Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off all you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
    • Desperation. They must think people have forgotten what Johnson was like as PM. Tories turn to Boris to combat Farage threat WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK Former PM signs letters to wavering voters amid warning Labour could be in power for a generation if support goes to Reform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HELP please pcworld laptops


janey2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5770 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my hubby brought me a ADVENT laptop from (pcworld) yeik 7mths ago. On the day of buying it we returned it because it would not charge up. " mths later the new one 90% of the time startsup just before it finishes loading windows it turn off & takes about 30 more reboots to get it going. I phone tech did a system restore then collected to repair it. All they did was change the plug. Still it turns itself off & on so we return it & ask of a refund only to be told no we the store will repair it guess what still turns it self off and on. After quoting the Trading Standards act to them they still wont give me a full refund and again its of the the work shop . HELP PLEASE .......its only 7moths old

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you arent entitled to a full refund in law.

 

This sounds almost with certainty one of two things:

 

- Overheating - which is notoriously difficult to troubleshoot, and probably more due to ventilation than any fault per se.

 

- Spyware/adware on the system, or at least some kind of software fault, which almost certainly isn't covered under your warranty....

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not any software because they returned it to manufactors setting. also we brought a laptop tiltting table deck.

 

They have phone and said that it still keeps turn off they cant find a problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

So there is nothing at all on the laptop that was not there when it was purchased?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Shed has said pretty much what I was going to say.

 

If it's not the software and is definitely a fault with the laptop, you will be covered by the Sale of Goods Act.

 

Basically you have to give them a reasonable opportunity to repair if that's what they intend to do - once they have had a reasonable chance to put the fault right and failed, you can ask for rescission of the contract.

 

This isn't a full refund. It's a partial refund with a deduction to allow for the seven months' use you have had from the laptop.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my hubby brought me a ADVENT laptop from (pcworld) yeik 7mths ago. On the day of buying it we returned it because it would not charge up. " mths later the new one 90% of the time startsup just before it finishes loading windows it turn off & takes about 30 more reboots to get it going. I phone tech did a system restore then collected to repair it. All they did was change the plug. Still it turns itself off & on so we return it & ask of a refund only to be told no we the store will repair it guess what still turns it self off and on. After quoting the Trading Standards act to them they still wont give me a full refund and again its of the the work shop . HELP PLEASE .......its only 7moths old

 

As this was a reoccuring problem 1st reported shortly after purchase & within the 6 months limitation on reverse liablity you are entitled to a full refund.....All that has happened through time is that PCW have not corrected the fault which existed from the outset causin the delay.......In view of this they can't then negate their responsibilties under the SOGA. However this may not be the case if each of the problems where different or caused by add on software you installed

 

If my car developes a fault just before the warranty expires.......the garage repair it.......then the same fault appears after the warranty has expired thay can't then tell me they have no legal obligation to again repair it FOC & if the purchase was less than 6 months ago I can demand a full refund or another vehicle of at least equivilent value without proving fault..It's upto the dealer to prove that no fault existed at time of purchase

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the six months gives a reversed burden of proof, but no right to a full refund once the original "reasonable time" under the SoGA has elapsed.

 

It does not mean you can claim a full refund at any point within those six months. All it does is put the burden of proof on the trader to prove the goods are not faulty, rather than on the consumer to prove they are.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This reversal of the usual burden of proof only applies when the consumer is seeking a repair or replacement or a refund. After the first six months the onus of proof is again on the consumer. Even if the dealer attempted to reduce the financial compensation they wouldn't get away with it certainly not on a product that developed problems within a few weeks of purchase. The fact that the 6 months has passed is not due to the customer its down to the failure of the dealer to carry out a satisfactory repair from the outset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She would need to rescind the contract and rescission itself is not a full refund; the law takes into account any use that the consumer will have had from the item.

 

It's possible that a judge will be sympathetic and decide to award a full refund if the consumer can put together a good argument that they have not been able to use it properly as it has been faulty since the outset, but if you're sticking entirely to the letter of the law rescission must include a reduction to allow for wear and tear.

 

The "six month" rule does not mean that if the item is returned faulty at any time during the first six months you are automatically entitled to a full refund.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually according to the op after returning it the new item worked for " months - which I guess was meant to be 2 months.

 

 

In court you may or may not get the full value back, as Rosie says it will mainly depend on the judge as there has been some useage of the product. However the chances of the DSG letting the matter get that far are minimal so a full refund could probably be expected as an out of court settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joncris, if you read what I said, I did explain that if the consumer can demonstrate that the item has been faulty from the outset the judge may well be sympathetic to that and award a full refund. It would be ultimately down to the judge to decide what, if any, benefit the consumer had enjoyed from the product.

 

However, as you seemed to be under the impression that if something becomes faulty within the first six months and a repair fails that you can automatically get a full refund, this is incorrect and I was simply pointing this out.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

one of my friends was facing the same problem.. recently he bought one from checkcost.co.uk/laptops/c/4220/

 

he says its really awesome.. I got one from ebuyer as I have seen they have reasonable price compared to other store listed over there.

 

So its better to compare and have a deal !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of quoting the sale of goods act why don't you just look at pcw returns and replacement policy.

 

If your PC/laptop goes wrong in the first 12 months that PCW (i assume pcw could be the law) states they have to repair it in reasonable time (28 days) otherwise they will give you a replacement laptop. This 28 days starts from first contact with the call centre or store and before people say that the problem was reported 6 months ago that sounded like a completly different problem.

 

so find out when you first called, make sure you have a record of this i.e. a phone bill or ask for your call notes from the call centre and if it has been more than 28 days with no gaps of more than 7 days from when you recieved the laptop back from "repair" and you calling in again ask for your laptop to written off, and you will then recieve vouchers to buy and equivalent machine (but hopefully one that works)

 

The call centre is actually good if you manage to get through to someone who knows what they are doing and knows the policys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...