Jump to content


Is Something Missing??


GaryTravers
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no, Gary, it just means that if they want to object to the strike out, they have to file by a certain date, that date being decided by a judge, but, the judge may not give them the option, so leave it as it is

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

again thanks lula, you are a legend..

 

thats me done, can i simply send the lot to abbey and bring in a copy to the court as it is (as in, do i need to mark it as a copy for each, or will the same thing do for both of them?)

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, if you have marked them then thats fine, although I would make sure that the one for the bank has your name and claim number and address on it

  • Haha 1

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, sorted.

 

thank you lula, appreciate the help :)

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that robdblynd..

 

though i have just seen that i have somehow been a real donut :(

 

i sent off the AQ with its attachments to abbey, but on attachment 2A (draft order), i may have the same name, mine for claimant and defendant for the very first bit...

 

im giving the aq plus attachments into court now, correctly printed, but does anyone know how big a deal this will be? :confused:

 

feel so stupid, only hoping the courts' copy is more important....

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

any ideas on that one guys? sorry to bug but i cant stop wondering about it...

 

also, i received a copy of abbeys AQ today and have some questions on that;

 

"A - Settlement

 

Do you wish there to be a one month stay to atempt to settle the claim, either by informal discussion or by alternate dispute resolution?"

 

they said yes.... is this simply them stalling, or is it likely they will make an offer? or if they are just wasting more time, can anything be done about it?

 

"D - Case Management Information

 

.....Witnesses

 

So far as you know at this stage, what witnesses of fact do you intend to call at the trial or final hearing including, if apropriate, yourself?"

 

they have 'Bank Officer' as witness to 'Charges applied to account'

 

is that normal?also the 'amount of claim in dispute' is £200.02 more than the amount i have on my spreadsheet.....any ideas?

 

 

currently nail biting the work day away....

 

 

thanks in advance, Gary

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right gary, Witness for yourself is "nil", and as to the differing amounts, if you are sure that yours are correct, use them. Dont worry about what theyt put on their AQ, its a load of bologny anyway :-))

 

Oh yes and with the settlement, you put no, it will just delay matters and should concentrate their little minds

 

Hope this helps

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks lula, i had already put 'no' on mine, and given it in, was just wondering as they had put 'yes' on theirs..

 

what do you think to my previous predicament, about the banks copy having the same name on a draft order... but i corrected it for the courts copy...

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary, I dont think it matters one iota, you are only giving them a copy as a curtesy, as long as the court one is correct, its ok :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:wink: thanks again

 

 

EDIT - sorry forgot to ask, would it be wise to go through the court bundle stuff now or wait to see if i get a court date?

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

cleaning the garage out today, you always catch me when i am cleaning or tidying LOL

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha, anything to get away from cleaning eh?

 

either that or you love me that much :grin:

 

but seriously i appreciate all the help you have given me :)

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok, im back..

 

been away for a little while but now im back and the court date is fast approaching, so i need to get cracking with the court bundle...so i guess there will be more questions soon on the way

 

EDIT - adding this Q..

 

for the list of settled cases for the court bundle, or 'cases relied upon', im assuming i am using the relevant bank details from this page?

 

if so, i seem to be getting the results in a gif file, fair enough, but the font of the text generated seems hard to read. its like a 'courier new' font, similar to what typewriters produced, but this seems a little broken.... is it just a problem my end or is it normal and ok? :rolleyes:

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

bump?

 

Also, with the schedule of charges to be submitted this time, should i use the same ones as i submitted from the court claim or the current ones?

 

(by current ones i mean those with th updated 8% interest calculations as obviously the dates will have changed...)

 

thanks

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone?

 

really panicking now as i'll need to submit my papers tomorrow, yet i dont seem to be getting replies..

 

(i've come into work to get this done, what a sunday :-|)

 

also can i just use copies of the statement pages that have charges on? (and leave out the rest?

 

thanks

13 July 06 - Data Protection Act request sent to NatWest :-|

7 August - Natwest want to 'discuss my account':???:

9 August - "HISTORIC STMNT FEE- £5.00" showing on online bank

16 August - Statements Arrived, tatty brown sellotaped envelope:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...