Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

log book loans help please!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been reading through various different threads on this forum regarding LBL, and to be honest I'm horrified. My partner recently passed her test and we bought a car earlier this year. However as we are on benefits and caring for a disabled child we couldn't afford to insurance the car in my partners name, so we insured it in her fathers name and put her on as a named driver. However for the policy to be legal we had to transfer the car into her fathers name because the policyholder also has to be the registered keeper. Anyway we found out the other day that her father has taken a loan out on the car with LBL without our knowledge. We actully found this out from a third party and have now gotten copies of the agreements that had been given to him from LBL. To be honest I can't believe this company can get away with giving out these kind of loans. The first payment isn't due for another few weeks yet, but I have no doubt that her father will not be able to afford to make the payments as he is himself on disability benefits, and after reading what some of the people on this forum have gone through with these cowboys I am absolutely s*****g myself. The loan amount is only £700 but the APR is 402.7% (is this legal)? His repayments are £33 per week (He only gets £72) and to end the agreement early we would have to cough up nearly £1800, which is totaly out of the question. (At the moment I haven't got £18).

 

Anyway what I want to ask is where do we stand with regards the legality of the agreement as the person who took out the loan was only the registered keeper and not the owner. I have an invoice which states I purchased the car. Also is the above apr legal? One other thing according to the agreement the early settlement figures increase rather than decrease. For example if we want to pay back after one quarter it would cost us £1400 but to pay back after three quarters has elapsed will cost us £1800. Surely this can't be right.

 

If anyone has any advice to offer I would realy appreciate it and if you need any further info please let me know. I hope somebody can help because these people seem to prey on the vulnerable, who they know can't afford to fight back.

thanks

timpo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

402%!!! That's worse than most loan sharks!! I would contact your local Trading Standards, I'm not sure if there's an upper limit on apr

 

I did consider doing that, however from reading these boards I have come to the conclusion that Trading standards have been as much use as a chocolate fireguard when it comes to this company. I also don't want LBL to get wind that this agreement is being questioned until I know for sure whether it is legal. Who knows what they may do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get some legal advise or visit CAB A.S.A.P,they wont hang around much once you default (know from experience) hopefully you'll get a reply from lbl on here he/she is pretty clued up on this company.Also get in touch with BBC WATCHDOG they are interested in LBL.And look at over threads there/s a email address for TS with a complaint number,send complaint to them using that number.Keep us imformed on situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Having read your post, a couple of pointers that may be of interest.

 

1) Your partner's father has actually committed fraud in acquiring this loan, as he will have signed a "declaration of ownership" confirming that he indeed owns the car and is free to secure a loan upon it. Unfortunately, to invalidate the security on these grounds, you would actually have to file a complaint with the police.

 

2) The APR is "legal" as such, but could be declared "an extortionate credit bargain" by the court if it can be shown that in the individual case the terms are unreasonable. This could possibly be the case in the event that your partner's father clearly cannot afford the loan.

 

3) The "early settlement" figures you have quoted are the total you would repay under the agreement including all weekly payments made up to and including the date of settlement. So yes, after three quarters of the term, it would be significantly higher than after one quarter.

 

If you are prepared to report your partner's father to the police, you could possibly have the loan overturned, but you would be leaving yourself open to difficulties from your insurance company, as a named driver is not supposed to be the main driver of the car. The best advice I can give at this time is to make sure the payments are kept up to date while you explore your options, and obtain independent legal advice.

 

Hope this helps

 

lbl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Double Cheese, it sounds like timpo's loan had what logbook loans call "advanced payment plan" built in, as he has said that the first payment isn't due for a few weeks. This will up the amount of the loan, although he will only have received the £700. £33 per week sounds about right in that case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for your input. Calling the police is definately not an option. Going by what lbl says we have no option but to make sure payments are made. Doublecheese lbl is correct. It would seem that he deffered payments for 5 weeks, hence the higher repayments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

timpo1981 - If you are prepared to ensure that the payments are made, do not under any circumstances let Logbook Loans know that your partner's father does not own the car. If you do, they will seek one of three remedies:

 

1) To report your partner's father to the police for obtaining the loan fraudulently and sue him civilly for the full amount of the loan including interest and legal costs.

or

 

2) Terminate the loan agreement, and seek to repossess the car, claiming that they were acting in good faith in securing the loan on the vehicle, leaving you to claim against your father's partner for your loss, whilst pursuing him themselves for any shortfall following sale of the car.

or

 

3) Seek to sign you up for a new loan, including the settlement figure for your partner's father's loan and secure the loan against the car again but in your name as the owner of the car

 

I am not advocating any unlawful act here, and to rectify the legal situation, ideally you should sign over ownership of the car to your partner's father for the duration of the loan, backdating the receipt to before the loan was taken out. This will protect him from legal action if Logbook Loans were to become aware that he did not own the car when he took out the loan.

 

Your partner's father should look into the possibility of having the court look at the "credit bargain" to see if it can be classed as extortionate, however, very few cases have been successfully won against lenders.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...