Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So do I gather that you are out of pocket to the tune of £2500 which is part of the purchase price and a further £1800 in respect of the warranty? The £2500 was used to buy the car. Did warranties200 per year or did they pay big motoring world directly?
    • Farage has agreed to be interviewed by Nick Robinson on Panorama. 7pm this Friday, BBC1. He didn't do very well last time he was questioned on specific policies.
    • I did what I told my husband not to do…and I telephoned them. All credit where it’s due, the lady on the phone was very helpful. I’m not gonna lie I broke down on the phone as this has been incredibly stressful. Perhaps that helped, but I would like to think they just realised they sold us a faulty car.    so we only bought one extended warranty and that was with Nissan. The car salesman gave us the hard sell and we fell for 100%! Part of the sell was if there was ever a problem then we would only ever take the car to a Nissan garage. There was a problem after a few days and we were instructed to go to a third party grange! We contacted Nissan on the phone and they said they would put on a complaint for us so maybe that helped too.    we just want to try and get all of our spend back now. The deposit, money for the finance and money for the extended warranty. I reload we will probably have to pay costs but I guess we can’t argue with that. We just need a new car!!!! Aaarrgghhhh!    thanks so much for your help once again. 
    • Right I see I didn't realise it had to be laid out like that. I have had another go, sorry I'm really struggling here! 1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. The claimant has thus far been unable to produce any evidence that the alleged debt has been legally assigned to them. Nor have they been able to provide evidence that notice of assignment was given to the defendant on the dates stated in the particulars of their claim. 3. The claimant has given no details as to the breakdown of their claim or what dates it relates to. As a result the defendant is unable to specifically defend the claim until the claimant can show how the amount has been reached. In the claimants particulars of claim, the claimant openly admits that they have a copy of the agreement and its terms and conditions but have failed to provide these to the defendant. Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a  written agreement: (1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s)  should be available at  the hearing. With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:- a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed ; c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 5. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HELP please pcworld laptops


janey2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my hubby brought me a ADVENT laptop from (pcworld) yeik 7mths ago. On the day of buying it we returned it because it would not charge up. " mths later the new one 90% of the time startsup just before it finishes loading windows it turn off & takes about 30 more reboots to get it going. I phone tech did a system restore then collected to repair it. All they did was change the plug. Still it turns itself off & on so we return it & ask of a refund only to be told no we the store will repair it guess what still turns it self off and on. After quoting the Trading Standards act to them they still wont give me a full refund and again its of the the work shop . HELP PLEASE .......its only 7moths old

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you arent entitled to a full refund in law.

 

This sounds almost with certainty one of two things:

 

- Overheating - which is notoriously difficult to troubleshoot, and probably more due to ventilation than any fault per se.

 

- Spyware/adware on the system, or at least some kind of software fault, which almost certainly isn't covered under your warranty....

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not any software because they returned it to manufactors setting. also we brought a laptop tiltting table deck.

 

They have phone and said that it still keeps turn off they cant find a problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

So there is nothing at all on the laptop that was not there when it was purchased?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Shed has said pretty much what I was going to say.

 

If it's not the software and is definitely a fault with the laptop, you will be covered by the Sale of Goods Act.

 

Basically you have to give them a reasonable opportunity to repair if that's what they intend to do - once they have had a reasonable chance to put the fault right and failed, you can ask for rescission of the contract.

 

This isn't a full refund. It's a partial refund with a deduction to allow for the seven months' use you have had from the laptop.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my hubby brought me a ADVENT laptop from (pcworld) yeik 7mths ago. On the day of buying it we returned it because it would not charge up. " mths later the new one 90% of the time startsup just before it finishes loading windows it turn off & takes about 30 more reboots to get it going. I phone tech did a system restore then collected to repair it. All they did was change the plug. Still it turns itself off & on so we return it & ask of a refund only to be told no we the store will repair it guess what still turns it self off and on. After quoting the Trading Standards act to them they still wont give me a full refund and again its of the the work shop . HELP PLEASE .......its only 7moths old

 

As this was a reoccuring problem 1st reported shortly after purchase & within the 6 months limitation on reverse liablity you are entitled to a full refund.....All that has happened through time is that PCW have not corrected the fault which existed from the outset causin the delay.......In view of this they can't then negate their responsibilties under the SOGA. However this may not be the case if each of the problems where different or caused by add on software you installed

 

If my car developes a fault just before the warranty expires.......the garage repair it.......then the same fault appears after the warranty has expired thay can't then tell me they have no legal obligation to again repair it FOC & if the purchase was less than 6 months ago I can demand a full refund or another vehicle of at least equivilent value without proving fault..It's upto the dealer to prove that no fault existed at time of purchase

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the six months gives a reversed burden of proof, but no right to a full refund once the original "reasonable time" under the SoGA has elapsed.

 

It does not mean you can claim a full refund at any point within those six months. All it does is put the burden of proof on the trader to prove the goods are not faulty, rather than on the consumer to prove they are.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This reversal of the usual burden of proof only applies when the consumer is seeking a repair or replacement or a refund. After the first six months the onus of proof is again on the consumer. Even if the dealer attempted to reduce the financial compensation they wouldn't get away with it certainly not on a product that developed problems within a few weeks of purchase. The fact that the 6 months has passed is not due to the customer its down to the failure of the dealer to carry out a satisfactory repair from the outset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She would need to rescind the contract and rescission itself is not a full refund; the law takes into account any use that the consumer will have had from the item.

 

It's possible that a judge will be sympathetic and decide to award a full refund if the consumer can put together a good argument that they have not been able to use it properly as it has been faulty since the outset, but if you're sticking entirely to the letter of the law rescission must include a reduction to allow for wear and tear.

 

The "six month" rule does not mean that if the item is returned faulty at any time during the first six months you are automatically entitled to a full refund.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually according to the op after returning it the new item worked for " months - which I guess was meant to be 2 months.

 

 

In court you may or may not get the full value back, as Rosie says it will mainly depend on the judge as there has been some useage of the product. However the chances of the DSG letting the matter get that far are minimal so a full refund could probably be expected as an out of court settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joncris, if you read what I said, I did explain that if the consumer can demonstrate that the item has been faulty from the outset the judge may well be sympathetic to that and award a full refund. It would be ultimately down to the judge to decide what, if any, benefit the consumer had enjoyed from the product.

 

However, as you seemed to be under the impression that if something becomes faulty within the first six months and a repair fails that you can automatically get a full refund, this is incorrect and I was simply pointing this out.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

one of my friends was facing the same problem.. recently he bought one from checkcost.co.uk/laptops/c/4220/

 

he says its really awesome.. I got one from ebuyer as I have seen they have reasonable price compared to other store listed over there.

 

So its better to compare and have a deal !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of quoting the sale of goods act why don't you just look at pcw returns and replacement policy.

 

If your PC/laptop goes wrong in the first 12 months that PCW (i assume pcw could be the law) states they have to repair it in reasonable time (28 days) otherwise they will give you a replacement laptop. This 28 days starts from first contact with the call centre or store and before people say that the problem was reported 6 months ago that sounded like a completly different problem.

 

so find out when you first called, make sure you have a record of this i.e. a phone bill or ask for your call notes from the call centre and if it has been more than 28 days with no gaps of more than 7 days from when you recieved the laptop back from "repair" and you calling in again ask for your laptop to written off, and you will then recieve vouchers to buy and equivalent machine (but hopefully one that works)

 

The call centre is actually good if you manage to get through to someone who knows what they are doing and knows the policys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...