Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gerrywalt


gerrywalt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent an SAR to Abbey on 14th Feb, Had reply on 23rd Feb.

 

I would like to post the entire letter here, but me not know how.

Advice please.icon9.gif

Firstly, Abbey sent back my £10 cheque.This what they wrote.

"The transactional information you require is available on our systems and will be forwarded to you, free of charge under separate cover.

Therefor we are returning the £10 fee for this service.

With regards to any 'manual interventions' that may have been made on your account.

We consider 'manual interventions' to mean an action that is not automatic or computer-driven. Not all manual interventions are recorded, for example if a member of staff looks at a paper document relating to an account, a record is not always required. Similarly some interventions may relate to work carried by a department rather than individuals where no record of activity is kept because this is not the kind of information we need, or more importantly, that a customer would usually request. "

 

Thats it. Now how should I respond? Any ideas, or is this a situation that I can just let run out to the 40 day i gave them in my SAR letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gerry, that £10 back is the only goodwill you'll get !! Sit back and wait for the statements/microfiche and, if you haven't already, read the FAQs and Guide. The guff about manual interventions is good - it means they haven't got a clue whether there were any, so it was all automatic/computer generated, so the charges were indeed disproportionate to their costs/losses. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nick,

 

I actually had a bundle of statements in the post within days of my request/demand.

All I need to do is to calculate the the total penalties and go for it. Just one point, is the interest charged that which relates to the cost of the overdraft, or is the interest they charge when they have levied penalties which put me further unorthorised overdrawn?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Here is the situation to date.

26th March; I sent letter asking for all charges and interest charged to my account to be returned. No threat mentioned.

29th March; Received from Abbey Letter telling me that they will 'investigate' my complaint and that it will take four weeks to complete.

30th March; I respond that I am not prepared to wait for investigations and I want an answer by return whether or not they are prepared to repay my money. Should I include a threat of court action at this point? (I have not yet sent the letter)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, tell them that there is no investigation necessary. The charges are unlawful & must be repaid in full & unconditionally within 7 days or you will begin legal action to recover them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I set the 'Letter Before Action' dated 31st April. Still some days to go before going to court.

There is one question, there is more fees added since I calculated the claim sum. I know I can add on extra at a later date, but what is the proceedure? Please advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can add all charges up to the date you file a claim.

 

After that you have to fill in N244 form and it costs £35 which is non-refundable (you can't claim back off Abbey cos you changed the claim not them).

 

Good luck. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Robdblynd. And good luck to you too. Just had a letter from Abbey telling me that they will cancel my overdraft 1st July, and want all money back. They have not acknowledged my 'LBA', they just want to screw me over again.icon7.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the refunds are more than the overdraft tell them you'll consider a settlement if they refund the fees, deducting the amount of the overdraft and paying the rest to you in the form of a cheque.

 

They can legally call in your overdraft at any time but it usually is a 'sulking' move by them cos they know you're going to reclaim your money.

 

By my reckoning you can file a claim on 16th May, so go get 'em. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a service!! You are the best!!

icon5.gifNext question. I can't find the page with the Abbey Head Office, need it for the court form. Please , if you will.

 

I will make the offer to Abbey, not that I expect any kind of sensible reply. They never acknowledge my letters if they think I am getting serious.

Should the offer be by phone or letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter, everything in writing and recorded, so you've got a papertrail.

 

Head Office is Abbey National Plc, Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square,

Regent's Place, London. NW1 3AN

 

Don't forget, if you file using MCOL then send them a schedule of charges and an extended Particulars Of Claim through the post, to the Northampton address. 3 copies, one for them, one for Abbey and one will be returned to you duly stamped.

 

I prefer to fill in N1, gives you more room etc and you hand it over to court personally so you know it's on it's way.

 

Good luck and keep us up to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is it. Thursday 17th May is when I lodge the court papers.

I wish I knew how to get the experts a look over the paperwork before it goes into court, but I don't know how.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan the documents and put them on here?

 

I'm sure someone will run their eye over them for you, however, if you've used the advice on here you should be fine.

 

Are you using GaryH's 'Abuse of Process Order'

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/87766-abbey-abuse-orders-keeping.html

 

it's brilliant and has worked for several people. Basically it asks the judge to strike Abbey's case cos they've never actually defended a case in court.

 

Have a read & see what you think.

 

You could do what I did and save it for the AQ but with so many judges doing away with the AQ it's a bit of a risk.

 

Good luck, you'll be fine. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,Robd,

Thanks for the help to date. Just one more numpty question. To whom, do I send the scans?

As for the Abuse of Process Order, do I send it in with my summons, or hold on for later on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gerry,

Been thinking about this, if you've filled in the particulars of claim using the templates and advice from the site you should be fine.

 

Given that the AQ is being dispensed with by many judges you might be advised to use the extended POC instead of the basic one.

 

If you PM me with your email address I'll send you a copy and you can see whether you think it's relevant.

 

The abuse of process is great but with no AQ it's not gonna get an airing unless you do what I did, after filing the AQ cos they sent it I got a letter saying it had been dispensed with, so I wrote directly to the judge and asked him to consider it in the interests of saving the courts time.

 

If you want to send the scans directly to me I'll have a look for you, I'll PM my address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Got 'em, I have now Judgement for Claiment (in default) notice. Abbey did not defend, nor acknowledge receipt of claim form. I suppose this a means of further dragging out the process. They can always say they did not receive the forms, so they can petition to have the Judgement set aside. If that happens, what would be my next step?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gerry

 

Have a look at the following thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/99851-help-witness-statement-exhibit.html

 

This is exactly what happened to them and Abbey requested for it to be set aside, stating they didnt receive the paperwork blah blah blah.

 

Abbey have until this monday to acknowledge my claim, so will be interesting to see if they do or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got my Judgement by Default from the court office. Abbey did not acknowledge receipt of the forms nor post a defence. So I can assume they have lost. But I suppose that I must go thro' the rigmarole of waiting for them to apply to have the Judgement set aside, or whatever process is is legal. I would love to have bailiffs with me to march into my branch and threaten to remove goods to the value of my claim!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...