Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alliance & Leicester


EEK!!!
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6354 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just to keep everyone up to date;

 

I sent my first letter to my local branch, I didn't need to ask for duplicate statements as I already have them all, giving them 7 days. No reply I've given them until today to respond (a simply we're looking into it would have sufficed) however no correspondence. So today I've sent them the Letter before Action giving them 14 days.

 

I feel that I've been resonably with my time allowance.

 

Has anyone else been ignored ny A&L?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent my first letter, recieved reply exactly 7 days later, fob off really. They said would look into it and get back to me. Delay tactics!!!!

So have sent a letter before action giving them 14 days to refund charges or will see them in court, prepared to go all the way if needed.

Havent found anyone yet who has recieved refund or has logged claim with Alliance so quite worried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recieved my first letter from A&L today. I've already sent my Letter before Action letter , must have crossed in the post. However the letter is dated 27th Feb I'm not sure why it took 4 days to get here and it's over the 7 day deadline I gave them in the original letter so I shouldn't feel to bad for already sending the LBA letter!!!

 

Anyway it basically says;

 

Dear Miss EEK!!!

 

I am writing in response to your recent commincation and was very sorry to learn of your disappointment with the service you have recieved.

 

Thank you for taking the time to highlight your concerns, we are currently looking into the situation and will be writing to you with a more detailed response.

 

In the meantime, i am enclosing a leaflet which explains the steps we will take to handle your complaint.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

P Banning

 

Probably just a standard letter we're all getting

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a reply to my first letter, however I've already sent my Letter before Action as it's taken them so long to reply;

 

Dear Miss EEK!!!

 

Thank you for your letter of 15 February 2006.

 

I have examined the charges raised on your account and can confirm that they are correct and have been raised in accordance with our published tariff. In view of this and after further consideration I do not feel that a refund is appropriate.

 

I have arranged for details to be sent to you under separate cover to explain how to obtain information we have recorded under the Data Protection Act.

 

I hope we will now be able to draw this matter to a close and if I do not hear from you within the next 8 weeks, will assume this is the case. However in accordance with regulatory requirements, I am enclosing our leaflet which explains the steps you would need to take if you should wish to pursue this matter further, including the ultimate availability of the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

If you need any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

P Banning

Retail Financial Services

 

Shall I just wait for my reply from my letter before action? (Thanks in advance)&

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you should let the time given in your Letter before Action lapse, then file, even though they have made it clear they are not willing to pay already. By taking so long in answering, they're dictating the pace, it's time to do things YOUR way.

 

So, if you've given them 7 or 14 days in your LBA, wait for that date to lapse, then go for it. Would THEY let you dawdle and hum and haw before paying up? Of course not, you only have to see how quickly they charged you when you went over your limit!

 

Let us know how you get on, and good luck. If/when you file your claim, don't forget to tell Dave or BankFodder so they can add it to the list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, prepare the claim and prepare yourself also fro a possible court case.

 

read the guidance notes, ask questions if you have any and start trawling through the forum for anything which looks like useful evidence.

 

If you seen any references frm any one to any useful letters or dicuments, then contact them and ask for a copy for your evidence file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been collecting useful bits and pieces for my own case. They are unstructured but if any one iis interested I'll gladly share

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone have a quick look at this, it's my particulars of claim, to see if's ok. ShouldI put in that I want to claiim back my court fees? Thanks in advance.

 

I had a contract with Alliance and Leicester plc from January 05 until July 05 which was conducted on their standard terms and conditions. I am claiming the return of money taken by Alliance and Leicester in the way of charges in 2005 plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

I have asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so.

I claim interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 5th January 2005 to 11th March 2006} of £295.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 8%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a money claim or an N1?

 

You haven't included the total of the charges which you are claiming.

Your interest claim for 6 months is absoultely massive at £295 so I think you are making a bad mistake soemwhere and the daily continuing interest must be a figure of 0.xxxpence per day - not the percentage

that's just for starters, sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the super fast rapid response! :D

 

Sorry for the errors it's still early :roll:

 

It's a money claim. Ok here it is with a few ammendments.

 

I had a contract with Alliance and Leicester plc from January 05 until July 05 which was conducted on their standard terms and conditions. I am claiming the return of money taken by Alliance and Leicester in

the way of charges in 2005 of £295.00 plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so. I claim interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 5th January 2005 to 11th March 2006} of £24.42 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.022%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's more like it.

But if they defend, are you prepared? Do you thnk you can make a case?

You need to be sure of yourself because you could be the one they decide to make a stand with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is what I have shown you sufficient to put in my money claim. Would you tweak it in any way?

 

I have all of my bank statements and I have this great forum to gather evidence and information and if I ask really nicely then I'm sure everyone here will be 100% behind me. I'm sure by the time it all comes around, if it does, then I'll be more than ready to take them on. It's just a waiting game now to see what reply I get from my LBA. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well people I know it's been a while but I thought I should give you an update. I submitted my claim on the 10th April and I've had my acknowlwdgement today saying A&L intend to defend the claim. They now have 28 days from the 19th April to file a defence. So now it's just a case of waiting until the 17th May 06.

 

Keep everything crossed ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ditto, received reply to LOC this morning stating A&L intention to defend. I am confident this is a standard stalling tactic (but for some people it may just put them off as the next step is court). On the other hand, perhaps they do this to give them time to issue cheque!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys.

 

Good to know I'm not going this alone. It'll be interesting to see if we all get the same treatment and letters etc.

 

Out of curiousity did either of you get a letter from A&L saying;

 

Dear Miss EKK!!!,

 

Re: Yourself against Alliance & Leicester plc

Northampton County Court Claim No. 6QZ3336

 

We confirm that we have filed the Acknowledgement of Service with Northampton County Court indicating our intention to defend proceedings.

 

Your faithfully,

 

pp (signed bu someone else)

 

Jackie McGuirk

Solicitor

Litigation Team

 

Good Luck fingers crossed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great isn't it! I'm actually looking forward to it. Its my fiances claim but I'm sorting it all out for her, and have informed her that if anybody from A&L tries to call her to discuss it, to refuse to speak to them and demand any communication is in writing (as shes not the most calm of people on the phone!!!)

 

I've not had that letter (yet), although the 'solicitor' mentioned (jackie) is the same one on my acknowledgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick note Eek, we had our claim settled this morning via a cheque for the full amount of the court summons (£2254). Absolutely fantastic, The original claim was only for £1650 but after adding all the expenses/interest on we've made £600 profit!

 

Absolutely chuffed to bits. I'll definately be shoving an amazon voucher in the post!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just taken A&L to Court re a £34 charge. They replied saying they were going to defend the claim. 2 days later they sent me cheque saying they had "reviewed my case" and were paying out in full but that thia did not represent an admission of liability on their part.

 

Apparently they are going to be contacting me regarding the future operation of my account. I will let you know if they try any bully boy tactics....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly congratulations to you both on getting back you money.

 

The best news of all though see below:

 

Dear Miss EEK!!

 

RE: Yourself against Alliance & Leicester plc

Northampton County Court Claim No. 6QZ23336

 

Further to our letter of the 24th April we hace revieved your particular case and have decided in this instance to settle the claim.

 

This decision should not be reagrded as an admission of liability on the part of the company, nor should it be regarded as any sign of weakness on our part as we consider the charges to be fair and reasonable.

 

We therefore now enclose our cheque in the sum of £373.24 paid in full and final settlement of your claim. Would you please acknowledge receipt and write to Northampton County Court confirming that the case has been settled.

 

As it is clear that you do not accept the terms and conditions for the operation of your account we will be contacting you shortly to discuss its future operation.

 

Yours faithfully

 

pp'd

 

Jackie McGuirk

Solicitor

Litigation Team

 

I'm looking forward to the call reference my future operation of the account considering it's been closed for about 6 months!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6354 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...