Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

abbey - i won *** WON ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wrote to them using the lovely letter from Alan, they certainly got back to me within the 40 day deadline, merely to repeat that the documents I want are on Microfiche and do not need to conform to the DPA 40 day ruling. I will get them sometime...........they will keep my file open for 8 weeks and if I do not get back to them in that time they will close it automatically.

 

What do I do now?

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send an edited version of this letter.

 

Dear

Data Protection Act 1998 Disclosure Request

Account Number:

I am in receipt of your letter dated XX/07/06 outlining that you could only provide me with printouts covering recent transactions on my account, because any information prior to May 2004 has been archived onto microfiche. Further I acknowledge receipt of the information you forwarded.

My request was for a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my account since my account was opened, in short a list of charges with dates and amounts. Alternatively a complete set of account statements for that period will be acceptable. This should be retrievable from your accounting systems and easy for you to produce. I will accept a computer print out of these transactions.

I am aware that you have been willing and able to provide other customers with a print-out of transaction information covering this period and am ready to bring this to the attention of the Information Commissioner should it prove necessary. I would also draw your attention to Smith v Lloyds TSB Bank plc (2005) EWHC 246 (Ch).

This letter has been sent by first class recorded delivery and therefore should have reached you by XX/07/06. I have no doubt that you will be aware, as of this date you have just XX days in which to comply with my request. As stated above, a complete set of account statements for the period in question will be acceptable; however, I expect this to be provided within the time period for Data Protection Act compliance.

Should there be any further attempts to delay compliance, I will be left with no alternative but to commence a County Court action under section 7, and section 15(2) of the Data Protection Act 1998, and in due course, escalate this matter into an official complaint to the Information Commissioner and the FSA.

Yours faithfully,

 

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Pinstriping

 

You have to send them the letter before action for non-compliance of your SAR. They have 7 days to reply before you have to take them to court. You can follow the link below to see the template letters for this action. The link is broken down in to 3 scenarios that you have found yourself in, just choose the one that suits your situation, and copy, print and send it off.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

 

Phil

This is only my personal, honest opinion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Hagenuk

 

I thought the 'microfiche argument' letter was sent if you received their reply from Pam Speed about the microfiche within the 40 days of your SAR, just to give the shABBEY a kick up the backside. Once the 40 days has passed, don't you send them the LBA for non-compliance?

 

Could you clear this up for me?

Thanks

Phil

This is only my personal, honest opinion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I'm still in the forty day period and have sent them a letter similar to that above. I then sent them the first LBA letter when I received less that a full year's worth of statements (I requested a list of 6 years worth of charges). My next step will be the seven days non compliance LBA letter when the forty days is over.

[FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=red]22/06/2006 - Data Protection Act Letter to Abbey Sent[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]10/08/2006 - Prelim Letter Sent for Estimated Charges[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]04/09/2006 - DPA Belatedly Fulfilled[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]12/09/2006 - LBA Sent for Refund of £2,942.14 Including Interest[/COLOR][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Hagenuk

 

I thought the 'microfiche argument' letter was sent if you received their reply from Pam Speed about the microfiche within the 40 days of your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), just to give the shABBEY a kick up the backside. Once the 40 days has passed, don't you send them the LBA for non-compliance?

 

Could you clear this up for me?

Thanks

Phil

 

Hello Phil

 

In my opinion sending them the non-compliance letter will not work if they believe that they are not at fault.

 

They are in denial regarding microfiche and the DPA 1998.

 

This letter should also demonstrate to them and to a)You know what you are doing and b) if it ever did get to court, you had done everything in your power to prevent litigation.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm having a similar problem. I sent the DPA request and they sent me the microfiche rejection letter saying it would be sent out as and when basically. I then recieved about a year's worth of statements plus a printed statement covering about 6 weeks of transaction (though this period was covered in the year's worth of statements anyway so I have no idea why they sent this).

 

Anyway I sent the letter above to counter their microfiche argument and today recieved a letter from their Business Manager Pam Speed (who had sent me the initial corrospondence) basically repeating the microfiche argument and saying they don't acknowledge the DPA request.

 

They've said I will get the statements but have given me no time frame and it appears they wil certainly not send them within the 40 days I've allowed.

 

Any suggestions as to what action to take from here? I'm fed up to the back teeth with Abbey and have no doubt they owe me a fair amount of money over the full 6 years (the last year amounted to £888 worth of charges!?!) so I'm fully prepared to report them to ombudsmen.

 

Any help is greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Polly, I've been having a look around and there seems to be a new sticky directly related to this problem of Abbey not acknowledging Data Protection Act requests so I think this is an issue with a quite a few people...

 

I must get my case information in my signature like everyone else here has as well :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I beleive many people have been taking Abbey to court to force compliance, but Abbey apparently supply the information before any court hearing. I am not expecting Abbey to comply with my request either. If this is the case I will take them to court.

[FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=red]22/06/2006 - Data Protection Act Letter to Abbey Sent[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]10/08/2006 - Prelim Letter Sent for Estimated Charges[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]04/09/2006 - DPA Belatedly Fulfilled[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]12/09/2006 - LBA Sent for Refund of £2,942.14 Including Interest[/COLOR][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

WEll I will be darned I was unpacking a box today - moved a year ago and still have some to do - when I found a further two yearrs Bank Statements for shabbey. The fees to be reclaimed are about £2k. Regretably there are no more boxes.

 

Should I issue a claim for the current amount with a proviso to lodge a further claim if and when the Microfische documents arise?

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Righ Prelim letter has been sent including request for unknown estimate. Now then I want to proceed with the DPA Non Compliance form but I got lost at section 6 the request for details - is there a set wording for this section or do I have to outline everything again?

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pinstriping - your 'boxed statements' seems a far more 'relevant filing system' than microfiche! :lol:

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the form on the Information commissioners site it is section 6 that has confused me a deatiled brkdown of the problem.... did you not bother with this step?

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going in - Letter before action sent today

Still no Microfilch !

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

almost £500 returned to my account today no correspondence no explanation !

how do I handle this - will I be deemed to have accepted this and nullified my claim?

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

almost £500 returned to my account today no correspondence no explanation !

how do I handle this - will I be deemed to have accepted this and nullified my claim?

 

Unless you have agreed anything with them, or signed any such agreement that this is full and final settlement then no, this will have no bearing on your claim, save as to reduce it by the amount they have just paid you.

 

Continue with the remainder.

 

You may wish to write to them asking for an explanation and informing them that you will continue with your claim for the balance of the charges owed.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Hagenuk

 

Was a bit worried there for a moment - but a pleasant shock - am still in disbelief about it !

 

I willtake your advice and write to them as you suggest.

 

Many thanks

Lynda

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also just had a load refunded but they still owe me a load according to my estimate as still no microfiche, received letter today stating basically as a goodwill gesture they have refunded ££ and loads of other crap. Going to reply as already sent LBA. Going to thank them but want remainder by 31/8 or proceed with court action

;) [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][U]wayne[/U].[/SIZE][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the sounds of it they are trying to throw you off the scent and hope you will leave them alone! Well done on the money you have got back so far, and just look forward to when you get the remainder!

[FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=red]22/06/2006 - Data Protection Act Letter to Abbey Sent[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]10/08/2006 - Prelim Letter Sent for Estimated Charges[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]04/09/2006 - DPA Belatedly Fulfilled[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=#ff0000]12/09/2006 - LBA Sent for Refund of £2,942.14 Including Interest[/COLOR][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, mega confused. Had the microfiche arguement, replied with the microfiche letter and had the same response as others. (my account was closed in April 2005, so not going to get anything of any use) so will wait for the 40 days to be up before sending an estimated amount to be claimed back. Is that the correct procedure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next question

Their 14 days on the lBA runs out 1st September.

As they have refunded me some money approx £500, I would like to wait until I receive my next statements about the 14th and detail the correct figures to amend my claim based on the exact refund received. Will it matter that I delay by 14-21 days before going to the court action stage. I feel I want to keep the figures exact so that they have no wriggle room if you know what I mean.

The Johnsons -v- Abbey Est Claim £2500

14/06/06 Request for statements over 6 years sent

28/06/06Received 12 months statements with Microfishe excuse

19/07/06 Sent Microfische Letter

24/7/06 Rcvd 2nd Fob off re Microfische from Pam Speed on 40 day limit.

01/08/06 Prelim letter for refund based statements (£1993.00 + interest) and estimated £3000 + interest for missing statements

14/08/06 LBA sent !

17/08/06 £680 refunded to my aco**** with no explanation -

24/08/06 LBA sent re Non Compliance S7 Data Protection Act

1/9/06 Abbey complaints refund letter received and ignored preparing N1

7/9/06 All microfiche copies received. Preparing N1

14/9 revised LBA sent

03/10 Litigation commenced

AQ 17/11 AQ returned

15/01 Statement of Evidence Lodged - Abbey Have until 12th Feb

Court Date Scheduled 21st Feb

Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW

 

I personally wouldnt delay, i would add a closing date to the LBA and continue.

 

When you win you can write to them asking them to reinstate all chrges since that date or else you will take another action out against them.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same boat, 40 days expired, 2 Microfiche letters and some rubbish from the Complaints department, I have sent the Notice of Action letter, 7 days expires today so now I want to take the gits to court.

 

I'm just slightly confused about one thing, as Shabby are in non-compliance of the DPA I have no idea of how much my claim might be, but at a guess I would say 3-4K. What I need to understand is that by filling out the N1 form etc as a means of making Abbey comply with my SAR I am forcing them to provide the amount that I wish to claim for.

 

Is this effectively killing two birds with one stone or will I still have to wait for my past statements which the court will force them to supply and then resubmit a claim with the right financials on it.

 

Any help greatly appreciated.

 

Ella

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...