Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bigdess v First Trust


Bigdess
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Put in as much information as you think is relevant.It may not be necessary to include all your correspondance, since the FOS willask bank for this, which the have to forward pretty quickly (FOS take a dim view if they wait to deadline, like they do with us).

Enclose things like tand c where you can get them identified as penalty fees (prior to 29/05/2007).I have also forwarded the fee structure for AIB in Eire where fees are lot less than here (a lot lot less).

The First Trust cant argue that these cos6t less to process "in the south", than here since good business practice would then dictate that processing would take place there (get my drift).

I believe that the difference there is that the Irish Financial Regulator has set a maximum price on chages.M(AIb scandal a few years ago with foreign exchange and National Irish Bank Northern counterpart).

Your complaint should go along the lines of the prelim letter.

The FOS however dpo not expect us to be solicitors, and will not expect us to have the same communication skills as the banks.

We are after all, only poor hapless consumers that have been in the unfortunate position of having unlawful penalty charges taken from us by those ,whom we believed operated within the law and our best interests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

.I have also forwarded the fee structure for AIB in Eire where fees are lot less than here (a lot lot less).

The First Trust cant argue that these cos6t less to process "in the south", than here since good business practice would then dictate that processing would take place there (get my drift).

 

 

whatever you do,DO NOT rely on this if you actually reach court.....

 

 

been there,done that,didn't count for s**t.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I wouldnt rely on it as being the most important thing, but as part of the argument to make the case stronger.

I have original t and c's, with referral, letters etc being titled "penalty fees", if anyone needs a copy (sorry no scanner).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had letter from FOS, last week which now has reached adjudicator and will now go to formal investigation.

The Fos have said that they will have decision by 12.07.07.

Benn up home at lunchtime and still no correspondance from First Trust (re offer "goodwill payment" which I belive every other bank offers once a formal investigation by FOS is started).

Should I contact First Trust to say that I will be on holiday from 29/06/07, should they wish to resolve the matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok folks - got the form filled in - this is what i've put into the 'any other details' section - let me know what you think. i didnt want to go on too much cos i think they get the point but if you think i should include anything else let me know. i filled the rest of it in according to the advice in moneysavingexperts template - all pretty standard stuff so not putting it on here. here goes:

 

'I do not believe that I have been treated fairly by the First Trust Bank. At a time when I was experiencing financial difficulties I felt that they were being helpful, however, I now feel that rather than imposing a charge proportionate to their costs, they were merely allowing a situation to escalate in order to charge extravagant penalty fees. Indeed First Trust Bank, prior to 29/05/2007 referred to such fees as "penalty Fees".

I do not understand how the bank can justify charges at the high rate I was charged. First Trust have simply rejected my complaint quoting their terms and conditions. They have made no attempt to respond to my claim that their charges did not reflect the true cost to them. For example, I enclose a copy of a bank statement (dated 03/02/2000) showing a referral fee £4.50 and another (dated 19/01/2001) where the referral fee had increased to £9.00 I fail to understand how the cost to them could double in less than 1 year. When we finally moved our account in 2005 the referral fee had increased to £14 - that is an increase of 311% in 5 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what a load of cobblers that is they must think we came up the Bann in a bubble. why do ft have to be such akward as--les they know damned fine that they must supply it under the DPA. write back and ask them what system they are held under and you will report them to the information comissioner for non compliance.

regards john.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant believe it but ive a problem!! i cant find a copy of my schedule of charges and interest etc to include in my application to the FOS!!! i thought id saved it on computer or printed it out but that would be too sensible - i have everything else- any advice?? i either need to recalculate it all up to today etc or try and go back to get it to match the figure i asked first trust for originally and to be honest im gettin sick of it all - thats why im happy to let the FOS fight on my behalf!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mary

You do know what thought done ? Always a good idea to back up your data and or save on hard drive and or CD R. Does that mean your starting from scratch.

 

Bigdess

Link to post
Share on other sites

no way - not starting from scratch - i'll find it somewhere or go back and build it up again - i'll be able to do my own spreadsheet based on what i sent - see i may not be organised but i ll be able to get round it somehow!!! ps bigwisedess thanks for the support!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mary, Excellent (form info).If this is going to FOS, ye dont need the schedule of charges, as the bank has an obligation to retain all the information ythat you have sent to them vwith your "complaint"..The FOS will ask the bank to forward all this to them.

They are expected to keep things, we as consumers normally arent by the FOS.The most important thing to send them is a gopy ogf the final response letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter from FOS stating that they will be writing to AIB Group (UK) (FT) asking them to make an offer which meets the claim in full; or provide the FO with the information that he requires to reach a conclusion on the merits of your (my) claim. The letter then goes on to say that in almost all the charges complaints the FO has considered,banks have made offers to meet the claim,and it has not been necessary for the FO to issue any decisions yet.They will let me know as soon as AIB Group UK (FT) tells me whether it is prepared to settle my claim. The FO will explain the next steps when they have heard from the bank.If the FO has not heard from AIB Group (FT) within six weeks the FO will write to tell me.

 

Bigdess

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mary

 

I have one big regret that I didn't take FT to Court.By going to the FO it means that I am losing out on the 8% judicial interest,also what put me of court (despite what has been said on these boards) is judges ruling in the banks favour ie Birmingham and other courts,you keep going and keep fighting.The letter I received this morning from the FO has been encouraging.I hope Mr T gets kicked out of DPK and moved to some backwater. I mentioned that little incident in April 2000 when filling out my form to the FOs office.Here'es hoping.

 

Bigdess

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking to Ombudsman Service yesterday, who also confirmed that they are "in negotations " with AIB recommendingr refunds.Apparently they have started the ball rolling with other banks, but AIB are being "somewhat reluctant".

Link to post
Share on other sites

now theres a surprise the old FT being stubborn .lol when i first complained about my charges my manager wrote to me and stated "after perusal of your account i feel our charges are more than justified". Well after perusal of all the threads about FT and their cockups i think a refund is more than justified.lol.

regards john.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks still havent posted my form to ombudsman - still a bit worried about not putting in the schedule of charges?? what do you all think? should i just put it in anyway and let them get it from the bank? well done bigdess that sounds really encouraging - hope im as lucky!!!! when did you put your form into them????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mary

 

I put the form into FOS first week of June also contacted E K Mcgrady MP and Jeffery Donaldson MP MLA.Mc Gradys office contacted me Monday requesting the form which was sent to the FOS he also took special note of that little meeting with Mr T in April 2000.With regards to your schedule of charges I think FT have to hand these over to the FOS if they request them and any other documents concerned with your claim.To be honest If I was in your position I would go over everything again before putting your form into the FOS.Should you have to spend a day at it,it would be worth it in the long run.My objective here is to get back what is owing to me and also to get back at Mr T. I can remember a certain manager in that bank in DPK when it was AIB they moved him to Urlingford in Co Killkenny that was a long time ago.He was moved because he was very sympathectic and understanding towards his customers he treated them with respect.

 

Bigdess

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi - guys

iv'e been through the stages that bring me to referring the case to the FO - got a reply there are very busy - but fingers crossed the sort it -

 

i'm looking 3,300 back - i'll keep u posted - can i ask you do the same -

 

bigdess - your reply from the FO looks very promising - i really hope you get it all back mate-

 

how long from when you sent your latter did it take to get that reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Bigdess -

 

i have been reading your story from the start - i would say the trouble you have had with first trust is similar to alot of us - i have been called into a private room be them and scorned out for living beyond my means and basically received terrible cust service - ironically - i am glad i have stayed with them because it just means i can now claim back even more few than i wud have if i ahd moved. They got me a a bad time in my life - basically on my knee's and revelled in apllying charges - rejecting direct debits and charging me for the rejections , a lot of times the charges were higher than the direct debits.

 

this used to be the bank that likes to say YES,

 

hopefully were are the ones shouting yessssssssssssssss!!!! now

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just contacted McGradys office, case is been supported, he has been in contact with FT Belfast and DPK. Was in FT this afternoon paying Visa girl advised not to pay giro in bank cause it cost £7.00 per giro.First time this has happened.Things are looking up maybe solved by end of mouth.;)

 

Bigdess

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...