Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • have a read of these Programmable Search Engine (google.com) clickme^^
    • As per my last post you cant get a default judgment because they have Acknowledged service of claim...therefor getting the full 33 days. You can manually request judgment using form N225 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-n225-request-for-judgment-and-reply-to-admission-specified-amount Andy
    • ((((((((( sigh )))))))))   Theyre a pair of #*!#*# ! After 30 minutes of Fb messages repeatedly saying they wont refund then they will but only a credit note and then saying i have to go up next Wednesday to get a refund and now theyre saying theyll come to me to give a refund ... Ive not replied and i'll wait untill tomorrow as i think the letter of claim should arrive.     Edit   What theyre bow saying us they have to inspect the phone to see if i gavent somehow put the devis behind the camera lens which is a ploy to say ive done it and then they wont give a refund, theyre oestering me to either go up next Wednesday or fir them to come down to me , ive asjed 3 times how debris can get behind a Samsung A71 screen which wont explain and reply with Do you want your refund or not ...  So, can i refuse their examination and then their supposed refund as i think its a scam    
    • My apologies,  I never know how much to redact. Yes I have done the AOS.    Particulars of Claim: THE DEFENDANT OWES THE CLAIMANT £293.13 IN REPECT OF GAS/ELECTRICITY CHARGES SUPPLIED TO THE DEFENDANT BY OVO ENERGY LTD (DEBT) WHICH DEBT WAS ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON 31/12/2022 AND NOTICE OF WHICH WAS GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT ON 31/12/2022. DESPITE FORMAL DEMAND FOR PAYMENT OF THE DEBT THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PAY AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £293.13 AND FURTHER CLAIMS INTEREST THEREUPON PURSUANT TO SECTION 69 OF THE COUNTY COURT ACT 1984 LIMITED TO ONE YEAR TO THE DATE HEREOF AT THE RATE OF 2.34% PER ANNUM AMOUNTING TO £6.86   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Long and Hunt Vs Alliance and Leicester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have just sent my second letter to a and l detailing charges and giving them 14 days to come back! Cant wait to hear from them!!! Not getting myself excited because its only the beginning of a very long slog I am sure! In truth I am expecting a second fob off letter but who knows!

 

My claim is for a total of £2537.00 over a 20 month period - we only had this account a short time and I am pleased to say that I no longer bank with a and l!!

 

I will let you know what they come back with - if anything!!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a query!

 

I called a and l today to enquire as to whether they had received the letter that I sent first class last weds detailing charges etc etc. Just wanted to keep the pressure on them! I was told that they hadnt received my letter and no notes re a letter had been added to my account.

I told them that I would send it again in that case. I advised them that my letter was sent to the personal banking HQ in bootle - merseyside.

 

I was advised by the call taker that I should send the letter to a PO Box number in London - surely they will receive my letter at their HQ and deal with it or pass it on. You cant tell me that if it isnt mean for that department they just throw it in the bin without adding notes to the account!!!!

 

The fact that my account is with a recovery dept was the reason I was told to send to send it to a PO Box but I still cant believe that they just wouldnt deal with the letter when its received in Bootle!!

 

Do you think I should re send the letter to the PO Box or call them again to find out the situation?? (I was calling from work so couldnt exactly go into details!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only MHO, but stick to the Bootle address, it's worked fine for other claimants.

Send the letter again, recorded or special delivery, then they can't claim non-receipt!

Don't waste your time and money on phone calls, you'd probably get different advice everytime. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...