Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Do I have to attend court?


louiseace
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6205 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I'm new :) Abbey have defended my claim - aggghh! I have just received an allocated questionnaire to fill in and send back to court - will I have to attend when I get a court date? :o Abbey have so far offered me 50% of my claim but I've refused, I hope I've done the right thing :???: I'm starting to get very nervous about the whole thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, welcome to CAG:).

 

In short, the answer is yes - if you are called to a hearing you must attend. Faliure to do so would more than likely result in the striking out of your claim, I.e. you lose! It should also be said that if you were not prepared to go to court then you should not filed a court claim.

 

That said, stastisticly the chances of the claim actually getting that far are miniscule - only a handful of cases out of thousands have reached a final hearing, and none whatsoever involving Abbey as far as I am aware.

 

They have in every claim so far paid in full before the hearing, and the process of filing a defence and allocation questionnaire is pretty much just an attempt to put you off and intimidate you. They are hoping that you drop out, becouse actually they a lot more worried about court than you are! Once you've jumped through all the hoops and navigated the various proceedural obsticles, they pay up. Its not handed to you on a plate though unfortunately, you must prepare and build your case and comply in full with court orders, etc.

 

Heres some help with the AQ;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html

 

Plus have a read around the Abbey forum to get an idea of how they operate, especially useful will be the 'successes' forum - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-cahoot-successes/

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Is this accurate? On my letter stating the date it says that if you can not, or wish not to attend, you must do so within 7 days of the hearing and the judge will hear your case for you, In my case I am on holiday for my date and cannot go. This does not mean I should not have filed a case if I 'wasnt prepared to go', as you said int he previous post. Not everyone can drop everything for a 15 minute hearing that they specify the date of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats between you and the court. If you notify the court 7 days in advance then they may allow your case to be heard in your absence, yes, as is stated on the notice of allocation - but you've got to ask yourself would you really want to have your case heard on the basis only of your statement of case? I know I would'nt.

 

If you want to do this then I suggest that you file and serve a full witness statement setting out your evidence in some detail.

 

What I said was 100% correct - if your not prepared to go to court, don't file the claim. There are far to many who will rush off without reading the FAQ's thinking its a couple of letters and you get your money back, then when a defence drops through the door its complete panic stations, and a lot of claimants actually drop out at that point. Subsequantly we get claimants just not turning up for court dates left right and centre, which hardly endears our cause to the judiciary, does it?

 

"Not prepared" to go to court and "can't" go are two different things. If there is a genuine reason you can't make the date then you can apply to the court who will move the date, providing you do it in plenty of time.

 

There is also a space in the allocation questionnaire which asks you specifically which dates you are not availible so that the court can allocate around them.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Just out of interest - if a claimant does drop the case before it goes to court, will they have to pay Lloyds' solicitor fees or court fees or anything? and if so - are these intimidation tactics fair?

If you didn't turn up in court and the other side did, they could quite reasonably request costs on the grounds you have behaved unreasonably. And your claim would be struck out.

 

The banks tactics aren't fair IMHO, no, but unfortunately most courts allow them to get away with it. That said you do have a choice whether you file a claim or not and when you do you should be prepared that it will go to court. It probably won't, but thats not the point

 

If you notify the court in advance you can have the case heard on written submissions.

 

Small claims court certainly isn't anything to worry about though anyway - its very informal and relaxed. Just you the judge and the other side sat around a table in an office.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...