Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

re PPI OFFER


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am claiming back my Husbands PPI on his loan they have sent a offer of £1,162.48 WITH INTEREST! This was a FIXED SUM LOAN and they say they will take this off the loan if he excepts, what shall i do? can anybody help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sonic,

Well it is your Money, so it is up to you how you want the Money paid back, as usual they are applying a condition. Lloyds tried that with me too, I accepted the amound that they offered (Full Amount + Interest) and I requested that the Money was refunded by means of a cheque.. They sent me a cheque.

 

Ian

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there reidnet

 

yes thats what we was hoping for a nice cheque, but as my husband only took the loan out last year would we still be intitled to the money?

 

Who's money are we talking about? your's I think?

 

They took it from you and therefore should return it to you.

Personally I would have the cheque and then you can make the decision of whether or not you paid that amount of the loan.

 

I agree with reidnet, they are still controlling it.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I had this battle with LloydsTSB and unfortunately because my loan accounts were still open they simply deducted the refunds and interest from the amount outstanding. This happened in two of my claims - I received a cheque for the third one which concerned a closed account.

 

I won two of these cases via the FSO. Unfortunately their "brief" is to return the claimant to the position they were in had the mis-selling not occurred. In my case this meant a smaller loan which did not include PPI. This in turn meant that the loan amount was reduced and I could not get a cheque as a refund merely that the loan was recalculated using the original date and the smaller total. I should point out that these were business loans so I don't know if made a difference. Although I would dearly have liked a cheque there are some advantages in what happened. I now owe a lot less and my monthly premiums are much lower so I suppose that I have to accept (very grudgingly) what happened and bearing in mind all my circumstances it was for the best. Ah well, dreams of a good holiday on the back burner again!

 

Keith

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there keith

thanks for your reply, i,m not sure what to do now? It does say on the letter that refund will be taken off against loan with interest (on a ex-gratia basis?) what ever that means? and if he wishes to reduce monthly payments then the loan will have to be rescheduled. Also it says if he is dissatisfied with their decision you do have the option of escalating matters within Lloyds Ins?

 

any idea,s would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What happened in my case was they ran a printout of the payments I had made. They then ran another one but making payments as they would have been if the ppi had not been included. They difference between the two is interest due to be refunded plus the actual ppi payments. Thats how they calculated it and to within a few pence it came out to what I expected. My two loans were recheduled once I had the refund but the APR was much much better (4.9% lower) then I had originally so it was better all round for me. Depending on your circumstances it might be worth looking at your APR and seeing what they would offer on a rescheduled loan as over time you might save a great deal of money in addition to getting the refund. If the APR is likely to be higher then clearly its not an option nor is it if you need to have a cheque.

 

If they are making you an ex-gratia payment does the letter say it is their final response? If not they are obviously expecting you to try to negotiate further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there keith

thanks for your reply, i,m not sure what to do now? It does say on the letter that refund will be taken off against loan with interest (on a ex-gratia basis?) what ever that means? and if he wishes to reduce monthly payments then the loan will have to be rescheduled. Also it says if he is dissatisfied with their decision you do have the option of escalating matters within Lloyds Ins?

 

any idea,s would be appreciated

 

Hello,

 

I think that you have two choices.

 

1. agree to have the amount taken of the loan and that is that, but be aware what does the loan will have to be rescheduled. A new loan with probably a higher interest rate I think. This will recope the amount they are giving you I think. New terms and conditions. Also what was the actual ppi fee plus interest, are they being fair. Becareful and do what is best for you

 

2, Argue with them, that In fact the money was taken from you by their mis-selling of this ppi and that you wish to have the money in your hand. The money that they took for the ppi was yours and the fact that they took it, they deprived you of the choice of how you would have spent it.

 

I am having a bit of a fight with one company who mis-lead me into paying for a ppi 5years ago, which they admit. The payments were extortionate and I ended up being defaulted on the loan. They are now trying to refund me the £5,060 to themselves,:eek: but I am not having it. And I will fight to the death for it(not literally). I was not given a choice by them about this money. I do believe I would have found a better cause for it than ppi.:confused:

 

Have a look at my thread on a mission v ppi.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...