Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GOT A COURT DATE? Important, please read......


GaryH
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5713 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Gary

Sorry to post on this thread, but couldn't think how else to get your attention?

Firstly, did you get my PM about the info I have, I think it could be quite telling?

Secondly, my claim is now in full swing. Recieved acknowledgement of service and intent to defend.

Guess it's now wait for the defence and possibly an AQ.

All due within next 14 days.

Do I post info regards Litigation in Process to someone ?

Regards

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 447
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have a court date and have followed all your advise, we have just get a letter from the judge saying that if SC&M do not meet with the order the case will be struck out without further notice. We may apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days. What does all this mean please.

From Potterlogo :confused:

 

Potterlogo

 

I may not be able to answer this question myself, and someone like Gary may.

In order to help him and others provide you with advice on this, could you post an outline (remove any of your personally identifiable info) of what order the judge has asked SCM to comply with ?

Also, was it in response to draft directions that you suggested yourself in an AQ, or was it an order made of the courts own motion?

 

Regards

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Potterlogo

 

Firstly, remove your case number from your last post, it may enable you to be identified.

 

So you've applied for a strikeout, presumably on the merits of their defence?

 

Here's the lnk for anyone interested:

 

CPR - Parts and Practice Directions

 

And it looks like the judge has agreed it has merit, but given SCM some leeway to correct it.

 

I suggest you contact the court next week and get their advise on whether they have complied, and if not, what happens next.

 

 

Best regards

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I 've recieved a letter headed

 

"Notice Of Hearing"

 

TAKE NOTICE that the hearing will take place on......then saying they have allowed 10 minutes for the hearing. at the bootom it says

 

PLEASE NOTE; This case may be released to another Judge, possibly at a different court.

 

This letter is stamped with my local County Court mark.

 

What should I do from here? Do I need to send anything off?

 

Regards

 

BB

 

Broomo

 

CONTACT SOME MODS BY PM NOW AS A MATTER OF URGENCY.

 

INFORM THEM YOU HAVE A COURT DATE !!!

 

PHOTOMAN

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am concerned, even if they do honour a payment and charge you for doing so, the additional charge is still a penalty.

In such a case they would not be charging the usual returned item "fee", as the item has not been returned, instead they would charge you for an exceeded borrowing level.

It is applied to your account as a result of exceeding a limit, and exists purely "in terrorem" to dissuade you from such breaches.

In Lloyds case certainly, any "service" argument is nonsense, and easily dispelled by the very wording itself of the charge applied "unauthorised borrowing fee"...... this clearly requires something of an "unauthorised" nature to have happened, ie, a breach of contract.

Had it been termed as an "overdraft review fee" or "overdraft extension fee" or something such like, they may have maybe had a stronger argument (although the Sale of Goods act would say otherwise).

The banks are actively changing the terminology now in light of current actions, and this may make it harder to prove the "penal" nature of the charge in future....... however this now smacks of concealment, and such acts bring into play the revocation of any protection under statute of limitations.

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Ok,I really want to get my bundle finished off tonight as it has to be in soon. I have a few questions and would be very very grateful if anyone can help.

 

firstly, should I include the Austalian report in my bundle? If so what do I need to add to my witness statement??

 

2, If I include the Australian report do I need to include the scottish report??

 

3, Do I need to print of the whole of the analisys of the unfair terms schedule 2 or just certain pages??

 

4, does anyone have the link for the early day motion from the house of parliment??

 

5, Do I include the information that mistermind gave about charges only being about £3 in Dublin?? This to me seems like a good argument against lloyds in particular as even if they are fees rather than penalties this surely proves they are dispropotionate. Also if I do add this to my bundle,again how do I include this in my witness statement. I dont want to mess it up by saying that they are fees??

 

Thanks very much in advance to anyone that can help.

 

matt.

 

Matty

 

See this post by GuidoT

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-906900.html

 

PM

  • Haha 1

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Can someone help??

 

I've just recieved a letter from the court, it say's..

 

It is ordered that the claimant do file with the court, further particulars of claim and do serve the defendant with the same by 4.00pm on 16th july 2007 after which date the file will be referred to the district judge for further directions. In failure thereof the claimants claim will be struck out.

 

The district judges of this court require the amount of bank charges claimed in the claim form to be particularised showing how the total amount claimed is arrived at by specifying the date, amount and type of each charge claimed. It is not acceptable to merely file or annex copy bank statements even if the relevant charges are highlighted thereon.

 

does this mean i only need to send in a breakdown of the chages? and why would bank statements not be acceptable??

 

Gary,

 

No, 'fraid the court won't work out your charges for you from your statements, it's not their job it is your job as the claimant.

 

Don't worry though, it's actually quite a reasonable and fair letter, they could have chosen to just throw your claim out all together.

 

Let me guess..... youv'e come here after reading about bank charges elsewhere ( a newspaper or another website perhaps) and already started a claim ?

 

Welcome to CAG. your in safe hands now, but you will have to do most of the work yourself, and get to understand what this is all about. This is a self help site, so nobody else is going to do everything for you, but they will all be as helpful and friendly as possible.

 

You do have a bit of reading to do to start off, and you should also start your own thread, so as not clog up this one with unrelated comments.

 

SO;

 

First of all read the Frequently asked questions here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

DO READ THE STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS !!!!!!

As you go on, you’ll also find this very helpful:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

You’ll then need to start your own thread;

Go to here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/

 

Find the name of the Bank your action will be against.

Click on it (the name of the Bank in Bold Blue)

On that page, you will then find a label saying "Forum Tools" (just under the list of page numbers).

Click on it. It will show you some options.

Firstly, it's a good idea to subscribe to the Forum ,as you'll then recieve updates from people in similar situatioins against the same Bank. So click on Subscribe. It will ask how often you want updates (Personally I like Daily).

Once Subscibed to the Forum it will redirect you back.

Hit the same button and choose "Start new thread"

Give your Thread a title eg: yourforumname v whatever bank

(choose how often you want updating by email if anyone posts responses in your thread)

 

Then your up and running !:-)

 

Whilst your there, you might want to take some time to have a look at some of the threads by people taking action against your same Bank, very helpful. Remember, any threads you want to follow, you can either choose the thread tools button, and choose subscribe to thread, or simply whenever you make a post in a thread it will automatically subscribe you to that thread.

On the main page I've posted above, you'll also find lots of highlighted "stickies", which have lots of very informative stuff in them too.

Once your ready to start , you’ll need to do a schedule of charges to submit to the bank, try this one:

http://www.zen122856.zen.co.uk/CompoundSheet_v1.9.xls

 

Best regards and good luck

 

photoman

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tina

Don't panic.

Part C you can get help with from this post by GaryH

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-482194.html

 

Part D you can get from here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=138&Itemid=82

 

If you could post which Bank you are dealing with, then I'm sure someone might email you any T&C's you might need?

 

Hope this is useful, I'm sure peeps like Gary will be along soon enough too to help you.

 

For what it's worth, the directions from the court are good news.

Looks like they have accepted the new directions.

Which Court was it ?

 

Once you have complied with your part of the directions, it is unlikeley that the Bank will comply with their side, and will just offer to settle.

 

Best regards

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...