Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

WhatMoney -v- Lloyds - So **WON** (in court!)


WhatMoney?
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Am I right in thinking that as they've now said they're defending the CI, that they won't be arguing over the main body of the claim in court? i.e: the interest they still owe me?

Not sure I totally understand the question? No, presumably the charges aren't an issue anymore - although that'll depend to a certain extent on the judge. He'll probably get you to iron out a settlement which will likely be charges + 8% + fees. As you've got a genuine reason for going to court anyway then it won't do any harm making a case for CI, but as we've discussed before I personally don't think you've got much, if any, chance of getting it.

 

Yes, you can certainly still make a case for costs - the fact that they've severed your claim at the last minute to pay a section of it after months of posturing only re-inforces your allegations of unreasonable conduct IMO.

 

Good luck - let us know how you get on.:)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's what I meant, thanks.

 

Good to know I can still claim costs!

 

As I said before, I don't expect to be awarded CI, but I think it's worth a try plus, tbh, I'd quite like to see what the judge thinks of my arguments for it.

 

I'll post to tell you all how it went...

Link to post
Share on other sites

My brain feels a bit addled, so I won't go into too much detail just now, but I won!

 

No chance to speak to the barrister beforehand, so into court. Explained that I was claiming back the interest the bank had taken off me as well as the CI. Somehow it took ages to clear up which was which with that.

 

The barrister, poor chap, hadn't been given very much info, and the judge seemed to be a little tired of these cases! I think, though, that the judge was relieved not to be looking at the matters surrounding the charges themselves, but just at my entitlement to interest.

 

The banks' line was that they had chosen to repay my charges as a commercial interest (not admission of any wrongdoing) and were therefore entitled to keep the interest I had paid. The judge was of the opinion that the repayment of charges suggested that the money was taken "erroneously", and that the interest should be repayed.

 

However, he did not feel I should receive 8% interest on that, as that would be interest on interest. Also, had I had that money in a savings a/c, for instance, I would not have been able to receive that rate of interest.

 

Basically, that I should be returned to the position I would have been in had the charges not been taken, but that I should not make any profit.

 

So, I'm slightly down on what I expected (I must admit I didn't expect that much trouble just getting back the interest I'd paid!), but only by about £30. I didn't submit my costs order as I was feeling quite overwhelmed that point, but I intend to do that later this week (I understand I can do that?)

 

But the point, which occurred to me when I was nearly home, is that I won!! The judge found in my favour that Lloyds should repay the interest, when they actually sent someone to court to defend it. So I'm happy.

 

I now have spending money for my holiday (first holiday since 1996!) :razz:

 

xxx

 

(will make a donation when I receive the rest of my money)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Done....congratulations.

 

:D :d :D :d

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great!! Well done WM, congratulations!!!!:D

 

Shame you did'nt get any interest, but this highlights the fact that even the 8% SI is not an entitlement (let alone CI) - as you found out today interest is solely at the discretion of the court. A lot of people don't realise that.

 

Very well done, enjoy the money. I'll change your title for you.;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all!!

 

I'll post again tomorrow with some more info, but I really appreciate your support. Gary; thanks very much for your advice and reassurance when I started to stress, it was much needed and appreciated.

 

TTFN,

WM xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Whatmoney!!

 

I am sorry that you did not receive any interest though...but congrats!

 

I have possibly shot myself in the foot I feel....I am claiming contractual 18.9% but in the alternative - at the courts discretion (because they took my money unlawfully) unauthorised, I did not mention 8% at all....and they are defending the whole amount....maybe I will end up with no interest whatsoever as well.

 

At least all the stress is over for you....I hope that you can treat yourself with the settlement.

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...