not Colonel Mustard and the Dagger type stuff but still, when the 'Money Men' are threatened, who knows what they will do.

 

As an aside, a QC has been appointed in Guildford to deal with all such claims, his role, it seams, is to prevent further time wasting by banks who defend and then pay out at the 11th hour. This info was passed to me by somebody at a local County Court in Surrey. They have been asked to pass all defended actions to Guildford.

It seams the Courts have had enough of the banks shenanigans.

Bear with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you got any written evidence to say that the cheque was stopped? was there a cheque guarantee card number on the back?? i'm flabbergasted that the bank can stop a cheque if there IS sufficient funds in the account!:eek:

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That does sound very suspicious, what a pain. Art least you may be able to use this as 'evidence' of the banks apparent & alledged time wasting and stalling tactics if you ever get to the point where you need to submit the court bundle (unlikely).

 

I have just spoken to someone at my local court and she seemed to know exactly what's happening in terms of proceedures for penatly charge claims, knew it off the top of her head. I'm sure there isn't a court in the country that is not overrun with such claims and know exatly what the banks are like. Time for something to change! Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Netty and Nightmare,

I believe that the cheque had card number on back. I'm not sure if my pal has written proof of cheque refusal but I will tell to get it if possible.

I am sure that the Courts must be getting very sick of the banks and their tactics and its a good thing that we have, in this country, many diligent staff at the courts who are working hard on this.

This is the most extreme act of time wasting from banks that I've seen personally. Myself, I have had missing statements and no statements at all from GE Money. But that's another story that I am about to post in the relevant area.

Any how, thanks again and I shall pass all info across.

All strength to your arm.:)

Bear with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

netty why so shocked? we know they already stopped a maintenance payment in my case and then denied all knowledge, so something like this, if fully accurate, shouldn't really come as any great surprise.

 

don't know if we're getting into the realm of libel here or not so I'm stopping at this point, just wanted to say that IF they have stopped the cheque out of some sort of retaliatory action for daring to claim against them, then I'm not entirely shocked

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...