Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Draft letter…. Please find attached response from Mercedes Croydon, along with pictures showing the root cause as water ingress over time. These pictures and the report indicate that the problem is pre-existing. Therefore, I expect Doves to take responsibility for the costs incurred, as per the Consumer Rights Act 2015 “should a fault appear outside of 6 months, it's for the consumer to prove the fault was present at time of sale”  I called Doves seeking advice regarding the Mercedes I purchased on the 29th September 2023. On the 12th May 2024, the car lost contact with the keys, so I followed the warranty process and called the AA using my RAMP reference number. The AA attended but couldn't resolve the issue and diagnosed it as an electrical fault. Consequently, the car was recovered to Mercedes on the 16th of May. I chose Mercedes for their expertise and specialized diagnostic software that many garages wouldn’t have, hoping for a swift resolution. After many days at Mercedes in Croydon, the fault was identified as water ingress from the front windscreen, which turns out, is not original. The windscreen has a date stamp of 2019, even though the car was registered in 2018. Therefore this clearly occurred some 3 years before I purchased the car and has been slowly deteriorating since the incorrect workmanship of the windscreen. This will also explain why the front trim around the window showed signs of damage when I purchased the car. I had asked for the trim to be replaced due to its noticeable damage, but Jack informed me that it would be too costly, so we negotiated this into the sale price. It seems this damage was caused by the windscreen being replaced.  The car is now ready to be collected as works are complete and I expect the costs to be covered between yourself and would appreciate a swift response to resolve this.
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
    • Desperation. They must think people have forgotten what Johnson was like as PM. Tories turn to Boris to combat Farage threat WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK Former PM signs letters to wavering voters amid warning Labour could be in power for a generation if support goes to Reform  
    • I hope Labour keeps its word about investigating these contracts. Boss of US firm given £4bn in UK Covid contracts accused of squandering millions on jets and properties | Coronavirus | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Rishi Sunak’s team helped fast-track deal with firm founded by Charles Huang, who says contracts generated $2bn profit  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

3 Mobile Harrassment for a closed account


Sev
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

4 years ago I had an account with 3 mobile. It was painfull and I eventually decided to terminate all agreements and settle in full.

 

Now I have recieved a letter from a debt collection agency calling for an outstanding sum of £26.49 to be paid.

 

I asked then to send me proof, and they said I would have to turn to 3 for this. Also I could not sue them.

 

I have rung 3 and they told me that they only have records going back 12 months, and that previous to this they have no records.

 

What can I do? I asked for proof of my statements but they have told me that this is not possible.

 

Legally what can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not an expert but this sounds like a bit of a bad joke to me...

What are they going to do...take you to court?

 

I can imagine it now...

'Yes you honour, I promise you we are telling the truth but we cannot prove it and have no records...'

 

Personally I would probably simply refuse to pay!

But I would wait for more professional advice than mine...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sev, I understand the debt collector must send you a copy of their contract with 3 (as proof 3 have passed the 'debt' onto them), upon request. They cannot then demand payment until you have a copy of this. You can then dispute it - they also cannot demand payment whilst it is in dispute. That is the first step I would take.

******************

HSBC £4,528

Began process with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on 5/7/06

Recieved payment on 21/4/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply write to the debt collector stating that you have asked their client (3UK) to provide proof that the bebt exists, however they have been unable to do so.

 

You are writing to them as a courtesy only, to advise you reject 3's claim until such proof is provided, additionally you will not be entrering into further correspondence with third parties in this matter.

 

That should tidy up the first bit, but you'll then need to request your credit file from a CRA to see if adverse data has been recorded against your identity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've sent the following letters to H3G. Feel free to ammend for your own needs. I've copied in quite a few people you may find helpfull!

 

 

 

Mr Bob Fuller CEO

Hutchison 3G UK Limited,

Hutchison House,

Albion Wharf,

5 Hester Road,

Battersea

SW11 4AN.

 

Monday 19th March 2007

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: 9201xxxxxx

 

Dear Mr Fuller,

 

I once took out a contract with Hutchinson 3G UK in the summer of 2004. The contract was for 12 months and was for a combined offer of 500 minutes anytime and for a 3 as you go plan and handset.

 

One year later, I terminated that contract on the grounds of abysmal customer service and painfull billing errors. To this day I have always tried to forget the awful customer service and the terrible ‘couldn’t care less’ attitude of your call centre staff.

In fact, the weight off my shoulders when the contract was finally over was beyond compare.

 

As you can imagine, I was less than pleased when I received a letter of formal demand from the debt collection agency Buchananclark+Wells stating that they had been instructed by Hutchinson 3G to recover the outstanding sum of £26.49 for an overdue debt.

 

Their letter of 8th February 2007 states:

“Our client has informed us that they are unaware of any legitimate reason for non payment of their account and although they would prefer an amicable settlement, will not hesitate to comment Legal Proceedings in necessary”

 

On telephoning (DCA), on the first occasion I was told that it was I that would have to prove that there was no outstanding debt, and that until such time they would pursue regardless.

 

On the 17th February I received a letter from Hutchinson 3G UK, a statement of account for a 3toGo price plan. This was showing a credit of £3.91.

 

I rung the customer services number on the statement, and was told by the call centre operative that the £26.49 was showing as outstanding and that my 3 as you go account had been changed to a 3toGo.

 

I asked whether he could give me the date of the outstanding transaction, he replied that he did not have details on accounts passed 12 months.

 

I then reminded him of the Data Protection Act 1998, stating that information must be held for six years. He proceeded to tell me that they did not hold records past 12 months, and that as Hutchinson 3G do not have call centres in the UK, were not subject to UK Law!

 

On the 20th February 2007, I received another letter from the DCA. A final notice, and now threatening legal proceedings to recover the principal lump sum and the interest and costs of such action.

 

Enclosed is a letter that I have sent them disputing this sum.

 

I would like therefore to ask the following:

 

1) Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 DPA subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local 3 Branch.

 

Should you, as your call centre operative states, only hold data for 12 months then I feel that a complaint to the Information Commissioner is in order and also will begin a County Court action under the Data Protection Act.

 

2) Why in 2004 was my account not terminated as asked.

Why when all outstanding amounts were settled, and confirmed as settled, am I still now owing £26.49 ?

 

3) Why have you waited 3 years (how very ironic) in order for you to realise that I apparently owe you money (which I strongly dispute), and if so, why was a statement of request not sent to me by Hutchinson 3G UK in the first instance, as opposed to having to hear first from a debt collection agency?

 

4) If I still have any accounts showing as open – please, close them immediately as they should have been in 2004. There is no excuse for the action of not having done so. Please be clear – I wish absolutely nothing to do with you.

 

5) I am led to understand that you may have filed a default to the credit referencing agencies. I will of course request a copy of my credit record. If it shows that you or Buchananclark+Wells have indeed filed a default against me, I will seek further action.

 

I feel that were this debt genuine, and given the struggle I had in ridding myself of your contract, you would have been more than persisitent in the recovery of this sum.

 

In behaving in this manner, I feel that terminating my contract with you, which I may hasten to add, was like pulling teeth, was a totally justified action in 2004.

 

I find the morality and ethic of not employing UK call centre staff, but taking the UK public’s money in order to maximise your profits absolutely disgusting. I have written to my MP in order to see if this can be highlighted in the House of Commons.

 

I have forwarded a copy also to your regulatory bodies Otelo and ICSTIS. I do not have any faith in your customer complaints department.

I look forward to a resolution of this matter and await your reply.

 

 

 

 

Sev

 

 

 

Enc. Cheque for the Sum of £10 number xxxxxx

 

Letter from Buchananclark+wells 8th February 2007

Letter from Buchananclark+wells 20th February 2007

Copy of 3 statement for 3toGo account 14 February 2007

 

cc. Debt collection agency

Otelo

ICTIS

Office of Fair Trading

BBC Watchdog

Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir or Madam,

I would like to inform you that I dispute the debt of £26.49 to Hutchinson 3G UK.

Enclosed you will find a letter to them and to their regulatory bodies and the Office of Fair Trading.

Until proof has been shown that I owed Hutchinson 3G UK the sum of £26.49, I refuse to acknowledge ANY debt to your company, despite what was said to me by one of your customer support staff, that it is I who must prove the debt to you. Therefore I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 Cheque in payment of the statutory fee, Serial Number 300004.

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that qualifies you to pursue this debt.

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not.

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

As far as I am concerned, I consider this alleged debt to be in dispute.

I await your correspondence.

Yours Sincerely

Name Here

Enc. Cheque for the sum of £1 – cheque Number xxxxx

Letter to Hutchinson 3G UK

cc. Buchananclark+wells

Otelo

ICTIS

Office of Fair Trading

BBC Watchdog

Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Bob Fuller (3's CEO)

Hutchison 3G UK Limited,

Hutchison House,

Albion Wharf,

5 Hester Road,

Battersea

SW11 4AN.

executive.office@three.co.uk

Otelo

Office of the Telecommunications Ombudsman – the independent provider of our dispute resolution process.

Otelo

PO Box 730

Warrington,

WA4 6WU

E-mail: enquiries@otelo.org.uk

Tel: 0845 050 1614

ICSTIS

The Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services regulates the content and promotion of premium-rate services.

ICSTIS

Clove Building

4 Maguire Street

London

SE1 2NQ

E-mail: secretariat@icstis.org.uk

Tel: 020 7940 7474

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, you've gone off with a blunderbuss and sprayed everyone - Bob Fuller deson't deal with day to day consumer business, and sending him a SAR is pointless, far better sending this to the Data Controller (details from the ICO website) with your fee.

 

If you'd read the 'sticky' notice in this forum about the CCA, you'll notice is does not affect Mobile Phone contracts, and to attempt to claim this confirms to them there is no understanding of how it all works. Similarly, you mention they 'have to keep records for 6 years'. Where did you get this from? The only reference to 6 years is that CRA's assert this is a "reasonable time" to hold information on your record, it is not enshrined in any document or law. It would be sensible for firms to hang on to data for as long as possible, but don't try to tell them what their rules should be, it does you no favours and takes much of the impact away from an otherwise competent correspondence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buzby, Thanks, I haven't posted any of this lot yet.

 

Ok, so now I'm confused. I haven't managed to get any joy from the DCA or from 3's customer services.

 

What about a polite notice to the executive office to start with?

 

I'm running around chasing my tail here.

 

So what do I request from the ICO? if 3 say that they don't have any proof of the debt, it just shows as outstanding then the ICO won't have the information I need will they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well.... in itself the letter is great, (with the exceptions I noted earlier) and a direct appeal can be useful if they're not swamped (!). They are interested in customer experience, so they may try to make amends, so comments like 'I wouldn't wipe my bum with your newsletters again', kinda make a friendly restitution difficult. :)

 

Take it in stages, send this direct to 3UK, if no satisfaction get your SAR and look for charges that are wrong and ask for a refund along with your SAR fee), if they don't play ball - THEN do the OFTEL, and OTELLO if you want to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, so perhaps rewrite the letter minus the SAR part, and perhaps a little more cordial, and should it come to it, send fee to the ICO.

 

It's not the charges - it's the fact that I actually settled in full. The 3 as you go account was never used, but mysteriously at contract termination time a fee of £85 appeared for calls made - even though i'd never taken the phone or the sim out of the wrapper!

 

I paid them just to draw a line under it all.

 

I wish i'd kept it now, but last year I shredded the 'sorry to lose you' letter!

 

This lot are a real bunch of pratts!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I ammend request 1 to read the following:

 

"1) Proof of Debt.

I would kindly ask that you supply me with proof of this outstanding sum, I am sure that were you to look thoroughly through your records, you will see that I have in fact paid all accounts in full.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return.If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

I would also ask for written confirmation that once this confusion has been resolved, all points have been settled, just incase any confusion should arise in the future"

 

I'll stick to my original letter to the DCA,as I don't think this is unreasonable.

 

Also do you think 14 or 28 days to provide such proof?

When you say 3UK, I take it you mean the London Address? - I'm sorry but I really have no faith whatsoever in their call centre staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks good. Make it 28 days to fully comply, as that show's you're being both realistic and reasonable. 3UK, the management are in Herts and Glasgow, with the main admin at their St Vincent Street address in Glasgow, let me know if you need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Buzby, i'll do that.

 

If you could give me the correct address that would be really good.

 

Would it be worth sending an electronic copy to the exec. office email above, or not bother at this stage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure,

 

Hutchison 3G UK,

123 St Vincent Street,

Glasgow. G2 5EA.

 

Tel: 08707 330 295

Fax: 0141 204 8773 (this is not the call centre)

 

As for emailing the Exec Office, sure - go for broke, it won't cost you anything and might speed things up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Buzby, i just thought it's odd that they should list a regulator who looks after premium rate numbers, and they don't use premium rate numbers... or perhaps i'm missing something.

 

Anyway, I as yet have heard nothing back from H3G, however I have recieved a letter from Buchananclark+Wells, reading as follws:

 

"Dear Sev,

 

I write with regards to your recent communication concerning the above account.

 

I would advise that we do not hold copy Credit Agreements at this office, as we are not the creditor. Under the circumstances your postal order for £1.00 is returned herewith.

 

However, I would advise that I have placed this account on hold and have asked my client to forward documents to you directly.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact us on 08707001551 should you require any further assistance. You can also e-mail on general@bcwgroup.com

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

David Smith

Administration department

bcwgroup plc"

 

 

I've got another 10 days before the 28 day deadline that H3G had expires.

My next thoughts are if I haven't heard anything, to forward a copy of all correspondence to the OFT.

 

The fact is, that I know this account is dead and buried - I spent so much effort trying to get this lot to accept that I really didn't want their services anymore that it's scarred into my memory for eternity!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, i see your point!

 

Right got a letter from H3G on the weekend, it didn't answer any of the questions raised in my initial letter, only stating that it was an outstanding amount calculated when the account was closed.

 

it reads as follows:

"we tried to call today on your mobile and landline, but unfortunately, you weren't available when I called.

 

You still have an outstanding current balance of £26.49 to date which you are liable for this payment for august and september 2004 bills and after your final bill was recalculated after your account was closed. Your account is in collections at the present time and you can make the above payments by giro slip (found on the bottom of your bills), debit/credit card or by cheque. Remember to put your account number and mobile number on the back of the cheque so our payments department can process your cheque more efficiently.

 

I hope that this clarifies matters for you."

 

The thing that really annoyed me was that his first line stated that he'd called my home and mobile but had had no reply. He certainly didn't call my home, nor did he call my mobile - unless of course he used the non existant 3 phone number!

 

I think i'll just file a complaint to trading standards and BBC watchdog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's little point 'filing' a complaint with either. One is a broadcaster and will do nothing unless they spot a trend they can create a story around. TS only pursue organizations they have the legal powers for absolute errors (like Weights & Measures), anything else they make soothing noises but you're on your own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...