Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I've moved your thread to the Residential and Commercial lettings forum. People should be along to advise later. HB
    • Ah I never even considered it, odd f9r me because im Tech savvy. Had a look and sure enough its all there in my google timeline. Perfect. 
    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is £100 Charge per o/d excessive/normal?


harvest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question. Having read many threads on this website and all of the recent major media coverage I noticed the following:

 

Most people are talking about charges of £30, £39 in O/D fees.

 

Having gone through my statements for the last 6 years my charges were on average

 

£100 'Excess O/D Fee' (even though I hadn't anywhere near exceeded my agreed O/D limit) every month plus another £30 charge each time titled 'Overdraft Fee' on the statement.

 

Is this par for the course or does it strengthen my case? In once instance I had a charge for £122 'Excess O/D Fee' and £30 'Overdraft Fee' on the same day.

 

Grateful for any info.

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know RTS. A bit frightening really that I never noticed these charges were adding up to so much money.

 

What annoys me is that I hadn't exceeded my ovedraft limit at all when these charges were first applied.

 

These charges just appeared out of nowhere. Inevitably, as the charges built up each month my O/D eventually did exceed its limit creating a further raft of higher charges.

 

The bank won't even enter into a discussion about why an excess O/D fee was ever applied so I have no option but to pursue a claim.

 

I would love someone on here to be the first to set a case precedent by forcing one of the banks into a court to defend a claim. It will happen sooner or later I think.

 

The legal system will not be able to cope with the sheer number of claims if this and other websites are anything to go by. I reckon a senior legal figure will want to compell a full defence (by one of the banks) and make a decision that sorts this all out one way or the other.

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to hope that the OFT or some body will tell the banks to repay any substantiated charges claimed on demand a bit like some are doing with mortgage exit fees. (or am I just dreaming).

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too right Half Ax I.

 

I'm sure it will happen eventually.

 

It's nice to think that everyoneon here, pursuing claims, are part of a vanguard to get things changed. Your knights helmet in your avatar will come in handy I reckon!

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bettyswollox and Madhouse. Yes, I'll be claiming these back. Looks like FD are one of the highest chargers then.

 

As soon as I've had my first reply to LBA, or 14 days has elapsed, I'll put a thread up harvest v FD with progress reports.

 

It'll be interesting to see if they have any new tactics as the number of claims gathers pace.

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

£149 total in one month? I've had this quite a few times as well.

 

I have seen on a number of my statements that they have credited some charges back to me. It seems FD have a policy of not charging you more than the £149 in any single month, bless them.

 

They're all heart, aren't they?

 

And yes, I am after them for my money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bopomofo - we should have a competition on here for who has had the highest single charge applied to their account in a single hit.

 

At the moment I think you're top of the league. £149, in one month? Imagine a bank, if a case ever gets to the stage where they turn up in court (unlikely I know), trying to justify that figure on the grounds that it's not punative or a penalty but a 'service charge'. They'd be laughed out of court (surely?)

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think I've made a balls up.

 

When I produced my charges I included the following as charges I was reclaiming

 

'Excess Overdraft Fees'

'Overdraft Fees'

'Charge Renewal Fees'

 

Having just looked at other threads and relooked at FAQs and guidance I've just had a horrible feeling that you can't charge overdraft 'fees' per se, just Excess overdraft fees?

 

These O/D fees were not something I agreed to as regular service charges. I agreed a one off O/D arrangement fee.

 

Have I F***ed up?

 

Be grateful for advice.

 

Thanks

 

harvest

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OD fee is charged when you exceed your limit. The Excess OD fee is charged on each 'unauthorised' transcation. Oddly, these unauthorised transactions include debit card transactions, which they... ummmm.... authorised.

 

Anyway, you are ok for OD fee and excess OD fee. The renewal fee ( I don't have this) sounds like a charge you pay for the overdraft facility itself, in which case it is a fee for a service rather than a penalty fee.

 

Claim the OD and excess OD fee.

 

[At least that is what I'm doing based on other advice in this forum]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bopomofo - really appreciated.

 

I just had one of those horrible / nagging feelings that I'd ballsed up the basics and FD/HSBC would pounce on my obvious schoolboy errors to put my claim at the back of the queue or worse write a sarcastic letter telling me I'm an idiot or something (got enough people to do that already without FD/HSBC jumping on the bandwagon).

 

Cheers again. Good luck with your claim Bopo

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

...but as I said, I think the renewal fees are a fee for a service, so you can't claim those. I'm doing the totting up as we speak, and I will keep a couple of separate totals I think.

 

We're only a few days apart, it seems, so it will be good to keep comparing notes.

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're right Bopo about the renewal fee. I've checked on the FD website...seems even though they didn't tell me about it there is an annual thirty quid charge for having an O/D over £500.00

 

As you say, our claims are only a few days apart so I'll keep this up to date and check your thread regularly for updates.

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, forgot. One other thing....

 

This may be new I don't know but:

 

Going through my statements I found regular £2.50 charges for 'text message banking'. I've never used FD Text Message banking, never signed up for it and don't even know what it is. Can anyone shed light?

 

Has anyone else claimed back Text Message Banking charges?

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bookmark.

 

I asked FD about this and they confirmed that I'd never even had the free period of Text Message banking because you had to sign-up or ask for that when it first came out - even when it was free. I certainly never requested it at any time.

 

It's not a huge amount but works out about £30 a year.

 

Could complicate my claim so I've left them out

Claim against First Direct - WON - 29th March 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...