Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Don't give them your e-mail address, don't give them your telephone number and don't fill in their forms. They send these things to pretend they are some sort of statutory authority. In reality they are a disgusting cowboy company who use sixth-rate solicitors who can't get any other work so are reduced to doing everything on the cheap with no due diligence for private parking companies. Your letter is meant to totally ignore their procedures and show you've sussed them for who they are.  From their point of view it would be better to drop you like a hot potato and instead concentrate on going after people daft enough to give in. That's why I went on & on about their previous court humiliations, to show them that if they continue with you they'll just end up with another thrashing.
    • Hello and thank you for that It says as follows 1 - Driving without due care and attention - sec 3 Road Traffic Act 1988 2. - Failing to stop at a road traffic accident - sec 170 (4) Road Traffic Act 1988 3.   Failing to report road traffic accident - sec 170 (4) Road Traffic Act 1988 To be honest, none of the above occurred. Yes, they say I have to tell them who the driver was, but as I am the only one using my car it would be me anyway. Due to the location of the alleged offences I am pretty sure it is to do with this lorry driver.  I am happy to say it was me driving, but should I also give a written account of my side of events , as they have kindly provided a blank piece of paper for me. But not sure as these are criminal charges, whether I should put anything in writing at this stage I don't really know what it's about and don't know on what evidence these allegations are based on, given the fact none of the above actually occured.
    • This sounds like someone has alleged that you wee involved in an accident which caused damage or injury to a third party or their property. If the request is issued under Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act (and it should mention that) you are obliged to respond by providing the driver's details. But that is all you are obliged to do at this stage. As far as the failing to stop/report charges are concerned, you could inform the police that you did neither because, as far as you are aware, no accident requiring you to stop occurred.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Got cheque, and have been offered full and final settlement on account(I need help pe


wizardcompuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6325 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a call last night from the bank offering me a full and final settlement fiqure on my account. I told them that I was taking them to court for unfair charges. court Date was set to feb 23rd. They said they would hold the offer but i would have to make a payment over the phone. I told them id think about it. Today i recieved a cheque for the full amount of charges with two letters to send the court to stop all proceedings. Can i pay the full and final amount then go into the bank tomorrow and cash in my cheque is this legal or can they get out of paying me, or is this two completely different issues. Its just that they have put my account number on cheque and i can only pay it into that account. hope ive explained clearly. cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

not entirely clear, have you been paid once and the cheque has the account number of the claim or twice. If it is twice I cannot help(moral high ground, sorry) if once then the cheque can be paid into any account you like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they were refusing to pay me my charges back and it went to the court stage. court date 23rd feb. They phone me every night to ask for repayment of my overdraft. Last nite they offered me a full and final settlement and i was unsure because i didnt want to pay anything because of court. Now today i received a cheque for the amount i was claiming with letters to end the claim. Im just wondering if i can accept their full and final offer on my account and pay it tonight and then tommorrow go and pay the cheque in. I would pay it into my other bank but they have put my account number on cheque

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I am with you but to clarify, the cheque is more than the total of the overdraft so there is more money than you owe? Well you can pay the cheque into either account and when it is cleared that is when you discontinue your case, and I would suggest clear and get rid of the account forever. They cannot pay it into the account because you have sued them

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes about £400 extra. I owe 2800 on account and the cheque is 3150. They said in phone call last night they would accept £1600 in a full and final settlement of the account. I said i was taking them to court to recover my charges. she said this has nothing to do with charges im just after the money you are overdrawn. So i was thinking accept her offer of 1600 and have the account closed. but i have the cheque which states to pay into account so if its closed i cant get the money. i cant understand why they didnt pay money into account and send me remiander of the money. they have offered to close my account for 1600 but what happens when i pay the money for full and final and then try to pay cheque in. surely they cant do anything about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

pay it into your main account now, contact natwest and state that you will pay £1600 to settle the account and want it in writing prior to issuing a payment which you will make when you have received it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry to jump on your thread but i have a friend who is in a similar position.

 

he was taking NatWest to court, already filed and received a date as far as i know.

 

today he received a cheque from them for the full amount (less 2 charges that are now more than 6 years old) and has paid it into his NatWest account (seems he had to because it said payable to acc number on it, which i find odd - but im guessing he has an overdraft that needs clearing)

 

anyway its paid in. should he wait a while before sending the discontinuation of claim forms to the back and courts for the cheque to clear?

 

surelly they wouldnt do anything like cancel the cheque before it clears?

 

if someone could give a quick reply on this as hes phoning at 8 i'd be very gratefull

 

ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they cant cancel the cheque its in a legal letter that they are going to pay. He could do what im thinking of doing. he could offer a full and final settlement offer of say half what hes overdrawn that way he will get more money but im just wondering if there is a legal loophole to stop this. the thing is though that the bank offered me the full and final so surely its their own responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah. of course. never thought to ask what it said in the accompanying letter!!.

 

Shame hes already paid it into his overdrawn NatWest account as ive just read that the cheque could acctually have been paid into any account. Still im sure he will be chuffed anyway.

 

thanks again.

 

now i just with my claim against barclays would result in a cheque out of the blue like this but im not holding my breath :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry been away. i have another bank account with loyds tsb. can i pay the cheque into that account? its just on the cheque it says pay MY NAME into acct: MY NATWEST ACCOUNT NUMBER. would loyds let me put this cheque in my account with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest peed orf

When I received my cheque it had the account number on it, But to me it just looked like a reference [incase of more claims] rather than a demand to put it in that account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...