Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
    • Thank you I cannot sleep. CRS is the company 
    • They wont take you to court. I'm not sure what they'll do about the letters and if they will or wont send you the letters from their retail prevention company, but you can ignore those letters. You'll be just fine don't worry.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fendy v NatWest - 16K - **FINALLY WON**


fendyweather
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I was wondering, once they get served with the court thingy can they still come back and offer me my charges and do I have to accept

or can I take it all the way to court now for the 15.7K.

 

Yes you can. But equally you can decide to accept or refuse any future offer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send 2 copies of your schedule of charges, clearly marked with your claim no. + a brief covering letter asking for them to be filed with your claim to:

 

The Court Manager,

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

Yours sincerely,

 

Wait until you receive the Notice of Acknowledgement (not the Notice of Issue) from the court and then send a copy to the bank’s solicitors, since they are the ones who will now be dealing with your claim

 

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

It is normally the claimant who has to organise telephone conferences, but since you are not represented, it will be Cobbetts responsibility (CPR practice Direction 23)

 

Write to them referring to the order and ask them what arrangements they are making. Copy to the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual they're using their bullying tactics. They just can't help themselves.

 

Quote Civil Procedure Rule 19.6 to them:

 

Representative parties with same interest

 

19.6 (1)Where more than one person has the same interest in a claim –

(a)the claim may be begun; or

(b)the court may order that the claim be continued,

 

by or against one or more of the persons who have the same interest as representatives of any other persons who have that interest.

 

(2)The court may direct that a person may not act as a representative.

 

(3)Any party may apply to the court for an order under paragraph (2).

 

(4)Unless the court otherwise directs any judgment or order given in a claim in which a party is acting as a representative under this rule –

(a)is binding on all persons represented in the claim; but

(b)may only be enforced by or against a person who is not a party to the claim with the permission of the court.

 

(5)This rule does not apply to a claim to which rule 19.7 applies.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they want to play silly buggers, so can you:

 

Dear Sir,

 

Claim No: XXXX

 

I write in reply to your letter of xx/xx/xx, requesting that my husband join me as party to the above claim.

 

I am perfectly willing to accede to your request, since my husband is fully aware and is in full agreement of the claim. I would be happy to make an application to amend my claim.

 

However since this is not required, as stated in Civil Procedure Rule 19.6, but is solely at your request, I think it entirely reasonable that the cost of the application, together with the associated administrative costs, is born by yourselves.

 

I therefore look forward to receiving a cheque for £35, plus £10 administration.

 

In the meantime my claim will proceed as filed.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I am writing to respectfully request that the court strike out the defence as a complete abuse of the court process on the basis that the defendant has settled all previous claims of this nature

In agreeing to settle with me in writing, then withdrawing this offer at the last possible moment, I feel that the defendant is merely using every opportunity of the court process as delaying tactics and that the defendant has no intention of defending my claim at a full hearing.

 

 

Suggested edit, otherwise fine.

Don't forget that the telephone hearing is only for directions, nothing will actually be decided tomorrow.

 

There's this for reference:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/20752-kazzaw-lloyds-asset-card.html#post467620

 

Oh, and of course, all bets are off now. Only the full amount will do and then apply for wasted costs:

Wasted Costs order

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...